|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 18th, 2010, 09:23 AM
|
#1 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 216
|
Optimizing video for posting online
Fellow Vegans,
It seems like all the video sites have changed their formats since last I uploaded a video, and my latest project looks good on myspace and vimeo, but plays slowly on anything but the fastest PCs, and looked terrible on youtube despite me staying within the formats they suggest (so I deleted it). I also just upgraded from V8 to V10 and wonder if V10 offers any new solutions. The Vimeo and myspace uploads may be viewed here: Sneak Preview of Execution At Dawn Video by CATCH A RISING BULLET - Myspace Video The format size is 1280x720 24P rendered in wmv format which seemed to work the best. Suggestions? Brian |
|
|
|
December 18th, 2010, 03:42 PM
|
#2 |
|
Trustee
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Central Coast Australia
Posts: 1,046
|
oooooo, Very intense .I like it. well done.
Are you saying, you think the quality is not up to scratch? Because it looks like Vimeo has displayed what you gave it. Did you mean to stretch the 4x3 to 16x9? or is that the problem? If it is don't give them non square pixels, render everything to square pixels and it will be fine, 720x576 becomes 1048x576, etc
__________________
http://vimeo.com/livewebvideo |
|
|
|
|
December 18th, 2010, 03:54 PM
|
#3 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 216
|
Vimeo did a nice job so long as your running a fast machine. I'm looking for ways to keep the same look on slower machine. I see previews all the time which look outstanding on my old XP system and there must be some secret.
The larger problem was Youtube which resulted in a severely pixellated lower rez quality despite rendereing out to several differnt formats all of which used square pixels. Brian |
|
|
|
|
December 18th, 2010, 04:38 PM
|
#4 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 628
|
This one was a 10mbps Sony AVC mpeg4 on youtube. Comes out pretty much like the source and vimeo looks about the same.
YouTube - The old Huntridge Theater - Las Vegas This one was a huge 30mpbs Blu-ray Mpeg2. This one looks better on vimeo. YouTube - Las Vegas - Citiscape (1080p)
__________________
EX3, Q6600 Quad core PC - Vista 64, Vegas 8.1 64bit, SR11 b-cam |
|
|
|
|
December 20th, 2010, 09:09 AM
|
#5 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 216
|
Erik,
Was the first clip specifically rendered with the Sony AVC instead of the Main Concept? What was the original format (camera, codec, etc.) Brian |
|
|
|
|
December 20th, 2010, 09:55 PM
|
#6 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 628
|
Yes it was Sony AVC, not main concept. Both clips started life as 35mbps XDcam EX MXF files. Hope that helps.
__________________
EX3, Q6600 Quad core PC - Vista 64, Vegas 8.1 64bit, SR11 b-cam |
|
|
|
|
December 21st, 2010, 06:04 AM
|
#7 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 216
|
Is there an advantage to the Sony version over the MainConcept?
|
|
|
|
|
December 21st, 2010, 09:25 AM
|
#8 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 628
|
Not that I know of It's just something I've been using for a while now.
__________________
EX3, Q6600 Quad core PC - Vista 64, Vegas 8.1 64bit, SR11 b-cam |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
