"Sessions 9"... What was it shot with ? at DVinfo.net

Go Back   DV Info Net > And Now, For Something Completely Different... > The TOTEM Poll: Totally Off Topic, Everything Media

The TOTEM Poll: Totally Off Topic, Everything Media
Let's talk about anything media related.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old August 19th, 2005, 12:12 PM   #1
Tourist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 3
"Sessions 9"... What was it shot with ?

Hey guys a new face here. And this is my first post. My question if anyone knows, what type of camera was used on the movie "Sessions 9" ? I looked at the IMDB and it just says it was shot with Sony's new 24p. I bought this move the day it came out. Being a bit of a gadget and tech freak, I had read it was one of the first movies to be shot digitally. So I wanted to see what Dv footage would look like. And since I am starting to delve into the digital filmwork as a hobby. I was amazed (again) by how beatiful the movie looks. There are some scenes that look less like film and more like Dv footage.

I plan on getting a DVX100a in the future. And I was wondering if the footage would look similar. I know you might be able to use Magic Bullet to achieve the same effect.

Thanks.
Daniel Reynoso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 19th, 2005, 12:51 PM   #2
Wrangler
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia
Posts: 8,308
Hey Daniel, it was shot on a CineAlta.
Check this thread:
http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthrea...hlight=session
__________________
Need to rent camera gear in Vancouver BC?
Check me out at camerarentalsvancouver.com
Dylan Couper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 19th, 2005, 07:39 PM   #3
Wrangler
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 6,781
As always, we like to say that having access to the right equipment is the first step but getting one's footage to look just like a given film is, from that point on, purely a matter of the user's skill, resources and choices.

The DVX100a is a great camera. However the primary thing it has in common with the Cinealta used on "Session 9" is the 24p mode, which was brand new when "Session 9" was shot. Otherwise, two different mediums (HD vs DV), different chipsets and processing.
__________________
Charles Papert
www.charlespapert.com
Charles Papert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 19th, 2005, 10:42 PM   #4
MPS Digital Studios
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Palm Beach County, Florida
Posts: 8,531
It was one of the first films shot with the CineAlta (Star Wars Ep. 2 camera).

heath
__________________
My Final Cut Pro X blog
Heath McKnight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 20th, 2005, 01:37 AM   #5
Wrangler
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia
Posts: 8,308
The Steadicam work in it was OK. While some of it was iffy, the operator showed potential, and may get more work in the future.







(can't keep from laughing while I type that)
__________________
Need to rent camera gear in Vancouver BC?
Check me out at camerarentalsvancouver.com
Dylan Couper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 20th, 2005, 11:16 PM   #6
MPS Digital Studios
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Palm Beach County, Florida
Posts: 8,531
Only one shot, near the beginning from a car looking out, had a look of "video," but otherwise, it looked like film. I think the DVD was made from the original Hd source, not film. If you watch Blair Witch on DVD, it's totally video and didn't sit well with me--I wish they would've transferred from the film print vs. video...

heath
__________________
My Final Cut Pro X blog
Heath McKnight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 21st, 2005, 12:03 AM   #7
Wrangler
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 6,781
Cute, Dylan. Re-a-a-al cute.
__________________
Charles Papert
www.charlespapert.com
Charles Papert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 21st, 2005, 01:43 AM   #8
Wrangler
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia
Posts: 8,308
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charles Papert
Cute, Dylan. Re-a-a-al cute.
Sorry man, you know I'm just jealous cause you got to work on Buffy. :)
__________________
Need to rent camera gear in Vancouver BC?
Check me out at camerarentalsvancouver.com
Dylan Couper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 21st, 2005, 02:15 AM   #9
Major Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 328
As ive said in one of my earlier posts about 2 years ago.

I felt that Canon was deceiving its buyers (the less knowledgable ones) when they spoke about that Steven Soderbergh film "Full Frontal" saying that it was shot with an xl1.

Basically saying that if you had an xl1 you could get that look. But, they failed to mention that the xl1 footage was really transferred to 35mm film giving it a true progressive feel and film grain,(even though the picture looked lousy, i am much more concercerned with the feel ie.filmlook- bad film all be it.)

It makes a huge difference, if you dont belive me, go and look at Blair witch on DVD as Heath is suggesting.
Ben Gurvich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 21st, 2005, 04:26 AM   #10
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Centreville Va
Posts: 1,828
Session 9 was a very good horror/suspense movie. Though I knew it was shot on a cinealta (I read the article in MovieMaker, or FilmMaker, one of those), as all good films, you forget and don't care what it was shot with. I do remember in the article the issues they had with lenses.
Joe Carney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 21st, 2005, 09:58 AM   #11
MPS Digital Studios
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Palm Beach County, Florida
Posts: 8,531
I've seen stuff from the XL-1 blown up to film that looks good, but I have to say, Full Frontal's XL-1s footage was B-A-D.

heath
__________________
My Final Cut Pro X blog
Heath McKnight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 21st, 2005, 11:54 AM   #12
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Belgium
Posts: 2,195
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heath McKnight
I've seen stuff from the XL-1 blown up to film that looks good, but I have to say, Full Frontal's XL-1s footage was B-A-D.

heath
I know this has been discussed a 1000 times, but I found 28 days later to look really stunning, especially in the second part. I still remember seeing it in theatres, and my technical knowledge wasn't great (I wasn't a member here, didn't know a lot about dv, exept that the movie was shot on dvcams) but I know people didn't really care for it, or noticed it. Okay, sometimes you notice it, but it really looks good.

But as I said, I'd better shut up, this has already been discussed to death in the threads about 28 days later.
I haven't seen Full Frontal, only heard bad things about it.
Mathieu Ghekiere is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 21st, 2005, 11:58 AM   #13
MPS Digital Studios
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Palm Beach County, Florida
Posts: 8,531
Yes, I definitely agree. And yes, we've talked about this a lot, but it's still fun.

heath
__________________
My Final Cut Pro X blog
Heath McKnight is offline   Reply
Reply

DV Info Net refers all where-to-buy and where-to-rent questions exclusively to these trusted full line dealers and rental houses...

Professional Video
(800) 833-4801
Portland, OR

B&H Photo Video
(866) 521-7381
New York, NY

Z.G.C.
(973) 335-4460
Mountain Lakes, NJ

Abel Cine Tech
(888) 700-4416
N.Y. NY & L.A. CA

Precision Camera
(800) 677-1023
Austin, TX

DV Info Net also encourages you to support local businesses and buy from an authorized dealer in your neighborhood.
  You are here: DV Info Net > And Now, For Something Completely Different... > The TOTEM Poll: Totally Off Topic, Everything Media

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

 



Google
 

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:50 PM.


DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2017 The Digital Video Information Network