Time Lapse panning - Page 2 at DVinfo.net

Go Back   DV Info Net > Special Interest Areas > Under Water, Over Land

Under Water, Over Land
Tools & Techniques for Nature, Outdoors, Wildlife & Underwater Videography.

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old January 7th, 2007, 11:48 PM   #16
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,363

Thanks for that one. It never entered my head to dream that up on my own.
Bob Hart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 8th, 2007, 12:20 AM   #17
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Charleston, West Virginia
Posts: 131
I have my doubts that the sand or water device would work unless you used a pulley and pan head with an extremely low friction rating. I can see anything turning that slowly having big problems with 'slip-and-stick', IE, jerky motion. Come to think of it, that could be a major obstacle with any device trying to move a heavy camera that slowly. You'd have a lot of starting friction in the pan head to overcome. Any driving device you connected would tend to repeatedly build up tension before overcoming the starting friction, resulting in tiny bursts of movement rather than a smooth, flowing pan. At a normal panning speed this isn't a problem, since once you overcome the starting friction, the 'moving' friction comes in to play. At those extremely slow speeds, you would really never get the head into 'moving' friction. To overcome this, you would need some sort of zero-friction pan head, like a block of wood floating in water.

Mounting the camera on a large lazy susan-like disc and connecting a clock motor gearbox to the outside edge might work. Sounds like a fun project for next weekend!
Dan Robinson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 8th, 2007, 05:18 AM   #18
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 857
I don't think pulley stiction should be much of an issue, you can easily find one with low mass and the tension to pull the arm can be quite high. Stiction of the head is definitely an issue, but I think the issue applies as well to the motorized drive - both solutions need to apply sufficient force to move the head at a constant rate and a decent head is assumed. It's possible to choose a weight sufficient to do the job with the dropping weight method.

I really like the water clock approach which could be highly adjustable. The motorized solution would of course be easier to use, a stepper motor and timer control is the usual approach in telescope tracking solutions. There is also a device called the "barn door drive" which is a poor man's astrophotography solution. It uses two pieces of wood hinged at one end and a threaded rod turned at a constant rate (e.g. quarter turn every 15 min) to adjust separation of the free ends (with hinge axis pointing at North Star).
Jim Michael is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 12th, 2007, 02:38 PM   #19
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 39
Check out my solution... very inexpensive too: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ni89TBOTCUA
Jay Burlage is offline   Reply

DV Info Net refers all where-to-buy and where-to-rent questions exclusively to these trusted full line dealers and rental houses...

(800) 223-2500
New York, NY

B&H Photo Video
(866) 521-7381
New York, NY

Texas Media Systems
(512) 440-1400
Austin, TX

Precision Camera
(800) 677-1023
Austin, TX

(800) 323-2325
Mineola, NY

DV Info Net also encourages you to support local businesses and buy from an authorized dealer in your neighborhood.
  You are here: DV Info Net > Special Interest Areas > Under Water, Over Land

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:12 PM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2018 The Digital Video Information Network