DV Info Net

DV Info Net (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/)
-   All Things Audio (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/all-things-audio/)
-   -   Having to set gain too high on Mix-Pre sound mixer? (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/all-things-audio/235971-having-set-gain-too-high-mix-pre-sound-mixer.html)

Stuart Graham May 24th, 2009 01:49 AM

Having to set gain too high on Mix-Pre sound mixer?
 
Hi

I have concerns that I'm having to set my mixer's gain too high. When I do a sound level check I have to set the mixer's gain to maximum in order to get the output meter to peak between 0 and 4 dB, even with the mic held very close to the actor's mouth.

I'm using:

Auditechnika At815b shotgun microphone and Canare Star Quad XLR cable with Neutrik connectors. These are attached to my Sound Devices Mix-Pre mixer running on 2 rechargeable NiMH AA batteries.

The mixer is set as follows:
1. PHANTOM = 15V
2. High pass filter 80/160 = OFF (centre position)
3. Limiter = OFF (centre position)
6. TAPE/RTN = RTN

The high pass filter on the microphone is turned off.

Why is the gain so high?
Am I using the wrong type of cable?
Am I using the wrong type of batteries?
Is my mixer faulty?

I've only just bought my mixer and am worried I've bought the wrong one now :(

Thanks in advance for any help

Stuart Graham May 24th, 2009 02:40 AM

I've tried using alkaline Duracell batteries but they didn't increase the audio meter reading for speech, the maximum peak was still about 4dB with gain at maximum.

I also tried using a bog standard XLR cable, which isn't star quad, to connect my mic to the mixer and that didn't make any difference either.

With the Mix-Pre gain set to maximum surely I should get speech peaking above 4dB? Surely the levels should go much higher?

Should I have to set my gain to maximum to get 4dB peak levels on speech?

Dan Keaton May 24th, 2009 06:59 AM

Dear Stuart,

It is highly unlikely that your mixer is defective, or you purchased the wrong one.

My first suggestion would be to try +48V phantom power.

I also suggest that you connect the output of your mixer to your camera and then send the tone signal, then set your camera's levels appropriately. Please remember that the Mixpre outputs a line level signal.

How old is your microphone?

Ty Ford May 24th, 2009 06:59 AM

Hello Stuart,

What mode is your metering in?

It should be peak and RMS, not just RMS.

Regards,

Ty

Stuart Graham May 24th, 2009 12:15 PM

Thanks for the input guys :) I'm flummoxed.

Ty:

There isn't an option for changing metering mode on the Mix-Pre. At least I can't find it in the manual and there isn't a switch on the unit. In the manual it says that the meter is peak responding showing the instantaneous output level in dBu.

Dan:

I've set my XH A1 camcorder up using the 1kHz 0dBu tone signal and it got the correct response in camera of -20dBu, I've checked in a number of threads and this is the correct response. Since the camcorder is reading the correct level with the tone signal does this mean the mixer must be okay? Or does the tone bypass certain components of the mixer?

My main concern is the low levels on the mixer rather than the camcorder. I tried +48V phantom power to the At815b microphone, but it didn't help. The mic is specified as requiring phantom power of 9-52V DC (2 mA typical) so it should be fine on 15V. My microphone is about 3 years old and has had the odd minor knock on set during production of 2 films, do you think it might be damaged? Do microphones age badly?

The full At815b mic spec can be found here:

http://www.audio-technica.com/cms/wi...6b/index.html/

Dan Keaton May 24th, 2009 12:56 PM

Dear Stuart,

The AT815b is a fixed-charge back plate, permanently polarized condenser.

I asked about the age of the microphone since I heard that it is possible, but highly unlikely, that this type of microphone can lose its permanent charge.

Since your microphone is relatively new, this should not be a problem.

Some microphones do better with +48V phantom power, as opposed to +12V or +15V phantom power. However, it does not seem to make any difference with your microphone.


It seems that your MixPre is working fine, based on the levels that you are seeing in your camera when you are sending tone. The tone function substitutes for the input signal from your microphone. Typically, the tone signal does not test the input stages of your MixPre.

But, there is little reason to suspect that your MixPre is not working properly.

I suggest that you set your camera gain levels using the tone function, then record, using your camera. Then bring it into your Non-Linear Editor, or play it back via your camera.

Record someone else's voice while monitoring on the headphones. Does it sound normal when you are monitoring the audio?

On Tuesday, call Sound Devices, they are very helpful.

Bill Ravens May 24th, 2009 12:58 PM

Here's a long shot, but, check the wiring on your XLR cable. I've encountered mis-wired XLR cables...and it was a Canare.

Jack Walker May 24th, 2009 01:51 PM

Can you try another microphone and see what happens?

Do you have the mic that came with the Canon XH-A1. You can plug this directly into the mixer using the short attached cable, eliminating any possible cable problems.

Also, have you plugged the mic (using the same cable you are using to the mixer) directly into the camera? Does it give you high levels (AT mics are typically hot) or is the level low into the camera as well.

Into the camera, compare the XH-A1 mic and the 815.

If the mic and cable are okay, definitely call Sound Devices. They are very nice and will help you make sure your MixPre is setup properly and/or there is defect.

Ty Ford May 24th, 2009 03:10 PM

How far away from the source is the mic?

What's the source?

and have you tried different cables?

Regards,

Ty Ford

Paul R Johnson May 24th, 2009 03:29 PM

The 815 I have here is not an over sensitive mic, compared to some condenser mics it is a little 'deaf'. If you compare the specs with something like a Sennheiser 416, then the sensitivity is less. So it could just be that the mixer doesn't have huge amounts of spare gain, and your mic isn't that well matched - if it produces ok results that are pretty noise free all's well, but it won't do much working at a distance.

Stuart Graham May 27th, 2009 04:48 PM

Hey Guys thanks for the input again :)

I did lots of tests as you asked, it took me a while to get around to it what with one thing and another:

1. With the At815b mic plugged directly into camera (no mixer) using XH A1's +48V phantom:
- speaking "test 1, 2", at about 8 inches from the mic, gave much higher levels than through the mixer, high enough to make it easy to increase gain enough to clip the audio.
- this indicates to me that the microphone is functioning correctly.

2. When going through the Mix-Pre mixer connected to the camcorder you must increase the mixer's gain to maximum and minimise the attenuation on the XH A1 in order to get speech levels to peak at about -12dB on the XH A1 (with the mic held at the same range as in 1.).
- Considering that on set the talent could be considerably further from the mic, to keep it out of frame, is this high enough for recording good audio?

3. Plugging headphones into the camcorder when not using the mixer gave a great deal of hiss which is not apparent after recording to tape and playing back in a NLE. However, listening to a recording through headphones connected to the camera when the mixer's preamps are used gives very little hiss. Presumably the camera preamps interfere with the camera headphone circuitry.

4. Alternating between Canare/Neutrik and generic XLR cables made no difference to the audio response registering on the mixer or in the camera.

5. Alternating between the mixer's +15V and +48V phantom power made no difference to the audio levels. Though perhaps speech had a little more presence at +48V - this is very subjective and I might have imagined it!

6. Using the microphone and mixer connected to the camera with the line/mic switch on the camera set to mic gave huge noise levels and terrible sound. This generates unusable audio even after lowering the gain.
- in short, using the camera's mic setting to boost the input from the Mix-Pre mixer is a no-no.

I haven't got another mic to try at the moment, but I do have one on order (An Oktava MK-012) so I'll test its response on the mixer when it comes.

I've recorded audio directly into the camcorder and into the camcorder via the mixer, perhaps I could try to post the files on here for you guys to listen to and see what you think. I'm not sure if you can post audio or not...

The mic seems fine. So I think that either the mic is not very compatible with the Mix-Pre (because the levels won't go very high on the mixer) or my mixer is defective. What do you guys think?

Thanks again chaps!

Ty Ford May 27th, 2009 05:03 PM

Hmmm,

I suspect it's broken, not incompatible. Go back to where you bought it and let them know.

Good detective work.

Ty Ford

Jay Massengill May 28th, 2009 08:53 AM

Look at your Mix-Pre's external power jack. If the jack is a simple co-axial DC connector, then you have an original model Mix-Pre and the outputs are impedence-balanced but the entire signal is carried on pin 2 of the XLR. This can give odd results with some line-level camera inputs. Regular attenuators also don't work correctly with this older model, so you couldn't use regular attenuators to test again using the camera's mic-level input.
If your Mix-Pre has a 4-pin external DC jack, then it's a new model with conventional balanced outputs. In that case, then perhaps the camera's line-level inputs are extremely insensitive. You could however use regular attenuators on the output of the Mix-Pre and test the camera at mic-level or mic-attenuated level.
Do you have another line-level output source you can connect to the camera and test that to get an idea of how sensitive the camera is at line-level?
The AT815b is not tremendously sensitive like some models, the AT4073a for example. Since the Mix-Pre doesn't have a Master output control, I have to use a lot of input gain when hooked to less sensitive mics. However the Mix-Pre should be putting out enough signal unless the camera's line-level input needs a lot more signal than normal.

Jack Walker May 28th, 2009 09:18 AM

It would not hurt to call the very nice tech people at Sound Devices and ask what the optimal settings are for your setup. Getting this pinned down would make it easier to objectively judge the other elements in your system.

Chris Swanberg May 28th, 2009 11:24 AM

I can tell you that I have used the AT815 with the MixPre (feeding an HVX-200) and did not experience the problems you are describing. SO it is NOT the combination of the 815 and the MixPre standing alone.

Chris

Stuart Graham May 28th, 2009 11:35 AM

Chris and Ty:

I rang the suppliers and have arranged to send it back to them. They said they will check if it is working and speak with Sound Devices for me.

I think it must be defective judging from my tests and by your experiences Chris. Thanks for letting me know it works fine with your At815b mic.

Jay:

I tried using the mic setting on the camcorder, as opposed to line in, and it gave terrible results, very noisy audio and it was very difficult to adjust the levels on the mixer without giving huge variations on the camera. I don't think it's an option.

Jay Massengill May 28th, 2009 01:26 PM

As I stated in my post, you'd have to use an attenuator between the mixer and the camera in order to set the camera input to mic-level successfully.

The reason I mentioned all that about the mixer's external DC input connector type, is to judge which balanced output type your particular mixer has and therefore what attenuator type you could use successfully. It could also give us another clue as to why your setup is giving relatively low input into the camera.
What external power jack does your Mix-Pre have?

Stuart Graham May 28th, 2009 06:54 PM

Hi Jay

It's the 4 pin power jack type, so it's the new model. Unfortunately I don't have another line level input source to test the camera with. The low in camera response with the XH A1 is normal though, I've seen that mentioned in other threads. My main concern is the low levels I'm getting on the mixer really.

Good idea about getting an attenuator and using the mic in on the camcorder to boost the signal. Are attenuator's expensive?

Jay Massengill May 29th, 2009 09:23 AM

Attenuators aren't very expensive, although they aren't exactly cheap either. Definitely good to have on hand though and a necessary expense I feel to handle different situations that may come up.
Switchable models are handy but you can also get single level units.
That's good news about your model of mixer as far as attenuators are concerned. You can use regular, readily available ones instead of custom ones.
I often have to open up the control on my Mix-Pre a lot with quiet sources, but I don't have an AT815b to check. I do have an AT897, which has slightly less sensitivity, and it sometimes requires turning the Mix-Pre control to 3 o'clock to get a good level. I've never noticed it as a problem that I couldn't get enough gain though.

Stuart Graham May 29th, 2009 10:24 AM

Jay:

Thanks for the info Jay. What levels do you get on your Mix-Pre at maximum gain with speech spoken at moderate volume about 8-10" from your AT897? I only get about +4dBu with my 815.

Chris:

Do you happen to remember what sort of peak meter levels you got on your Mix-Pre for speech with the 815 attached?

--

I called Sound Devices today and they said they thought the mixer was fine and that speech peaking at +4dBu units is okay. Unfortunately they haven't tried an At815b with the mixer before so couldn't comment on its compatibility. I'm not sure whether +4dBu is enough as I will have the mic further than 8" away from talent during filming, probably at least double that giving -2dBu. Is -2dBu too low? Anyone have any handle on what types of levels I should expect or aim for on Mix-Pre LED meter readout when capturing speech?

The people at the company that supplied my mic also think +4dBu is fine. I'm going to listen to my test audio again and see if I can determine if the sound quality seems acceptable.

Brooks Harrington May 29th, 2009 11:35 AM

You wouldn't by chance have your limiter turned on..... and have it adjusted way down to about +6... which is the lowest it will go?

Stuart Graham May 29th, 2009 01:27 PM

Hi Brooks

No, the guy at Sound Devices asked me that. Unfortunately the limiter is definitely off.

Good idea though.

Stuart Graham May 31st, 2009 03:36 AM

Tests on XH A1 Versus Mix-Pre/XH A1 Combo
 
1 Attachment(s)
Jay:

Thanks for the info Jay. What levels do you get on your Mix-Pre at maximum gain with speech spoken at moderate volume about 8" from your AT897?

I only get about +4dBu with my 815.

Chris:

Do you happen to remember what sort of peak meter levels you got on your Mix-Pre for speech with the 815 attached?

Anyone have an idea what levels I should expect or aim for on a Mix-Pre LED meter readout when capturing speech?


Audio Tests

I have compiled an audio file containing tests with the At815b mic plugged into the Mix-Pre and/or the XH A1.

Bit rate: 768kbps
Sample size: 16 bit
Channels: mono
Audio sample rate: 48kHz
Distance from microphone tip to subject: 7.5"
When the Mix-Pre mixer was used gain setting was at maximum
Roughly the same in camera peak meter levels were used in all tests (peaking at around -12dB on the XH A1 meter)
Slight differences in peak levels were corrected in Media Composer (peaking at -14dB)

If you listen to the file you will hear the tests in the following order:

1. no audio
2. At815b through Mix-Pre into XH A1, 6 x "Test, 1, 2..."
3. At815b direct into XH A1, 6 x "Test, 1, 2..."
4. no audio
5. At815b through Mix-Pre into XH A1, "Mary had a little lamb..."
6. At815b direct into XH A1, "Mary had a little lamb..."
7. no audio

Anyone have a comment on the quality of the audio in the various tests?

Here is the audio file:

Stuart Graham May 31st, 2009 08:00 AM

Repeat of tests at 20 inch range
 
1 Attachment(s)
I've done even more tests! The tests are the same as the last set but this time the distance from microphone tip to subject was a more realistic 20 inches. When the Mix-Pre mixer was used the gain setting was at maximum as before.

Roughly the same in camera peak meter levels were used in all the tests (peaking a little higher than -20dB on the XH A1 meter and giving a corresponding 0dB on the Mix-Pre meter).

Slight differences in peak levels were again corrected in Media Composer (peaking at -14dB)

If you listen to the file you will hear the tests in the following order:

1. no audio
2. At815b through Mix-Pre into XH A1, 6 x "Test, 1, 2..."
3. At815b direct into XH A1, 6 x "Test, 1, 2..."
4. no audio
5. At815b through Mix-Pre into XH A1, "Mary had a little lamb..."
6. At815b direct into XH A1, "Mary had a little lamb..."
7. no audio
8. At815b through Mix-Pre into XH A1, "The rain in Spain..."
9. At815b direct into XH A1, "The rain in Spain..."
10. no audio

Stuart Graham May 31st, 2009 08:19 AM

Comparison of XH A1 at high gain versus XH A1 at low gain and versus Mix-Pre mixer
 
1 Attachment(s)
I've done some final tests using high gain on the XH A1 to see if it gives better quality audio than using either the Mix-Pre or more conservative XH A1 gain settings. Again the distance from microphone tip to subject was 20 inches.

When the Mix-Pre mixer was used its gain setting was at maximum as before.
When the mic was connected directly to the XH A1 with 'normal' gain this corresponded to 6 notches on the gain wheel as opposed to its maximum setting of 9 notches that was used in tests 3, 7 and 11. The max gain setting gave audio peaking at about -6dB on the XH A1 readout.

If you listen to the file you will hear the tests in the following order:

1. no audio
2. At815b through Mix-Pre into XH A1 at 'normal' gain, 2 x "Test, 1, 2..."
3. At815b direct into XH A1 at maximum gain (but no clipping), 2 x "Test, 1, 2..."
4. At815b direct into XH A1, 1 x "Test, 1, 2..."
5. no audio
6. At815b through Mix-Pre into XH A1 at 'normal' gain, "Mary had a little lamb..."
7. At815b direct into XH A1 at maximum gain (but no clipping), "Mary had a little lamb..."
8. At815b direct into XH A1, "Mary had a little lamb..."
9. no audio
10. At815b through Mix-Pre into XH A1 at 'normal' gain, "The rain in Spain..."
11. At815b direct into XH A1 at maximum gain (but no clipping), "The rain in Spain..."
12. At815b direct into XH A1, "The rain in Spain..."
13. no audio


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:53 PM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network