|
|
|
|
|
May 27th, 2008, 06:00 AM
|
#31 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Northampton, UK
Posts: 915
|
I looked at the flycam and went for the glidecam in the end and glad I did. Ive learnt if you buy cheap you buy twice. Youll get it, it may do the job but youll want more :) So you end up buying the glidecam/steadicam anyway after you spent £300 on the flycam.
Then again, totally depends on your budget, its still going to be better than handheld which for a pro really is inexcusable. |
|
|
|
May 27th, 2008, 02:16 PM
|
#32 | |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: sweden
Posts: 795
|
Quote:
Now this statement makes me laugh. Simply because, you mentioned cheap does not always mean bad... ;) I am wondering if you are only referring to Steadicam products or Stabilizers in general? If you mean in general then, I won't repeat that quote on the steadicam forum...Ha Ha!! They'll probably say anything Steadicam and cheap is good...anything not steadicam but cheap is bad.... Ha Ha
__________________
Charles 'What we perceive to be may not be what we believe to be.' |
|
|
|
|
 |
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
