A homebuilt arm to be proud of at DVinfo.net
DV Info Net

Go Back   DV Info Net > The Tools of DV and HD Production > Support Your Local Camera > Stabilizers (Steadicam etc.)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old October 28th, 2004, 06:29 AM   #1
Major Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: sweden
Posts: 795
A homebuilt arm to be proud of

Here is something to water your mouth. You guys want to see a homebuilt professional arm? Check this out: Thanks to Andreas for the pic. This is the same guy who flew a 16mm on his older arm I posted along time ago who is a member on HBS website.

http://www.andreaskielb.de/new_arm.jpg

If you want more info on the arm just go to HBS forum.
__________________
Charles
'What we perceive to be may not be what we believe to be.'
Charles King is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 28th, 2004, 08:50 AM   #2
Wrangler
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 6,810
Damn, that guy is good! It looks like a cross between a PRO and a Glidecam Gold arm. Impressive.
__________________
Charles Papert
www.charlespapert.com
Charles Papert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 28th, 2004, 09:02 AM   #3
Major Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Romania, Timisoara
Posts: 453
Hehe! I was just about to post this, Charles K. :)

Anyway, I'd say is more like www.baer-bel.de
We actualy talked about it on the forum, while Andreas made his design.
He calls himself the "beta tester" for the ideas that went back and forth on HBS forum! He did a wonderful job!

Damn, it looks good!
__________________
Cosmin Rotaru
Cosmin Rotaru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 28th, 2004, 06:31 PM   #4
Major Player
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 280
Impressive is right. Nice work!
__________________
Casey Visco
Glidecam Industries, Inc.

Casey Visco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 29th, 2004, 09:10 AM   #5
Major Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 220
Good Lord! That's not just an arm, it's a work of art. Beee-u-ti-ful job!

Dan
www.DVcameraRigs.com
Dan Selakovich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 29th, 2004, 01:10 PM   #6
Trustee
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: NZ
Posts: 1,276
May I ask how do you guys consider a good arm for steadicam? What crerteria? Light? Good looking?

TIA

Regards
Leigh
Leigh Wanstead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 30th, 2004, 03:06 AM   #7
Major Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: sweden
Posts: 795
Here is my criteria:

1. Build (materials involved. Again, a budget thing)

2. Durability

3. Function

4. Stability

5. Capacity (depends on what capacity it was built for; for example, DV or Film. In other words, light weight or Heavy weight)

6. Weight. (The lighter the better but all depends on the budget involved)

Please note that my criteria extend to both commercial and Custombuilt/homebuilt arms.
__________________
Charles
'What we perceive to be may not be what we believe to be.'
Charles King is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 30th, 2004, 10:52 AM   #8
Wrangler
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 6,810
That's a good list, Charles.

I would add my own thoughts that once you are actually flying the rig, the most important of those is #3--Function (I would probably bundle #4-- Stability, in with this). The smoother and more linear the arm, the better your results will be. What ultimately counts is what ends up on screen. But of course, if the arm isn't strong enough to properly counter the weight (#5), or it is excessively heavy (#6), then it will fatigue the operator more quickly which will ultimately affect the quality of the shot; and if it falls apart on you just before a take (#1 and #2), then you won't have a shot at all!

Had an exciting event a few days ago on "ER"--we were hardmounting the Steadicam on the dolly in low mode for a ground-level up to eye-level shot, and while balancing I heard an ominous announcement from down below. The part between the socket block and the first section of the arm had cracked deeply in two places, and would surely have broken in two given a substantial amount of additional torque.

Fortunately, we were only about 10 miles from the PRO shop, so I handed it off to transpo and it was back in my hands about an hour later, all fixed up with a new part! Too late for that particular shot, which we did on the dolly with a massive dance floor.
__________________
Charles Papert
www.charlespapert.com
Charles Papert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 30th, 2004, 11:11 AM   #9
Major Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: sweden
Posts: 795
<<<-- Fortunately, we were only about 10 miles from the PRO shop, so I handed it off to transpo and it was back in my hands about an hour later, all fixed up with a new part! Too late for that particular shot, which we did on the dolly with a massive dance floor. -->>>

Not that was a big coincident. Just shows even the big rigs are capable of unfortunate accidents. Nice going Charles P.
__________________
Charles
'What we perceive to be may not be what we believe to be.'
Charles King is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 30th, 2004, 11:14 AM   #10
Capt. Quirk
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Middle of the woods in Georgia
Posts: 3,596
This may sound naive, but please bear with me... The arm itself looks really good, there is no doubt. However, what good is just the arm without a vest? Does Andreas have any plans to make a harness?
__________________
www.SmokeWagonLeather.us
K. Forman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 30th, 2004, 12:50 PM   #11
Old Boot
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 3,633
Now THIS is what I've been talking about for a long time, about camera stuff. Form over Function if and when it works - WILL look fabulous . .remember the Spitfire? remember The Mallard steam engine? Now getting behind this concept and reversing the idea of this philosophy, think of a beautiful design and the function will be better . . by miles!

This piece of design should really get an award . . . .

Best regards,

Graham Bernard
Graham Bernard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 30th, 2004, 01:22 PM   #12
Major Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: sweden
Posts: 795
<<<-- Originally posted by Keith Forman : This may sound naive, but please bear with me... The arm itself looks really good, there is no doubt. However, what good is just the arm without a vest? Does Andreas have any plans to make a harness? -->>>

Keith, of course he has the sled and vest. Like you said what's the point of the arm if he doesn't have the rest of the gear, com'on now.
No, he doesn't have any plans, as far as I know. If you want questions ask him on the HBS forum. He'll be glad to answer any questions.

His sled has cponents from an old EFP Sled (includes the gimbal as well).
He has a back-mounted vest but I think he is re-doing the vest. Again, you can ask him on the HBS forum if you want more info.

Graham, so far it works but he's doing more testing. He's machining more plugs to accomodate heavier springs to do more testing. Again, keep checking the forum, where he resides ;)
__________________
Charles
'What we perceive to be may not be what we believe to be.'
Charles King is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 30th, 2004, 01:44 PM   #13
Old Boot
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 3,633
Oh yes, of course. But the fundamental wish to actually "make" a beautiful thing that then WORKS is - for my thinking - the way to go. I'm sorry, but there are some truly ugly and hideous stabilzers out there that shouldn't work, just on the basis that they are ugly IMHO!

Graham
Graham Bernard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 30th, 2004, 02:08 PM   #14
Capt. Quirk
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Middle of the woods in Georgia
Posts: 3,596
Charles- I understand now... I think. What he is doing, is taking the componants of an existing system, and redesigning a new arm to fit it. So, what is the sled? And, can you get just the harness without the rest of the gear? Is there any real advantage?

Please understand, I'm not overly familiar with stabalisers, as are some of these illustrious members. I am curious, and hope to be able to move up to better gear... some day.
__________________
www.SmokeWagonLeather.us
K. Forman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 30th, 2004, 03:25 PM   #15
Major Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: sweden
Posts: 795
<<<-- Originally posted by Keith Forman : Charles- I understand now... I think. What he is doing, is taking the componants of an existing system, and redesigning a new arm to fit it. So, what is the sled? And, can you get just the harness without the rest of the gear? Is there any real advantage?

Please understand, I'm not overly familiar with stabalisers, as are some of these illustrious members. I am curious, and hope to be able to move up to better gear... some day. -->>>

Keith, you are misunderstanding me. The arm is completely built from scratch. Everything is machined from the ground up.

The sled is the only thing that uses parts from the Steadicam EFP and the SK2. Parts of the sled is from the SK2 and the gimbal comes from the EFP. The rest is homebuilt.

Can you please clarify your question on getting just the harness without the rest of the gear? If I understand you right. There is no point in just having the arm if you don't have the sled; and at the same token there is no point in getting the vest if you don't have the sled and the arm.

<<<--I'm sorry, but there are some truly ugly and hideous stabilzers out there that shouldn't work, just on the basis that they are ugly IMHO!-->>>

Graham, Have you heard the story of the ugly duckling? ;)
__________________
Charles
'What we perceive to be may not be what we believe to be.'
Charles King is offline   Reply
Reply

DV Info Net refers all where-to-buy and where-to-rent questions exclusively to these trusted full line dealers and rental houses...

B&H Photo Video
(866) 521-7381
New York, NY USA

Scan Computers Int. Ltd.
+44 0871-472-4747
Bolton, Lancashire UK


DV Info Net also encourages you to support local businesses and buy from an authorized dealer in your neighborhood.
  You are here: DV Info Net > The Tools of DV and HD Production > Support Your Local Camera > Stabilizers (Steadicam etc.)

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

 



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:23 AM.


DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network