![]() |
Hi-Md mic plug?
Picked up a Sony H-MD MZ NH700 mini disc for back up sound.I just noticed that on the microphone input plug it reads Mic(plug in power).I intend using the recorder with an Electro Voice RE50/B omni derectional dynamic,non powered mic.Question for all you guys who use the mini disc recorders.
Is there any kind of issue if I plug the above type of mic in the Mic(plug in power)socket? The last thing I want is to electricaly fry my RE50 or my AT897 shotgun. |
MD's are just like camcorders in how much power they supply to a mic. Both supply what is referred to as plug in power. It is a very low voltage power designed to power mics just like yours.
There shouldn't be any problem using either of your mics with a MD. HIMD is the same also BTW. The plug in power from the MD runs at max 2.5 v which isn't much. It's made to work with mics like that AT897 and your Electrovoice. I know people are using AT897 mics with their MD's. Plug in power isn't likely to ever hurt anything really. It just isn't strong enough to hurt anything. That's why mics like the AT897 have their own power supply. Plug in power isn't very strong. Your Electrovoice mic is no doubt meant to be powered by plug in power. All mics need some power to operate. Some mics are designed to work with plug in power. Yours is no doubt one of them. In fact many people add battery boxes to increase the power to a mic like that because plug in power is so low. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
There are mics designed to work with plug-in power. And it is true that people add battery boxes to increase their power for better results. But the RE50 and AT897 aren't in that category of mics. I would suggest getting an adapter that allows you to maintain a balanced connection to your mics, with minimal unbalanced cable length into the recorder. As well as having a capacitor to eliminate any noise that can come from the plug-in power. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
ME66 powered by K6, to XLR adapter, XLR adapter to HiMD. Seems to work for me, but if I can improve, what would I need to do ? |
Quote:
Take the following with a grain of salt. The problem is there are three possibilities for how the manufacturer's external mic might be connected to your HiMD and I havern't used one so I don't know which applies to yours ... Mono mic, TRS plug, signal on tip, power on the ring, ground on sleeve Mono mic, TS plug, signal plus power on the tip, ground on sleeve Stereo mic, TRS plug, left on tip, right on ring, power on both, ground on sleeve. Assuming the external mic is mono and it's split to both stereo channels inside the recorder. If your adapter is just a cable with an XLR on one end and a miniplug on the other, it would only take a second to check to see if it's wired correctly and has the blocking capactor in it. Get a multimeter (if you don't have one you can get one at Radio Shack for about $20) and see if it shows connected or open between pin 2 on the XLR connector and the tip of the miniplug. If it reads open, then there's a capacitor in there to block DC. If it shows a short, then there isn't. If the miniplug is a TRS, the ring and sleeve should be shorted together and whether its TRS or TS, pin 1 of the XLR should connect to the sleeve. XLR pin 3 is unconnected. If the HiMD is designed for a stereo external mic and you're using a simple XLR to miniplug cable, it changes a little. A consumer stereo mic's wiring has the left channel on the tip, the right channel on the ring, and a common ground in the sleeve with the plug-in power voltage applied on both the tip and the ring. In that case, the XLR pin 1 should be connected to the sleeve of the miniplug. XLR pin 2 should connect to the tip of the miniplug through the blocking capacitor and the miniplug's tip and ring jumpered together inside the connector. Again, XLR pin 3 is unconnected. In some cases you might need to jumper XLR pins 1 & 3 together, especially with dynamic mics, but I doubt you'll need to - try without them connected first and if you don't get any signal or it seems noisy, try with them connected and see which way works better. |
Steve's right. Plug-in power will cause catastrophic problems with audio recorded with a balanced signal. Many (most?) XLR adapters have voltage blocking capacitors though, so it's not that big of a deal for most people. I've used an ME66 with minidisc many times using XLR adapters made by Shure and Studio 1 though.
|
Yeah, Steve, I didn't make that clear. I was actually talking about the Beachtek DXA-4 I normally would mount on my camera..
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Excuse me for not thinking someone would be asking about plugging a balanced mic into a minidisk. They don't have balanced connecters last time I checked. I would have expected some mention to be made of that fact since he did speak of connecting it to the MD he bought. Sure you can get an adapter. I have one so I know they make them. But it's "incredibly obvious day" so I thought I should mention it. Pretty much any mic made to plug into a MD player should operate with that player with no problems. Only mics that require an adapter might have problems. Excuse me that I didn't know he was going to be using an adapter. |
Quote:
The EV mic he was referring to is a dynamic mic. Dynamic mics do not requre ANY power source to function, be it plug-in, phantom, internal battery, or external battery box. Why? Because they are a micro-generator in their own right, converting sound vibration into electrical energy by moving a coil in a magnetic field. The AT897 is a condensor mic and it does require power, but it is NOT made to work with plug-in power or an external battery box. The 897 works either on its internal battery or on phantom power, but phantom and plug-in power are two entirely different things in terms of both voltage levels and connection method, and one cannot be substituted for the other. The 897 WILL NOT work with plug-in nor with an external battery box (unless the box happens to be an external, battery-driven, phantom power supply), the best you can say is it might not be affected by plug-in when used with a pience of equipment that provides it. Nor will it's signal be "boosted" by such an external battery box unless the box happens to be a mic preamp such as a Beach DXA-8 or -10 or a SD MM-1. |
Quote:
I'm guessing there are mics that don't have these capacitors but like you say many devices that adapt XLR to unbalanced have the capacitors built in. I believe the Beachtec models have them. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I guess where I got off track was thinking someone who said they were plugging a mic into a MD must be using mics with unbalanced cables. No mention was made of needing an adapter of any kind so I got it in my head that he was talking about the 892 which has it's own adapter so that essentially it works on either a balanced or an unbalanced line. At any rate no mention of the fact that his mics were both XLR made me think he was using mics that were unbalanced. Obviously I was wrong but the rush to point it out with such declaratory zeal seems out of place and unneccessary. I found no such delight in pointing out your error even though my mistake was more understandable IMO. You were uninformed in the matter of powered dynamics while I just made a mistake of assuming a person speaking of plugging a mic into a MD could actually do that without using an adapter which wasn't mentioned. |
Quote:
Only corrected you because I didn't want anyone reading this thread to get the idea that the mic plug-in power supplied by consumer gear such as computer soundcards, HiMD and iRiver/iPod type recorders, consumer camcorders, etc was at all related to the phantom power or internal battery power required by virtually all "serious" condensor mics. It's not even close to being the same thing - instead it's intended to power the external accessory mics the recorder manufacturers sell or the sort of cheap "accessory" electret mics you find in the blister-paks next to the register in big-box computer stores, in computer "multimedia" headsets, or at Radio Snak. Before anyone objects to my characterization of plug-in being intended to power "cheap consumer electrets," I know the Giant Squid mics are built to use it and they give acceptable results in professional use by wedding videographers etc. but one has to admit that a $30 Squid mic isn't really in the same class as a $300 Tram or Countryman. I should add too that it is not a matter of balanced or unbalanced connections that makes the difference. While most better mics these days are balanced, true enough, it's not writ in granite that they must be and there are plenty of unbalanced mics out there. Plugin power isn't meant for most of them either. |
There are certainly many "serious" mics that are made to adapt to unbalanced use. The AT892, which I mistakenly thought of in this thread, is a good example. It's a very good mic that comes with it's own adapter to the unbalanced world. Then there's the Rode VideoMic and the Stereo VideoMic. Both are hardly anything less than excellent quality.
My own Nady CM-2S records excellent quality and it comes packed with 2 XLR to unblanced cables and no straight XLR cables at all. My GS doesn't come with any XLR cable or any connection of that type at all. I'll admit that these mics are not the top of the line but to label them as not "serious" strikes me as condescending. The only thing that makes XLR any better is the shielding. To say that HIMD recorders are less than serious is to miss the boat if you ask me. You sound like the producer of many Beatles albums, Geore Martin, who disapproves of excessively convenient recording technology (read cheap) because it takes the ability out of the hands of the few and gives it to the many. You might find the quality of lesser known equipment to be startling if you give it a try. There's a lot of snobbery in the world of audio it seems. I don't know you well enough to say whether you fall into that category but many do. Martin said we could all be producing albums in our bathtubs that equal the quality of those Beatles albums. I hate to tell George but we can exceed that limited early 1960's quality quite easily and do it in the bathtub (where no AC power is allowed of course). HIMD is very good quality and so are many of the unbalanced mics you lump together and deride. The few who can actually hear the difference between a HIMD recording using a GS compared to the best quality money can buy can spend their money on something better if they choose. The other 99% of the population will do just fine without the extra cost thank you. Maybe the mic preamps aren't the best in the world. And maybe the unbalanced lines require extra short cable runs. But the noise level is actually very low compared to much of the stuff on the radio because of the fact that levels on those radio songs are pushed to the max and headroom is nil (and maxed out levels mean more noise of course). HIMD is a music format for the most part and it compares favorably to much of the trash being sold by the truckload at Wally World. Have you heard the stuff they sell there? Don't tell me you can't produce that level of quality on HIMD. Low cost, high quality pre-amps are also commonly sold for these devices so you can get around the one true limitation they have. XLR adapters are certainly not uncommon either. Our friend here must be using them. The fact is (IMO of course) that cheap equipment can produce very high quality these days. It may not be on the level of the high priced stuff but it's on the level of the high priced stuff of just a few years ago. Quality is relative and the progression of increased quality has a much more shallow angle on a flow chart than the price progression to obtain that quality. How good is good enough? You might find that many here are gear heads and as such they are not at all concerned with the bottom line and the question of how good does it need to be to be acceptable. Some of us make money with equipment on the low end of the scale and get surprising results in the process. |
Quote:
Whoa! I never said there was any problem with using the proper adapters to connect balanced mics to unbalanced inputs or that only low quality cheap'os were used that way. Nor have I said that mics that are either unbalanced to start with or come with adapters aren't any good. Far from it - I said there are many excellent mics out there that are unbalanced from the get-go. What I have also said is that what is labeled "mic plug-in power" on consumer recording gear is intended to supply power to the $10 blister-pack mics designed to sit next to your computer monitor or the $25-$50 consumer "accessory kit" mics - you know, the hand-held mic, genuine leatherette carrying case, and spare battery sort of thing - sold to be used with iRivers, iPods, audio cassette recorders, consumer camcorders and the like and it will not supply the needs of higher level mics. The Rode Videomic is a solid prosumer performer but it does NOT run on plug-in power. Same with the Audio Technica - and by the way, it's the AT822 stereo mic under discussion, NOT the AT892 micro headset earpiece and mic combo. The AT822, and your Nady for that matter, are good examples of unbalanced mics that happen to have XLR connectors - their XLRs are actually a way to have two unbalanced 2 conductor channels in the same connector with more strength than you get with the typical 1/8 inch TRS stereo miniplug. These are certainly mics accceptable for hobbyist and low budget professional use, but the mic that came in the box with your Soundblaster card isn't. Don't try to record music, mic the talent in your low-budget indy feature or the groom in a wedding with a Soundblaster accessory mic and that's the sort of mic that plug-in power is intended for. As for GS mics being acceptable for serious use, there I'm not sure. If the results you hear on most wedding videos are an indication of what you'll obtain with a GS plugged into an iRiver, I remain skeptical. The vows might be understandable, but they certainly don't have the presence, clarity, and general realism of a character's dialog on "CSI" and it's that kind of rendition that sets the bar to aim for. |
That's what I thought of the GS when I heard the results from it but other people seem to think it's a great mic. I wondered if it was my hearing going bad for a while. I'm really not sure why people seem to give it so much creedence but they do. I see it mentioned in lists of "what to buy" all the time. For example over at another board concerned with taping concerts half the people there use GS's. Sure they're small (stealth is big for those guys) but I don't think they sound all that great.
I guess I made the same mistake again and mentioned the wrong AT mic. It is the 822 that I was talking about. |
Thanks
A huge thanks to everyone for their help and feedback regarding my original post about MD recorders. My question about microphones and using the (powered) plug in socket for EV RE50 and AT897 has had an incredable amount of response. This Dv info site ceases to amaze; it’s a true font of knowledge.
|
I also have question regarding the plug-in power on cameras. Is it ok to connect the tip and ring together to get dual mono (left and right channel from 1 mono mic) or theres a big possbility to shorts the circuit of the camera when the tip and ring solder together?
|
Quote:
|
but if you use a mono 1/8" TS it automatical shorts the Ring and sleeve right? hmm confusing.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:59 AM. |
DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2025 The Digital Video Information Network