Seth Bloombaum |
December 1st, 2008 11:06 AM |
I've done this technique for stereo mixes, using variously an ORTF array of two small diaphram cardoids or an M/S mic.
In my experience it's been a little hit-and-miss on mic placement, due to lots of variables outside my control and the difficulty of monitoring.
If the hall sounds good, and the P.A. folks are doing a good job, then a stereo mic in the right place can be fantastic. Do you have your choice of where to put the mic? Can you place it in the middle of audience seating? "The right place" for primary use in the mix will usually be about 1/3 back in the house, center. If you can wipe out 2 to 4 prime seats, great. For providing room sound reverb efx perhaps 1/3 to 2/3rds back in the house - gotta' listen to know.
Finding the right spot is a problem - you really need to be there for a sound check. It's hard to judge placement listening on headphones, but you can do it. Ideally, you'd be in an isolated room listeing on monitors and on walkie-talkie to an assistant moving the mic. If your mic is in the middle of the audience you'll not be able to move it during the performance.
If your mic is back at a camera position at the back of the house it's still worth laying down the tracks, but you may find it more useful for an applause mic than for adding as room reverb during the music. I recently mixed a recording that was about 12 instrument tracks and a very high quality m/s mic at the mix position (3/4 back or so). After a lot of hair-tearing I junked the m/s tracks and used a software reverb/echo instead, and I'm quite happy with the final mix. OTOH, I've most often found this technique very useful when there are good choices on mic placement.
I don't know what you'd do for surround channels, but unless you are in an exceptional hall with good mic placement you may find more success with surround generated with post efx.
|