Schoeps low-cut filter???
Hi all. . .
I'm about to purchase a third Schoeps CMC6 with an MK41 capsule for boom use, but want to know if you recommend the Schoeps low-cut filter, as well. I'll be running the mic into a very nice Yamaha digital mixer/recorder (where I could also engage EQ) and then into the camera, but want to know if it would be better to purchase the Schoeps filter. Thanks much! Stephen |
I haven't owned a Schoeps for a few years but I remember the Low Cut being very effective. What happens when you use the mic with some other mixer? You should try it before you buy it if possible.
|
I know people who swear by it. I know those who have tried it and don't care.
I have yet to venture there. I use the high-pass filter on my 442 mixer. Some say that's fine, others still think the cut is better. It's more stuff to hang on the end of the boom. Regards, Ty |
Quote:
|
We've just been using the low-cut filter on the MM-1 or the SD302 and it seems to work just fine.
|
The argument for using the Schoeps low-cut is that it removes the low frequency signal before any sort of electronic amplification. Removing it before the preamp gives you a cleaner signal to work with down the line.
In addition, the Scheops filter is pretty steep (18dB/octave?), and some folks find that helpful. Some mixers (I know this is true for the SD442) have their high-pass filters ahead of the pre-amps, so that covers one of the bases. The Scheops filter is fixed at 60Hz. They do have a 120Hz version too, but it has a noticable impact on voices. |
I do kind of want one, but I'm a little skeptical that the improvement over the mixer's onboard low-cut filter is going to be that noticeable, if at all, let alone to people with untrained ears.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:39 PM. |
DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network