PDX-10 vs PD 150 at DVinfo.net

Go Back   DV Info Net > Sony XAVC / XDCAM / NXCAM / AVCHD / HDV / DV Camera Systems > Sony HDV and DV Camera Systems > Sony VX2100 / PD170 / PDX10 Companion

Sony VX2100 / PD170 / PDX10 Companion
Topics also include Sony's TRV950, VX2000, PD150 & DSR250 family.

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old May 20th, 2003, 07:24 AM   #1
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Key West
Posts: 247
PDX-10 vs PD 150

Wish to purchase a new camera...most work is for event coverage...half low light work...half out of doors...also up close interviews etc. Own a DV 500 ,a 5 year old XL-1 and a beta cam. Editing with FCP and DSR 40 deck. Not as concerned about cost but am concerened about overall performance, size/ weight and reliability. Would greatly appreciate preferences about these 2 cameras. Thanks Craig...abracadabraTV@aol.com
Craig Hollenback is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 20th, 2003, 07:40 AM   #2
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 11,624
I did some image comparisons between the vx-2000 and pdx-10 at http://www.greenmist.com/pdx10. The PDX-10 is not as good as the PD-150 in low light, maybe 1 f-stop different. You don't mention 16:9... I think that's the most compelling reason to get the PDX-10, although you mention size and weight. The 10 is significantly smaller and lighter than the 150. If you don't need native 16:9 you will probably be happier with the PD-150.

Browse through the PDX-10 and PD-150 forums here, this topic has been covered in great detail during the past couple months.
Boyd Ostroff is online now   Reply With Quote
Old May 20th, 2003, 02:44 PM   #3
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Vallejo, California
Posts: 4,049
For a lot of my work, the PD150 is great. Low light level capability make it great.

The only problem I have with it is it just does not handle fast enough in manual mode. That's not a condemnation, just the facts.

Where things change rapidly and I need manual mode operation, my DSR-300 works much faster than the 150. Has a slightly better picture but not really noticable. and a slightly inferior low-light capabilites but it compensates quite a bit by having a superior DSP so contrasty conditions are handled a bit better.

If I need good pictures and easy handling, I use the PD150. If I need the best picture and fast handling, I use the DSR-300.

All of my DSR-300 preference goes out the window, BTW, if I have to carry it very far or very fast.
Mike Rehmus
Hey, I can see the carrot at the end of the tunnel!
Mike Rehmus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 21st, 2003, 10:42 PM   #4
Permanently Banned
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 265
PD150 is very reliable. It is rated 2 lux, which is about 2 F-stops better than PDX10.
Joseph George is offline   Reply

DV Info Net refers all where-to-buy and where-to-rent questions exclusively to these trusted full line dealers and rental houses...

(800) 223-2500
New York, NY

B&H Photo Video
(866) 521-7381
New York, NY

Texas Media Systems
(512) 440-1400
Austin, TX

Precision Camera
(800) 677-1023
Austin, TX

(800) 323-2325
Mineola, NY

DV Info Net also encourages you to support local businesses and buy from an authorized dealer in your neighborhood.
  You are here: DV Info Net > Sony XAVC / XDCAM / NXCAM / AVCHD / HDV / DV Camera Systems > Sony HDV and DV Camera Systems > Sony VX2100 / PD170 / PDX10 Companion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:40 AM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2018 The Digital Video Information Network