DV Info Net

DV Info Net (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/)
-   All Things Audio (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/all-things-audio/)
-   -   you have helped me narrow it down to a shotgun: Sanken CS-1 or mkh416? (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/all-things-audio/101654-you-have-helped-me-narrow-down-shotgun-sanken-cs-1-mkh416.html)

Lonnie Bell August 19th, 2007 04:51 PM

you have helped me narrow it down to a shotgun: Sanken CS-1 or mkh416?
 
Hi,
It's time to add a shotgun to my arsenal. I have a decent hypercardoid (akg ck93 - and will eventually look at the cmc641 when i can afford it), but am presently looking for that longer reach item - thus a shotgun. Probably will use it mostly outdoors and always on a boom (probably in a blimp) in a variety of conditions or at least when a hyper is not appropriate...

and at the same $700-$800 that puts me at a Sanken CS-1 or a used Senny mkh416...

what would you pros recommend?

thanks,
Lonnie

Mike Peter Reed August 20th, 2007 04:16 AM

The CS-3e has a great reputation and would be my mic of choice if I were buying today. I'd have to do more research on the CS-1 (which I guess is what you're doing) but "blind" I'd go for a 416, and probably a second-hand one at that.

From Microphone Data:
"The CS-1 is a short rifle microphone intended for film and TV but likely to find uses elsewhere too. The microphone is exceptionally short and light while retaining high directivity that is remarkably consistent - greater than 20dB front-to-back ratio across almost the entire frequency response. The CS-1 is small enough to fit onto ENG cameras but can also act as a high-quality boom microphone. The capsule is a Sanken original using a square diaphragm DC biased condenser design which can sustain SPLs as high as 137dB with only 1% distortion."

Ty Ford August 20th, 2007 04:11 PM

cs-3e

Ty Ford

Dan Brockett August 20th, 2007 11:32 PM

I agree...
 
With Ty. Doing a huge mic article/review/test right now and the Sankens are emerging as an early front runner. Although those Schoeps are sweet but double your budget.

Dan

Wayne Brissette August 21st, 2007 04:37 AM

Also look around at the used market. I was able to pick up a nice Neumann KMR-82i that was gently used (OK, not as gently used as I wanted, but it was from a rental house that was going out of business) in this price range, and shotgun mics do show up from time to time on the market.

Wayne

Lonnie Bell August 22nd, 2007 12:33 AM

Alright guys...
If I extend my budget to the price of the CS-3e, that also puts us in the same price bracket as an MKH60.

So which is it MKH60 or CS-3e for an all around exterior location mic with reach?

Mike Peter Reed August 22nd, 2007 01:41 AM

CS-3e in my book

Steven Fokkinga August 22nd, 2007 11:57 AM

I got a used, but pristine 416 for 400. If you buy from a soundguy who knows how to treat his/her equipment, you'll find them in pretty good state for that price.

Steven

Meryem Ersoz August 22nd, 2007 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lonnie Bell (Post 732329)
Alright guys...
If I extend my budget to the price of the CS-3e, that also puts us in the same price bracket as an MKH60.

So which is it MKH60 or CS-3e for an all around exterior location mic with reach?

is anyone willing to elaborate on why the CS-3e wins out over the mkh-60? i've been eyeing the mkh-60 but have really not had good luck finding much info about it. lots of folks seems to say "not as good as the mkh416" or "not as good as sanken" but i really can't get a handle on why this is the prevailing wisdom....

dan, when/where will you be posting your findings?

Steve Oakley August 28th, 2007 04:58 PM

I really really really dislike 416's. they are thin and cold sounding. the mkh60 was the replacement for the 416. I got to hear some side by side comparisons and the 416 was the worst sounding one of the bunch. sankens are nice, shoeps better.

Ty Ford August 28th, 2007 07:16 PM

With all due respect, if you think 416s are thin and cold, something is wrong with the particular 416s you have been exposed to .

The 416 has quite a bottom boost. I normally roll it off just to get it out of the way. The MKH 60 OTOH, to me and others, while obviously quieter, sounds very sterile.

More reviews in the Article Archive on my website.

Regards,

Ty Ford

Steve Oakley August 28th, 2007 07:58 PM

I'd have to say about a dozen or more 416's. rentals, personal gear of audio guy, ect. A few months ago a side by side with several other shotguns. In that particular side by side, the 416 was the least pleasing and consistant with other times I've used them. 60 had more bottom in that one, and warmer sounding.

Ty Ford August 28th, 2007 11:12 PM

Um, rentals, that may answer the question. What mixer(s)?

It would be interesting to confer with the guys over on ramps about your reaction.

Regards,

Ty Ford

Lonnie Bell August 29th, 2007 01:32 PM

ramps? what is ramps - another reference site?

googled "ramps" to no avail... what's ramps?

Steve House August 29th, 2007 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lonnie Bell (Post 736415)
ramps? what is ramps - another reference site?

googled "ramps" to no avail... what's ramps?

A Usenet newsgroup where a lot of film industry and broadcast sound folks hang out - rec.arts.movies.production.sound

A lot of good info to be found in rec.audio.pro as well.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:05 PM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2021 The Digital Video Information Network