New cameras or stick with PDX10? - Page 2 at

Go Back   DV Info Net > Sony XAVC / XDCAM / NXCAM / AVCHD / HDV / DV Camera Systems > Sony HDV and DV Camera Systems > Sony TRV950 / PDX10 Companion

Sony TRV950 / PDX10 Companion TRV900, PD100A and other Sony DV camcorders.

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old February 14th, 2004, 08:38 AM   #16
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 11,462
All DV cameras use an image size of 720 x 480, but that has no relation to an individual camera's resolution, which has more to do with the optics and electronics. Actually the DV codec itself is limited to around 530 horizontal lines, so no camera is going to get much better than this (but I suspect that many are comparable). Take a look at some PDX-10 still photos from the megapixel chips and compare to still DV frames. Right away you'll see the trade-offs made when compressing 30 pictures per second on the fly with DV.

A search should give you more background on DV and resolution; here's one thread with a lot of information.
Boyd Ostroff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 14th, 2004, 09:39 AM   #17
New Boot
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Findlay, Ohio
Posts: 21
Hare are a few more resources that describe line of horz. resolution and how the different video formats compare.

"A standard way of specifying the clarity of a video image is by its lines of horizontal resolution. By this standard, the DV format really stands out. It has 500 lines, about twice the resolution of VHS and 8mm video and 25% better than S-VHS or Hi-8."

"Standard NTSC live broadcast TV has a horizontal resolution of 330 lines, broadcasts from video tape have about 300, and laserdisc has 420. Super-VHS and Hi-8 also have 420 lines of resolution, although the picture is not quite as good as laserdisc, illustrating that there are more factors than just resolution that go into making a video image."
Jim J. Donaldson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 14th, 2004, 02:59 PM   #18
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Albany, NY 12210
Posts: 2,610
Man that really blows! I know resolution isn't everything, but it's a lot.
Marco Leavitt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 9th, 2004, 03:20 PM   #19
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Upper Pittsgrove, NJ
Posts: 95
A little resolution history

The whole "lines of resolution" comes from optics, ages ago. Back then, and still in still photography, they speak of line-pair, not lines: obviously, for every back line, there's a corresponding white one, or you wouldn't see lines at all.

Anyway, the area of measure is traditionally a real circle inscribed over your focal plane. Before there was any distinction in the means of recording horizontal or vertical imagery, this wasn't necessarily recorded as lines of horizontal or vertical resolution, just lines of resolution.

When video came along, the horizontal dimension was the interesting one. You pretty much could guarantee a lens that wasn't at issue, and in the vertical, the resolution was basically digital (eg, your 484 or 576 or whatever potentially visible scan lines). But in the horizontal, you're analog.

So basically, now converting that to digital, you have a circle still based on your vertical resolution: 480 pixels in DV/NTSC. And from that, you have a horizontal circle extent based on your horizontal resolution and aspect ration. So measured at 4:3 and 720 pixels, the limit is something just below 540 lines. In 16:9, with precisely the same optical characteristics and resolution, your limit is something just below 405 lines.

In other words, if your camcorder does 530 lines, in practical terms, that's as good as it gets (you'll have to judge, at the edges of that circle, where a line really begins, to decide if you believe this is slightly off the theoretical max, or in fact nailing the theoretical max).
Dave Haynie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 9th, 2004, 05:29 PM   #20
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 11,462
Some great info Dave, thanks! If you're really interested in seeing all this with your own eyes, there's a pretty simple test. Download the EIA-1956 test pattern from John Beale's website, resize in Photoshop to 720x480 and drop it into your NLE as a still image. Now on your NTSC monitor you should be seeing the actual max resolution that DV can give you since no optics or CCD's are involved. If you look at the numbers next to the converging horizontal and vertical lines you can graphically see the resolution. It's interesting to compare the image on your NTSC monitor to the 720x480 photoshop image displayed on your computer monitor. You willl see all the telltale DV artifacts that aren't present in the JPEG.

Then if you want to see what your camera is capable of, print up one of the higher res versions of the chart, shoot it, capture it, and compare...
Boyd Ostroff is offline   Reply

DV Info Net refers all where-to-buy and where-to-rent questions exclusively to these trusted full line dealers and rental houses...

Professional Video
(800) 833-4801
Portland, OR

Omega Broadcast
(512) 251-7778
Austin, TX

(973) 335-4460
Mountain Lakes, NJ

Abel Cine Tech
(888) 700-4416
N.Y. NY & L.A. CA

(800) 238-8480
Glendale, CA

Precision Camera
(800) 677-1023
Austin, TX

DV Info Net also encourages you to support local businesses and buy from an authorized dealer in your neighborhood.
  You are here: DV Info Net > Sony XAVC / XDCAM / NXCAM / AVCHD / HDV / DV Camera Systems > Sony HDV and DV Camera Systems > Sony TRV950 / PDX10 Companion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:38 AM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2015 The Digital Video Information Network