Mark Goldberg
January 6th, 2008, 05:10 PM
I recently upgraded to Vegas Pro 8, and subsequently the 8A update.
I have noticed a few things that are actually inferior to Vegas 7e that I was using. I mainly shoot and edit HDV.
I had no problems with 7 through 7E.
Vegas Pro 8 takes a LOT LONGER to render. For example, with an HDV edit, I could render to MPEG2 for SD DVDs at a rate of about .7x timeline length. For example a 100-minute show would render in 70 minutes. I also render to WMV-HD, so it would take about 8x timeline length for 720p and 13x timeline length for 1080p.
On my last job, a 90-minute wedding, it took about 4.5 hours to render mpeg2 files for SD dvd. The program crashed trying to render to WMVHD, so I had to render to m2t first, then bring that into Vegas 7 to render to WMVHD.
It always crashes when trying to render to an AVI intermediate.
I have been able to render WMVHD in Vegas Pro 8 with short shows, like 3-7 minutes.
I have noticed a few things that are actually inferior to Vegas 7e that I was using. I mainly shoot and edit HDV.
I had no problems with 7 through 7E.
Vegas Pro 8 takes a LOT LONGER to render. For example, with an HDV edit, I could render to MPEG2 for SD DVDs at a rate of about .7x timeline length. For example a 100-minute show would render in 70 minutes. I also render to WMV-HD, so it would take about 8x timeline length for 720p and 13x timeline length for 1080p.
On my last job, a 90-minute wedding, it took about 4.5 hours to render mpeg2 files for SD dvd. The program crashed trying to render to WMVHD, so I had to render to m2t first, then bring that into Vegas 7 to render to WMVHD.
It always crashes when trying to render to an AVI intermediate.
I have been able to render WMVHD in Vegas Pro 8 with short shows, like 3-7 minutes.