DV Info Net

DV Info Net (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/)
-   What Happens in Vegas... (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/what-happens-vegas/)
-   -   Computer purchase help. (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/what-happens-vegas/106749-computer-purchase-help.html)

Simon Denny October 29th, 2007 01:23 AM

Computer purchase help.
 
Hope I have the right fourm for this as I use Vegas.
I will be upgrading my PC and would like some advice on what others are using?
This might help me in the selection upgrade procces.

I use a Sony PD 170 soon to get the Sony Z1.
Vegas 6.0d soon to upgrade.

My PC has has taken it's last render and is now only good for surfing the net.

I guess I would need to be up and running for HDV.

Cheers
Simon

Brian Luce October 29th, 2007 05:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Simon Ash (Post 766499)
Hope I have the right fourm for this as I use Vegas.
I will be upgrading my PC and would like some advice on what others are using?
This might help me in the selection upgrade procces.

I use a Sony PD 170 soon to get the Sony Z1.
Vegas 6.0d soon to upgrade.

My PC has has taken it's last render and is now only good for surfing the net.

I guess I would need to be up and running for HDV.

Cheers
Simon

Unless things have changed in the last two months, I advise avoiding Vista.

Mike Kujbida October 29th, 2007 08:10 AM

Simon, I upgraded to a quad core this spring and remain VERY happy with it.
I based my machine's specs on John Rofrano's who based his on John Cline's.
I didn't bother with a RAID array. Instead, I went with a 250 GB Seagate SATA for drive C and 2 x 500 GB. Seagate SATAs for drives D & E.
OS was XP Pro.

Simon Denny October 29th, 2007 01:23 PM

Thanks guys.
I was going to go with XP Pro also.

Chris Barnes November 27th, 2007 12:29 PM

Another question?
 
I have looked at the list of equipment in John's computer and havesearched around looking for a system that gets good performance. I really don't to live in Hardware He!! and would like to find a reasonably priced Quad core system. Of those I can get information on, I don't find any with the motherboard used in John's system. So my question is - What is lost by not using that motherboard? I have a limited budget, but want to maximize my performance. Are there other motherboards that are recommended?

Thanks in advance for any help.

Chris

Kenneth Johnson November 27th, 2007 01:29 PM

Simon Get a Mac. After being a windows nerd for 10 years I went with a Mac 6 months ago and could not be happier. Less problems. I run 2x30inch plus a crt monitor at the same time and love the work flow. no crashes and faster editing. only took about 1 month of using it to get used to the differences. give it a try

ken

Edward Troxel November 27th, 2007 01:43 PM

Ken, Vegas won't run on a Mac unless he runs Windows on it too. So he'll still be using Windows even if it's on Mac hardware.

Kenneth Johnson November 27th, 2007 02:43 PM

I stand corrected. But IMO, after having spent all the years on a pc I am loving the mac. might be worth him looking at FCP. If going to invest in a new system Simon, it might be worth the trip to the mall and visit the apple store before spending money on a new pc. most of the programs that I used on windows are available on a mac. Have not installed windows on the mac yet and most likely will not at this point. FCP was very easy to learn. I also shoot with a pd170, canon xl2 and jvc 5100. all connect by firewire to the mac and I do lots of live capture that way. pd170 is a great camera


Now if I could figure out a way to capture all three cameras at once to the mac I would be in sitting pretty

ken

Seth Bloombaum November 27th, 2007 05:00 PM

Ken, I use FCP and Vegas and respect your point of view. I've chosen Vegas as my primary editor, but I can certainly see why many other people would choose FCP.

In my experience this forum is not anti-mac or anti-fcp (there have been some interesting and fair discussions on the subject), but a suggestion to "switch to mac and fcp" is not IMO particularly helpful to someone who uses vegas and wants advice on upgrading their system.

Glad the mac/fcp is working out for you - it's a good system.

Seth Bloombaum November 27th, 2007 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Barnes (Post 782862)
... Are there other motherboards that are recommended?

I'm a big fan of genuine Intel motherboards. A lot of people went to ASUS & such when they introduced SLI tech (a good way to get 4 monitors), but now the Intel mobos have it too. And you get all that compatibility...

I've built two this way, the current one is a D965WH. It's been totally stable and crashless with Vegas and many other apps. Although I only put it together in January for a Core2 Duo, these things change fast.

It looks like there's a whole series of 965 chipset boards for about $100. Also look into a 775 series board to support a quad core processor, especially if you're editing HD.

Stuart Campbell November 27th, 2007 05:26 PM

your money or your mac!
 
Ken,

I'm sure there are thousands of people out there who'd love to have a mac running FCP. However, for the price of a basic, decent mac running FCP you could just about buy the fastest most powerful pc out there!

I'm running a Pentium dual core 2.67 processor with two 500gb raid 0 structure drives for video and 2g of memory. I have an additional 80g drive for software and xp. I added one of the best graphics cards around to run two dvi widescreen monitors.

Apart from a series of crashes caused by bad video format on a rushes tape some time ago I've had absolutely NO problems whatsoever. Everything that's cut on this edit only system is HDV and I find render times more than satisfactory and performance perfectly adequate. The edit machine cost me less than 1200 pounds 12 months ago (about 2000 dollars). You can get a better spec machine for less now!

I've always been a mac user and I love them, and I'll be honest, some mac users never really admit to the crashes, and I had a few! I find PC's equally reliable. I'd rather have an all singing and dancing mac suite running FCP, but my company budget just won't allow it right now! In the mean time, the PC edit station works just fine and I see no reason to change! Furthermore, I find Vegas is actually better to work with than FCP!!

Kenneth Johnson November 27th, 2007 06:41 PM

Stuart
Thanks for the reply. I have never worked with vegas and only know premiere pro and fcp. I am curious how much your system cost you. I did look at a good editing pc but decided to try the mac. i am very happy with it,, might also be just the change from windows. I have found it more stable than windows but at this point I only edit photos and video on it. Maybe in another year I will start to have problems as I have heard other mac users have had but for now it is a clean machine. I did put an investment into it over 4k plus monitor but just wanted to purchase one machine for the next several years and it seems to be reliable at this point. what editing machine did you finaly purchase and how is it set up??

thanks ken

Stuart Campbell November 28th, 2007 01:32 AM

12 months ago I had a 'build to order' pc company build me a;

Intel Pentium Dual Core (or Core 2) E6700 (2x2.67Ghz)
ASUS p5wdeluxehd motherboard
2 Gig RAM
80Gig Sata Drive for data (XP, Vegas, Cinescore, Photoshop etc)
2 x 500Gig Sata Drives for video storage RAID 0 configured
NVidia GeForce 7950 GT (dual DVI and HD) 512 Mb
Decent Audio card (can't remember)!!
4 port Firewire Card
Some extra nice cooling (can't remember what it is sorry)
Top spec DVD writer (can't remember what that is either, I'm useless)!

I then purchased 2 x Dell 2007wfp 20" monitors

I already had a sony 9" CRT field monitor which I use for reference and preview and an analogue to dv converter box to wire up all the vtrs (HDV, BetaCamSP, DVCpro and svhs all switched using a patch bay jack field). I wired in a Spirit Folio audio desk for monitoring and plugged in the speakers and I was away!

Sadly, the CRT has given up the ghost since (it's had a hard life with me over the past 10 years) and the Spirit is showing signs of age too. So those two things are to be replaced!

The PC only cost me 1100 UK pounds (less than 2000 dollars then) which is (or was) excellent value. As I said, I wanted to build a mac suite, but was looking at over 4000 pounds (7500 dollars) including the monitors, there was no decision to make really.

As I keep the machine as an edit only terminal, I have a hassle free life with it, which is great. The only issues arise with bad rushes (had a big problem once which turned out to be hdv format changes on the tape).

For the price and it's reliability so far it was the right choice.

The mac would have definitely looked better!, and may probably even have performed better, but I'm still able to feed my family...which is the most important factor for me!!

I'm sure you can now get a Quad Core and more fancy bits for the same price, or even less! If you are interested in the UK company its

http://www.pcspecialist.co.uk

They were excellent, and knew exactly what I needed once I specified it as an edit machine! Build quality superb, quick delivery and excellent support to solve a couple of minor issues on first start ups.

Simon Denny November 28th, 2007 04:18 AM

Thanks guys for your input. I'm staying with Vegas as I have invested all my time and effort into this software and what I cant do with it I will use After Effects etc....
I have looked at going down the Mac route but it's very expensive here in OZ and I can do the same on PC as what a Mac will do. Who knows one day I might have to go Mac.

I have sourced all my new components and this is what I'm doing.

Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 2.4GHZ 1066mhz
ASUS S775 Quad core P35 motherboard
2 Gig RAM Corsair 800Mhz
160Gig Sata Drive for data
I have other Sata drives for storage
XP Pro
NVidia GeForce 7950 GT DVI and HD 512 Mb
Audio card, just a cheap one.

This should see me through for a while and it has'nt cost an arm & leg.

Cheers
Simon

Renton Maclachlan November 28th, 2007 12:46 PM

About a month ago I got a new machine with the following:

Core 2 Duo E6850, 3.00GHz, 1333MHz FSB, Socket 775, 32/64-Bit, Retail pack with fan

GA-P35-DS3P, Socket 775, Intel P35 Express Chipset, 1333MHz FSB, 4xDIMM DDR2, 2xPCIe-16, 2xPCI, 3xPCIe-1, 8xUSB2, Firewire, Audio, ATA, RAID, ATX

2x (4 altogether = 2mb) Kingston HyperX 1GB DDR2-1066 Non-ECC Kit CL5 1066MHz CL5 (5-5-5-15) Kit - two 512MB Modules

Sapphire HD 2400 XT Video Card, Radeon HD 2400 XT, 256MB, DDR3, PCIe-16, TV out, DVI, HDTV, CrossFire, Dual head

Raidmax X1 ATX Mid Tower Case, 520W PSU, Side Window, 3 fans, Silver/White

I already had an internal 400gb drive but decided to get another one - a Sata 2 as my primary one so as not to slow anything up. I also have a 500gb and a 150gb drive.

It goes like a rocket. Cut rendering on one project from 16.5 hours to 2hrs 10 mins.

Simon Denny November 28th, 2007 01:36 PM

Hi Renton,
Nice render times, how much did this cost to put together?

I will have a look at the Core 2 Duo E6850, 3.00GHz seems to be a bit quicker.

Cheers
Simon

Renton Maclachlan November 28th, 2007 07:11 PM

All up I paid $NZ1560 assembled.

I didn't choose the bits. My son in law who is a techo just went to the www.ascent.co.nz site (a brilliant online supplier here) and went through and picked out the bits that looked the best for the price. We analysed the options as he did so. We didn't go for the absolute latest/fastest because of them being over priced at the mo.

The case has three case fans + the power supply fan and the best bit is they have blue lights on the fans!!! :-)

My old machine was a 1.7gb job.

Jeff Harper November 29th, 2007 12:09 AM

Quad core is the way to go for me...check out the Dell outlet and HP. Quad core is twice as fast rendering as duo core.

I also agree that to suggest to someone to switch to MAC when they are asking about Vegas and windows based hardware is not quite appropriate, but I certainly understand it.

There are legions of FCP fans out there, virtually all my competitors use Macs.

Scott Brickert November 30th, 2007 01:03 PM

Hey Renton,
that's a good looking machine.

Based on this article at Tom's Hardware [http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/09/...re/page3.html] I'm looking at a similar setup using a reliably overclocked E2160 running at 3.2GHz. Accomodating the 45nm processors allows a full upgrade path to the QX6800 quad's running at 3GHz (currently around US$1000 !).

I discovered the hard way the major role processor speed plays in Preview. The ol' P4 3.2GHz provided nearly 30fps preview, while an E24xx C2D with two processors at 1.8GHz was running 10-18fps preview rates, even though the FSB and memory speeds were 25% higher. Rendering and Preview are definitely two different processes.

Was hoping to get away with just upgrading the board, CPU and Ram, but it looks like I'll need a new vidcard supporting 16x PCIe. Then there's the question of power supply.

How quiet is the Raidmax 3 fan box?

I also recommend visiting the Dell Outlet store, particularly if you just want to plug it in, install your apps, and get to work. The XPS I had for a couple weeks was virtually silent. One drawback to them is the rarity of XP boxes.

Jeff Harper November 30th, 2007 01:09 PM

While the XPS systems ARE nice, I found I got lots for my money with Dell when purchasing a Precision buisness class machine. The warranty alone on Precsions is fantastic, and tech support is much better than with most of their other machines (I don't know about support for the XPS but the precision techs know Raid, etc. and you get through so much faster. Even though I know hardware pretty well, sometimes I had questions about my system and they are just a phone call away.

Jon Omiatek November 30th, 2007 02:09 PM

I am running vegas 7e on a Quad Core(8cores) Mac with no issues booted in Windows XP. I love that I can use it with FCP Studio 2 or PC for Vegas.

Jon

Jeff Harper November 30th, 2007 02:14 PM

wow, great setup Jon. By the way, I was wrong, and I'm sorry. I don't expect you to accept it, but at least it's been said. BTW, nice website.

Sean Seah December 1st, 2007 05:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jon Omiatek (Post 784920)
I am running vegas 7e on a Quad Core(8cores) Mac with no issues booted in Windows XP. I love that I can use it with FCP Studio 2 or PC for Vegas.

Jon

Jon, watz yr setup on the mac pro? So u have FCPS2 together with Vegas8? I was considering that too but the mac pro is one expensive machine..

Renton Maclachlan December 2nd, 2007 11:03 PM

"How quiet is the Raidmax 3 fan box?" Scott Brickert.

It doesn't seem to be very noisy - at least I can live with it quite ok.

I can't record audio (something I've done a lot of in the past with my old set up) satisfactorily to the new computer though because of the noise.

Joe Sirbak December 3rd, 2007 02:13 PM

Here's an $800 quad-core that has been offered with a $150 rebate three times already this fall - bringing the total price to $650!

http://www.officedepot.com/ddSKU.do?level=SK&id=592945

You might want to add some RAM, an external HDD or two, and a video card, but this is a very affordable PC to get your system started. I got it, and even before any of my planned upgrades, saw 6x (!) faster render times compared to my old dinosaur of a system.

For Vegas, quad-core is the way to go, and this PC shows that you don't need to break the bank to go quad-core.

Jeff Harper December 3rd, 2007 02:22 PM

I have a Quad core I paid $2K for it....while I agree on a video card, I don't even know if I'd bother to add RAM, what a great system for the money...I'd buy it in a heart beat. No it's not "perfect", but it will render quickly and preview great! What else do you need?

Kim Olsson December 3rd, 2007 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jon Omiatek (Post 784920)
I am running vegas 7e on a Quad Core(8cores) Mac with no issues booted in Windows XP. I love that I can use it with FCP Studio 2 or PC for Vegas.

Jon

I thought Vegas only could use four cores ??
Like in Preferences - Video - maximum rendering threads = 4...

Terry Esslinger December 3rd, 2007 04:44 PM

The $150 rebate ended Nov 21st:>(

Jason Robinson December 3rd, 2007 06:03 PM

Ahhhh
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kim Olsson (Post 786580)
I thought Vegas only could use four cores ??
Like in Preferences - Video - maximum rendering threads = 4...

But keep in mind that all that disc IO has its own Operating System thread. The OS will still have hefty overhead just to feed those cores the necessary data. An 8 core system might indeed be overkill though.... not like it hurts to have an extra quad core Xeon in the mobo. :-)

Joe Sirbak December 4th, 2007 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Terry Esslinger (Post 786656)
The $150 rebate ended Nov 21st:>(

Yes, but I was shopping around for awhile before pulling the trigger. The $150 rebate was offered at least 2 (and I believe 3) separate times over the past 2 months, so there's a decent chance the rebate will be back sometime in the coming weeks.

Jeff Harper December 4th, 2007 10:35 AM

Quad-core processors are inexpensive now, and I suspect will only drop further after Christmas. I have nothing to back that up but it seems logical to me.

just found this http://www.staples.com/webapp/wcs/st...:CG71:CL161746

Mike Brennan December 4th, 2007 09:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kenneth Johnson (Post 783088)
Stuart
Thanks for the reply. I have never worked with vegas and only know premiere pro and fcp. I am curious how much your system cost you. I did look at a good editing pc but decided to try the mac. i am very happy with it,, might also be just the change from windows. I have found it more stable than windows but at this point I only edit photos and video on it. Maybe in another year I will start to have problems as I have heard other mac users have had but for now it is a clean machine. I did put an investment into it over 4k plus monitor but just wanted to purchase one machine for the next several years and it seems to be reliable at this point.

thanks ken

Hi Ken.

Not to turn this into a Mac/PC debate, but I use Vegas at home on a PC
and Premier on a Mac at work. I HATE the Mac and Premier !

I have more crashes and glitches on that Mac than on any PC, ever.
I am also not a fan of Premier. I can work much faster and easier in Vegas.

I never worked in FCP, but next week my primary worlplace will be installing
a new top of the line Mac with the full FCP suite. ( I didn't have a say in it )
Once I get my feet wet with that system, I'll chime back in and let you know how it compares to Vegas.

But with that being said.... I just upgraded to Vegas 8, and I'm also looking for a new PC. IMHO, you can't match the performance, price, and ease of use of Vegas running on a good PC.

JMHO,
Mike.

Jeff Harper December 4th, 2007 10:04 PM

Please do get back with us. I would be extremely interested to know an experienced Vegas user's opinion of the new FCP.

Miguel Avila December 4th, 2007 10:37 PM

HP Workstation 6400
 
I'm not much of a builder, and was recently in the market for a new system, so after reading a bit on the videoguys.com website, I decided to purchase an HP workstation. I didn't have the budget to invest in a new system so I went to the outlet and purchased a refurbished unit... it came out to be shy of $1,400usd incluiding tax, shipping and a free 19" lcd HP monitor...

It has 2 Dual Xeon Processors @ 2.00GHz, 2 gigs of memory, XP Pro... (dont get vista!!!) and 80gigs Hard drive... no raid, I just use externals... the video card, from what I read at Videoguys.com, does not have to be super powerful is a simple nvidia Quadro NVS 285 with 128mb of memory... so that's my setup... it's a really fast computer and it cut my render times dramatically. My previous setup was a dell dimension 5100 Pentium 4, 3ghz, 1.5 gigs of memory.. so yes, it was a big upgrade, and I think I got a good deal.

Jeff Harper December 4th, 2007 10:40 PM

Glad your happy with your purchase. I looked at the Xeon's, but went with Q6600. I'm sure your system is MUCH faster than your old one.

Simon Denny December 5th, 2007 12:31 AM

Hi Mike,
I would love to see a comparision between the two NLE.

Things I would be interested are.
Time line, work flow approach,
Is it better having an extra preview screen to edit,cut.
Adding color,efx's
The audio time line, compressing,repairs,noise reduction.
How easy is it to do things that Vegas does?
Rendering.

Anything else I have forgot please add.

Cheers
Simon

Alastair Brown December 5th, 2007 12:40 AM

HP Pavilion PC system A6150 Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 2GB 320GB +80GB pocket media drive GF 8400 DVD RW card reader Vista Home Premium

For anyone thats in the UK, the above system can be had for £448 at the mo which is an INCREDIBLE deal. The full spec of this PC is really good for the money. YES, you could upgrade it even further but, as a base, it's a corker.

If you just Google the detials above, the deal I'm talking about comes up at the top.

Simon Denny December 5th, 2007 12:52 AM

Looks good Alastair,
Wish they had something in Australia that cheap... oh well.

Cheers
Simon

Lee Brennan December 15th, 2007 04:06 PM

Computer purchase info
 
Hi,
I am currently using a Compaq Presario with Vegas 6 and Particle Illusion 3. Needless to say it is really slow -particularly using PI3 in Vegas. I was recently offered a used Alienware Aurora 7500 computer with a dual core AMD processer. I looked on the Alienware site and that particular computer seems very fast and powerful but they mostly talk about using those computers for gaming. Would a computer for gaming work well for video? Does anyone use or have any info on them? Thanks for any help.

Jeff Harper December 15th, 2007 04:16 PM

That was a fine computer in 2005, and still isn't bad, but you can purchase a Quad processor system for less than $1000, which would likely be twice as fast.

Yes it would work fine, but be sure to not overpay for a dated processor. The seller is likely selling it to upgrade to a faster processor, and since the primary tasks of Vegas depend upon your processor, I would just be careful. You can (as you may or may not know) purchase external HDs (500Gb for $100) so if the Alienware has nice hard drive that needn't be a reason to buy it either.

You also do not benefit much from a killer video card, as I just replaced a fairly high end card with a cheap one (not TOO cheap mind you) and see NO difference. Vegas just can't benefit from high end graphics.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:22 AM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network