![]() |
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
|
Re: Which fuzzy wind screen is better Rode or Rycote?
any promos still going on?
|
Re: Which fuzzy wind screen is better Rode or Rycote?
4 years later, the instant thought would be no, but Guy always has good things happening ..?
Cheers. |
Re: Which fuzzy wind screen is better Rode or Rycote?
haha its worth asking
i just bought a windscreen and am thinking about a blimp |
Re: Which fuzzy wind screen is better Rode or Rycote?
The Rode Blimp is a great choice, clever guys and gals at Rode, the name 'Blimp' has gone into audio folklore.
Another 4 yr old thread :) You could make one of these, mine is still going strong .. http://www.dvinfo.net/forum/all-thin...ode-blimp.html Cheers. |
Re: Which fuzzy wind screen is better Rode or Rycote?
I have found the Wincutter range to be very good and great value for money
Reducing wind noise on video |
Re: Which fuzzy wind screen is better Rode or Rycote?
But to answer the original question - Rycote is the best as they designed the hairy cover originally, understand the science behind the design and *how* and *why* it works.
All the others are copies. If you don't fully understand the science you can get higher levels of high frequency loss and other problems. In the old days Rycote did not properly patent and protect their ideas, which is why they were copied so much. Now they have patented the design of the "Lyre" suspension, which is why it has not been copied and others still use copies of old Rycote designs. |
Re: Which fuzzy wind screen is better Rode or Rycote?
Everyone knows just because anything was first last century, doesn't mean that 45 years later it's still the best.
Time moves on, there are some great audio windscreen products available now. Cheers. |
Re: Which fuzzy wind screen is better Rode or Rycote?
Quote:
Which then immediately gets copied....... Rycote invented the Windjammer, Rycote invented the Softie, Rycote invented the suspension that used a metal ring with moveable pegs and O-rings, etc... All these have been copied. But they patented the "Lyre" suspension, so this has not been copied. The difference between inventing and copying is that the person who invents the product fully understands the science behind it an *how* and *why* it works. The Rycote Windjammer is a special design of fabric, the hairs are the type, diameter and length they are for a reason and how they attach to the backing is that way for a reason. Someone who copies (especially if they want to make it cheaper) is unlikely to fully understand the science and the reason for something - so it ends up looking similar but performing worse (even though it may seem fine on initial testing). EG: many of the copies are worse in high frequency attenuation and frequency response through the cover. Yes, there *are* some quite reasonable windscreens out there, but very very few that are original designs and are not copies of the Rycote. |
Re: Which fuzzy wind screen is better Rode or Rycote?
Fair comments John, although you have omitted the high cost of the Rycote covers and accessories. I suspect there are many followers on this forum who may not be able to justify the extra cost. Of course any professional audio or video guy will not flinch at the cost and no doubt the high quality of Rycote products will speak for themselves.
Now which end do I plug the mike in ? :-). |
Re: Which fuzzy wind screen is better Rode or Rycote?
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Which fuzzy wind screen is better Rode or Rycote?
Quote:
Cheers. |
Re: Which fuzzy wind screen is better Rode or Rycote?
Quote:
But - the Rycote S-series is cheaper than the Røde and has a better suspension - also, the Rycote Miniscreen with Windjammer is cheaper and 5dB better than a Softie. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:08 PM. |
DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2025 The Digital Video Information Network