Among Film's Ghosts, Its Future at DVinfo.net

Go Back   DV Info Net > And Now, For Something Completely Different... > The TOTEM Poll: Totally Off Topic, Everything Media

The TOTEM Poll: Totally Off Topic, Everything Media
Let's talk about anything media related.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old June 19th, 2003, 07:41 AM   #1
Major Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Jersey City, NJ
Posts: 366
Among Film's Ghosts, Its Future

From this morning's NY Times:

"Behind cast-iron gates lies the Hollywood Pacific Theater, an Italianate palace originally built (but finished too late) for the 1927 premiere of "The Jazz Singer," the first sound film with some spoken dialogue. It has been closed for years, but recently reopened as a test bed for the motion picture industry's next great technical revolution: digital projection.

Where thousands once congregated in ornate halls, today a handful of film executives and technicians use cellphones to communicate across the dark, ghostly space, awaiting the next screening of test images in the otherwise empty theater. On any given day, Shrek and his friends might be gamboling across the screen or Obi-Wan Kenobi might be dueling with his light saber as experts work to devise standards for the movie theater of the future.

The tests are being conducted by the Digital Cinema Laboratory, an organization set up by the University of Southern California's Entertainment Technology Center. A consortium of seven Hollywood studios have contracted with the laboratory to choose the specifications for the equipment and software with which the industry will one day distribute and project feature films without any film at all."

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/06/19/te...ts/19cine.html
Rick Spilman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 19th, 2003, 07:57 AM   #2
RED Code Chef
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Holland
Posts: 12,514
You need to register to follow that link. Does the article have
photo's of the place? Otherwise I'm not bothering.

Sounds like a very nice place to be and would probably be a very
cool set to use on a movie.....
__________________

Rob Lohman, visuar@iname.com
DV Info Wrangler & RED Code Chef

Join the DV Challenge | Lady X

Search DVinfo.net for quick answers | Buy from the best: DVinfo.net sponsors
Rob Lohman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 19th, 2003, 08:11 AM   #3
Major Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Jersey City, NJ
Posts: 366
Registration is free and it is one of the better newspapers in the world. (Did I mention it was free?) And the article does have a lot of interesting info. But if you'ld rather not bother, it is up to you.

A couple of interesting, at least to me, tidbits from the article: Film has around 5,000 lines of resolution when new but after multiple showing is closer to 800. The goal of the folks working on digital projection is to develop a system that delivers a noticeably better image than 35mm. Current digital projectors handle around 1,300 lines. Screenings of DP images at 2,000 lines have been well recieved but the concensus is that they lacked the "wow" factor. They were about as good as 35mm but needed to be significantly better.

This may or may not be good news for indies with DV25 cameras. On the other hand it will take years for digital projection to be developed and rolled out so we will all be shooting some variety of HD by then anyway.
Rick Spilman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 19th, 2003, 09:50 AM   #4
RED Code Chef
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Holland
Posts: 12,514
But does the article have any pictures?
__________________

Rob Lohman, visuar@iname.com
DV Info Wrangler & RED Code Chef

Join the DV Challenge | Lady X

Search DVinfo.net for quick answers | Buy from the best: DVinfo.net sponsors
Rob Lohman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 19th, 2003, 10:10 AM   #5
Retired DV Info Net Almunus
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 6,943
Yes, the article has a few photos (but nothing of a technical nature). The article presents a good, non-nerd summary of the issues surrounding digital projection.

I also strongly agree with Rick that the NYT is not only a worthwhile registration but a bargain at free.
__________________
Lady X Films: A lady with a boring wardrobe...and a global mission.

Hey, you don't have enough stuff!
Buy with confidence from our sponsors. Hand-picked as the best in the business...Really!

See some of my work one frame at a time: www.KenTanaka.com
Ken Tanaka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 19th, 2003, 12:16 PM   #6
Major Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 301
I've been a member for years and really love the movie/entertainment email-news that comes several times a month.
__________________
Mark Moore
Sugar Free Productions
Mark Moore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 19th, 2003, 08:28 PM   #7
Major Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 581
I hadn't thought about the fact that the projection systems must be "better" than 35mm. The reason is the cost of the equipment to the theatre owners. You can't charge the same price for an inferior product.

That line about film dropping to 800 pixels resolution was weird to me and I find it hard to believe.

One thing no one mentions though is that if digital does get to the quality of 35mm film, then production companies could go to 70mm! That would bump up resolution 4x and, essentially, use much cheaper equipment for the theatres.

Now, yes, I know shooting in 70mm is more expensive but compared to the overall multi-million budget, it's not. What if Kodak knocked the price of raw materials for 70mm down to the price of 35mm. Would that impede the introduction of digital productions?

Just some thoughts.
Rob Belics is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 21st, 2003, 07:01 AM   #8
Wrangler
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Makati, Metro Manila
Posts: 2,706
Images: 32
Digital technology advances so quickly, I'd bet that digital becomes much more appealing before 70mm can make serious in-roads - mainly based on how far digital has come in the past 5 years.

<<<-- Originally posted by Rob Belics : What if Kodak knocked the price of raw materials for 70mm down to the price of 35mm. Would that impede the introduction of digital productions?
-->>>

__________________
"Ultimately, the most extraordinary thing, in a frame, is a human being." - Martin Scorsese
Michael Wisniewski is offline   Reply
Reply

DV Info Net refers all where-to-buy and where-to-rent questions exclusively to these trusted full line dealers and rental houses...

Professional Video
(800) 833-4801
Portland, OR

B&H Photo Video
(866) 521-7381
New York, NY

Z.G.C.
(973) 335-4460
Mountain Lakes, NJ

Abel Cine Tech
(888) 700-4416
N.Y. NY & L.A. CA

Precision Camera
(800) 677-1023
Austin, TX

DV Info Net also encourages you to support local businesses and buy from an authorized dealer in your neighborhood.
  You are here: DV Info Net > And Now, For Something Completely Different... > The TOTEM Poll: Totally Off Topic, Everything Media

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

 



Google
 

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:51 PM.


DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2017 The Digital Video Information Network