|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
June 10th, 2006, 06:37 PM
|
#1 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Houston TX and New Orleans LA
Posts: 300
|
Taking pictures/video of people in public (IMPORTANT LINK)
__________________
I produce High Quality content with My Certain Style... I cover South Padre, TX to Tampa Bay, FL FYI: That includes... Corpus Christi, Galveston, Houston, Beaumont/ Lake Charles, Lafayette, Baton Rouge, New Orleans, Biloxi, Mobile, Penscola, Ft. Walton, Panama City... Any every little city and town in between. If you need anything, Let's talk... |
|
|
|
June 17th, 2006, 07:15 AM
|
#2 |
|
Wrangler
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles (recently from San Francisco)
Posts: 954
|
It's a good article and mostly right. However, there are a number of concerns that are not addressed, including commercial appropriation of likeness and right-of-publicity (which varies from state-to-state), false light defamation, and a couple of other privacy torts. Anyone considering using a person's image without a release in a commercial context should consult an attorney first. Also, the article was simply wrong when it implied that artists wouldn't sue for including their work in a photograph or film -- it happens all the time.
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
