|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 13th, 2010, 08:10 AM
|
#1 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 753
|
EX3's on the side lines at Texans vs Colts
I attended the Texans football game on sunday saw a couple of EX3's on the side lines.
|
|
|
|
September 13th, 2010, 09:01 AM
|
#2 |
|
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 2,231
|
Thanks for posting
|
|
|
|
|
September 13th, 2010, 11:11 AM
|
#3 |
|
Sponsor: TapeWorks Texas
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 357
|
Wish I could've been there! How about them Texans whoopin' up on Manning and Team!
|
|
|
|
|
September 13th, 2010, 11:46 AM
|
#4 |
|
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Posts: 3,014
|
Gee, I guess they aren't worried about shooting footage for the BBC huh? ;-)
|
|
|
|
|
September 15th, 2010, 06:05 AM
|
#5 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: All over, USA
Posts: 512
|
"Gee, I guess they aren't worried about shooting footage for the BBC huh? ;-) "
Les, please explain that |
|
|
|
|
September 15th, 2010, 06:34 AM
|
#6 |
|
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Posts: 3,014
|
It was a sarcastic comment what with all the obsession, hype and chest beating around shooting 4:2:2 50MB because that's the "BBC Standard" and (unspoken) what the recent Canon entrance into solid state cameras shoot ... albeit on a 1/3" chip.
Last edited by Les Wilson; September 15th, 2010 at 07:48 AM. |
|
|
|
|
September 15th, 2010, 10:25 AM
|
#7 | |
|
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chislehurst, London
Posts: 1,724
|
Quote:
Regarding the BBC and other stations that turn their nose up at 35mbs, I doubt if anyone could see the difference between 35 and 50mbs. I saw some news reel footage of the airline crash landing on the bay in New York, I doubt if any broadcast company would turn this down because it was shot at 50mbs. The point I make is, if your footage is good then it will get used.
__________________
Eyes are a deaf man’s ears. Ears are a blind man’s eyes |
|
|
|
|
|
September 15th, 2010, 11:15 AM
|
#8 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: All over, USA
Posts: 512
|
Vincent
That works for newsworthy footage. But news is a small part of the production world. Clients very often dictate what camera/format they will accept. Discovery HD considers the EX cameras fully acceptable, that is a very good standard. |
|
|
|
|
September 15th, 2010, 08:06 PM
|
#9 | |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 753
|
Quote:
There was an EX3 one on each side of the field sorry I did not get more photos to busy shooting the cheerleaders and the Game. I will try to talk to one of the video guys at the Dallas game on the 26th. |
|
|
|
|
|
September 17th, 2010, 03:00 AM
|
#10 |
|
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chislehurst, London
Posts: 1,724
|
Thanks, the cheer leaders look far more interesting than the guys with their EX3 cameras
__________________
Eyes are a deaf man’s ears. Ears are a blind man’s eyes |
|
|
|
|
September 17th, 2010, 03:13 AM
|
#11 | |
|
Inner Circle
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Wales
Posts: 2,130
|
Quote:
It's always been like this, even with SD there were programmes that would accept DVCam and others that insisted on Digibeta, due to the compression casuing issues on broadcast. And this was why Digibetas cost more than 5x as much as DSR500s, just as it's why a PDW500 will cost more than 5x as much as an EX3. Steve |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
