Go Back   The Digital Video Information Network > The Tools of DV and HD Production > Tapeless Video Recording Solutions


Tapeless Video Recording Solutions
DTE (Direct To Edit) systems which bypass the video capture process.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old June 28th, 2007, 03:10 AM   #91
New Boot
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: New Berlin, WI
Posts: 21
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron Arrivillaga View Post
I did use a pretty beefy cpu for this test (Core2 Duo, 2GB RAM), but CPU usage hovered around only 10% and memory usage never exceeded 256MB.
...
If anyone is interested in this "investigation", I'll post my progress in this thread (or perhaps start another?).
Ron,

I would definately be interested in your findings and anything you may develop along the way. When you did the dual capture, were you previewing either of the streams? If not then I can understand the low CPU usage -- a simple transfer of data from one interface to another shouldn't be too tough on it. I would be curious what the usage would be if there was a scaled-down (25% maybe?) preview of both streams displayed on the screen.

-Sean
Sean Schult is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 28th, 2007, 09:10 AM   #92
New Boot
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Blacksburg, VA
Posts: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sean Schult View Post
Ron,

I would definately be interested in your findings and anything you may develop along the way. When you did the dual capture, were you previewing either of the streams? If not then I can understand the low CPU usage -- a simple transfer of data from one interface to another shouldn't be too tough on it. I would be curious what the usage would be if there was a scaled-down (25% maybe?) preview of both streams displayed on the screen.

-Sean
I agree - for simple capture the limitation shouldn't be the CPU. Bus speed and hard drive speed maybe. Which is why I was thinking it should be possible to capture using a handheld WindowsCE device (no preview of course). I think drivers may be an issue on WinCE though, so I'm going to work the WinXP dual capture angle first. I'll see what I can do about adding preview for both streams.
Ron Arrivillaga is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 3rd, 2007, 06:48 AM   #93
Major Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 594
Ron,

That's very interesting information - good work. After playing around with a stylistic 3500 (which was quite impressive for older hardware), I decided to back off - I'd still like a smaller capture device than that. So, instead, I've decided to sell mine on eBay.

I'll keep checking up on the great work you guys are doing over here, it sure sounds cool.

Thanks,
Ted OMalley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 26th, 2007, 09:09 AM   #94
Major Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 210
Portable 4:2:2 MJPEG recorder

I am trying to do something similar but to make a portable 4:2:2 colorspce and 3:1 compression MJPEG recorder. DV gives us 4:1:1 with 5:1 compression so 4:2:2 would be a step up.
There is a Linux MJPEG page
mjpeg.sourceforge.net

Initially I am planning to get Y/C S-video input and then later use SDI/HDMI for a HD recorder.
Any ideas for the initial SD version ??
Anmol Mishra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 18th, 2007, 02:37 PM   #95
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Wytheville, VA USA
Posts: 64
Here's an update for anyone thinking about building your own portable capture rig running Linux....

dvgrab has been updated to version 3.0

The new version allows capture of HDV video and also allows DV capture via USB.

Since I don't have an HDV camera, I can't attest to how well the new features work. But for standard def I just keep plugging away with mine without any problems. Since August I've captured over 700GB of video directly to my tablet. The only dropped frames happened one night when I used a retractable firewire cable (no shielding) too close to some two-way radios.

David
David Suthers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 7th, 2008, 10:12 AM   #96
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Wytheville, VA USA
Posts: 64
Still going strong...

FYI to anybody who visits this thread...

While I don't visit the boards very often, I still use my Fujitsu tablet for capturing video. I used it filming 88 sporting events during the 2007-2008 school year and have already filmed over 30 events this year. All without lost frames or other issues. That's over 1.7 TERABYTES of video files in the past 15 months.

The proof is obviously in the results and I have been nothing but pleased with how the system works. If I had it to do over, would I? Absolutely!

- David
David Suthers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 14th, 2009, 04:25 PM   #97
Major Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Lexington, Ky - USA
Posts: 449
David- thank you for posting this. It was quite a long read and I am happy to have learned so much. I actually was looking for Direct to DVD articles (and I may seek your advice when I find the right thread) when i came across this jem of an article. Thanks for sharing!
__________________
www.TheVideoProfessional.com - PD170/ 2x-HD1000u - Ikan 8000HD- custom editing PC - Vegas Pro 8 & 9 - Premiere Pro CS4 - and a whole mess of other equipment...
Bryan Daugherty is offline   Reply
Reply

DV Info Net refers all where-to-buy and where-to-rent questions exclusively to these trusted full line dealers and rental houses...
DV Info Net also encourages you to support local businesses and buy from an authorized dealer in your neighborhood.
  You are here: The Digital Video Information Network > The Tools of DV and HD Production > Tapeless Video Recording Solutions

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

 


 

Google
 

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:12 PM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2009 The Digital Video Information Network