MTS vs UpShift vs NeoScene
*.MTS file
Original length of Video = 23:27;12 File Size = 1.97 GB Time-line Scrub-ability = Poor Quality = Very Good - Good for conversion to DVD Re-render Quality = Poor Playback on Time-line on Core I7 (Best-Full) = Full Speed Upshift Upshift Convert Time from *.MTS file = 17:14 File Size = 8.45 GB Time-line Scrub-ability = very Good Quality = Good - Very Good for conversion to DVD Re-render Quality = Fair Playback on Time-line on Core I7 (Best-Full) = Full Speed Upshift Settings: Preset = Low Speed/High Quality Bitrate = 50 Mbps Bitrate Control = Constant Keyframe = 1 GOP Size = 1 Interlace = Copy from Input UpShift using Proxy Quality Convert time from *.MTS file = 11:40 File Size = 1.75 GB Time-line Scrub-ability = Best Quality = Good for files destined for Internet - Poor for conversion to DVD Re-render Quality = Poor Playback on Time-line on Core I7 (Best-Full) = Full Speed NeoScene NeoScene Convert Time from *.MTS file = 5:45 File Size = 11.2 GB Time-line Scrub-ability = Very Good Quality = Best - Best for conversion to DVD Re-render Quality = Best Playback on Time-line on Core I7 (Best-Full) = Full Speed NeoScene Settings: Quality = Medium Output Frame Format = Maintain source frame format While Upshift can achieve good quality, the time it takes to convert a file vs NeoScene is almost 3 times as long! Quality is close to the same but NeoScene files can be re-rendered multiple times. Upshift cost less initially but a whole lot more in time spent converting! And time is money! So in the long run Upshift is far more expensive than NeoScene! *.MTS files have no conversion time but use quite a bit more editing time because of the poor time-line scrubbing and possible preview issues. And the winner is NeoScene! I regress on any previous negative statements I have said about NeoScene! Danny Fye VidMus Video - Music Productions |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:11 AM. |
DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network