View Full Version : What do you do with your ProHD camera?


Adam Grunseth
March 9th, 2008, 09:35 PM
I'm just curious what everyone here uses their ProHD cameras for?

I just started work on a documentary project, but before that I used it for mainly for wedding videos and the occasional coorporate vid.

Ian Planchon
March 9th, 2008, 10:21 PM
I freelance for news companies with mine. it was fun to watch the tides turn from betacam style to mini dv, at first everyone laughed at my gear because it was smaller than theirs....now they are all buying the same stuff. its lighter, and on breaking news events, a lot easier to run around with. Of course, the big three still equip their crews with beta and DVCAM, but I bet that changes in the next few years too.

Stuart Campbell
March 10th, 2008, 02:52 AM
The gy-hd200e is used almost exclusively for corporate work. All our broadcast work is still shot on Digi Beta or DVCPro. European broadcast units still don't like accepting anything on HDV or mini DV. The image quality from the pro HD cameras just can't crack it when you are shooting for network transmission. However, I really like the camera and for high end corporate it's superb!

Claude Mangold
March 10th, 2008, 05:34 AM
I use mine for film work exclusively, with with mini-35 but also testing other configs and also from time to time with the standard lens. I am lucky to work with a DP who appreciates this camera.

What I love about it is the nature of the image and the quality of the full-progressive shooting.

And I also use this camera for scouting, test shoots etc when preparing a film.

I work both in docu and fiction.

James Thirston
March 10th, 2008, 05:49 AM
Only just got my first ProHD 200U which I plan to use in conjunction with my existing fleet of hand-held cameras. I shoot weddings professionally and have been lusting after a proper shoulder mount to get those steadier interview/formal shots at weddings and also needed a cam that looks more "pro" at events where half the wedding guests are running around with big-arsed DSLRs and handycams.

JT

Mark Silva
March 10th, 2008, 10:32 AM
I use an hd100 primarily as the aquisition device of an Aerial Telecine for 8mm, Super8 and 16mm film transfer. It does a great job in SD and HD.

The other use is corporate videos or low budget tv spots.

Alan Ortiz
March 10th, 2008, 11:07 AM
EVERYTHING!

seriously, its just such a great piece of equipment. despite the fact that i dont use it primarily for work and more as the perfect indie film and short film cam, it has paid for itself several times already. its a hard cam to let go of once you appreciate everything it has to offer, and the image is very pleasing.

Ben Winter
March 10th, 2008, 11:56 AM
Holds my beer real nice.

Carlos Rodriguez
March 10th, 2008, 12:35 PM
television programming. we have a leased access setup which we are buying out the channel we broadcast on, so right now we do news 4 times a day, and an infomercial. we also have a travel show, and are in the works for a show to promote local musicians, and more to come.

Brian Luce
March 10th, 2008, 01:01 PM
What's the vote?

Is the JVC 100/200 a legimate broadcast camera? SD and HD?

I know that technically any and every camera is a "broadcast" camera since we see footage on TV broadcast with cell phone cams. However, staying true to the spirit of the term, nebulous as it is, what are the opinions out here?

Gavin Owens
March 10th, 2008, 01:34 PM
I got my 201e only recently and have just shot corporates on it so far but I plan to shoot a few pilots soon. If commissioned then I will continue shooting on the JVC. I have been a cameraman for over 10 years and have used nearly every type of camera available and I have to say, every camera has it's own traits and look. The JVC has a very desirable warmth and sharpness when used HD mode. I have seen lots of awful images shot on expensive broadcast cameras. Used well the JVC competes perfectly.
Gavin

Ian Planchon
March 10th, 2008, 06:21 PM
What's the vote?

Is the JVC 100/200 a legimate broadcast camera? SD and HD?

I know that technically any and every camera is a "broadcast" camera since we see footage on TV broadcast with cell phone cams. However, staying true to the spirit of the term, nebulous as it is, what are the opinions out here?



yes. yes. yes.

thats all I use it for, and not just for local, or public access. I shoot mainly for network news companies. they are all happy with the video, and everyone airs it. so my answer is most definately YES.

I should follow that up with, for news, I shoot in SD. HD is still a stickler for most. the 720p thing scares a lot of people. but ESPN and most other sports shows actually prefer 720p, so I will be using the HD100 for some nascar and indy shoots this summer.

Adam Grunseth
March 10th, 2008, 11:08 PM
What's the vote?

Is the JVC 100/200 a legimate broadcast camera? SD and HD?

I know that technically any and every camera is a "broadcast" camera since we see footage on TV broadcast with cell phone cams. However, staying true to the spirit of the term, nebulous as it is, what are the opinions out here?

I know of several local news stations across the country that use Pro HD cameras for all their field work. About a year ago a freelance crew visited us from L.A. doing a feature story for CBS news and they were using Pro HD gear.

Mark Silva
March 11th, 2008, 11:10 AM
agreed.

In a world where the likes of CNN uses 320x240 15fps "video phone" video during broadcast, its absurd to think the JVC is not broadcast worthy.

Glen Vandermolen
March 11th, 2008, 04:25 PM
I've shot several local commercials, music videos (nationally broadcast) and a friend I let use it is shooting a documentary.
So, it gets used a lot.

Dennis Robinson
March 11th, 2008, 05:42 PM
I shoot and edit 200 television commercials a year with my JVC 111. I also shoot and edit corporate videos. I always shoot in HDV and convert to SD.

Liam Hall
March 11th, 2008, 06:15 PM
Low-end corporate, but high-end ambition...

John Mitchell
March 12th, 2008, 01:26 AM
The term broadcast quality is so nebulous and the goalposts shift from time to time. For example a lot of "broadcast quality" video shot about a decade ago on Sony SP cameras actually looks quite noisy compared to even SD off the ProHD - especially after finally getting to air through multiple analogue generations.

I would say the ProHD cameras are definitely capable of producing broadcast quality video in the hands of an experienced operator with enough light.

We use ours for a three day a week corporate TV show and in HD for small budget TVCs.

Jeffrey Butler
March 12th, 2008, 02:42 AM
I bought mine thinking I could become something. Then - I found this video, and I realized - I just can't compete....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AC0sR5_NTFo

What's a guy to do?

James Thirston
March 12th, 2008, 06:34 AM
I bought mine thinking I could become something. Then - I found this video, and I realized - I just can't compete....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AC0sR5_NTFo

What's a guy to do?

I hear you Jeffrey... watching that and some of their other captivating films made me want to take all my cameras and throw them off the nearest cliff.

It's actually scary to think that the whole Fred & Sharon movie production company thing is genuine.


I love it!!

JT

Diogo Athouguia
March 12th, 2008, 08:18 AM
Lllloooolllllll

Brian Luce
March 12th, 2008, 08:46 AM
I bought mine thinking I could become something. Then - I found this video, and I realized - I just can't compete....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AC0sR5_NTFo

What's a guy to do?

That is soooooooo SCTV!!!!!!!

Eric Gulbransen
March 12th, 2008, 09:02 AM
I bought mine thinking I could become something. Then - I found this video, and I realized - I just can't compete....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AC0sR5_NTFo

What's a guy to do?

I've got a nagging feeling they made more money with their gear than I did with mine last year. All my crap's for sale now..

Oscar Honorio Pantoja
March 12th, 2008, 11:25 AM
I have a jvc100. Work in weddings, corporative videos and events.
Look my videos here:
http://www.brightcove.tv/channel_all_uploads.jsp?channel=987381136&firstVideo=0

http://www.youtube.com/imagenpro

Tim Polster
March 12th, 2008, 11:32 AM
Three cheers for Youtube!

Joseph A. Benoit
March 12th, 2008, 11:39 AM
Oscar
love your work
Joe

Oscar Honorio Pantoja
March 12th, 2008, 12:29 PM
THANKS friend, very thanks

Mark Cowherd
March 13th, 2008, 05:02 AM
I have HD 250chu and I shoot 6-10 long form (15 minute) Drive through car commercials a week for the local cable company. You know the type, where the dealer stands in front and talks about each car as it rolls up. The best things about it are 1) Car dealers/salesman are really good guys and 2)the gig is over in 15 minutes.
Mark Cowherd
Louisville, KY

Burk Webb
March 13th, 2008, 01:49 PM
"Fred & Sharon movie production company"

Oh my GOD that was funny!

Chris Davis
March 16th, 2008, 08:10 PM
Software demo and training videos. A real yawner, but they pay well and pay fast!

Steven Houser
March 16th, 2008, 10:15 PM
Commercial work this week..
http://www.box.net/shared/k6ymvjds08

Dennis Robinson
March 16th, 2008, 11:31 PM
Good job Steve,
Did you use a software package to move the frames or do it on the timeline.

Jeffrey Butler
March 17th, 2008, 08:35 PM
I've got a nagging feeling they made more money with their gear than I did with mine last year. All my crap's for sale now..

Well, I know for certain they've gotten more hits on that video than anything I'VE ever posted....

Steven Houser
March 17th, 2008, 08:56 PM
template tha I had to reverse engineer....
Go to http://shop2.professional-video-templates.com/

email him mention my name get a discount.