Darko Debelic
March 27th, 2008, 02:48 AM
I sometime do some shooting for television and they are quite happy with me shooting editing and delivering on a mini DV tape (DVCAM format).
I edit on a Mac Powerbook Pro with FCP 6.02
However, I do have the possibility the shoot in HDV as well, and I was told I would earn in definition even when downconverted to DV.
Is this so?
And if I do go about it what would be best to maintain definition:
1. capturing a downconverted DVCAM directly from the camera?
2. editing in HDV and exporting in DVCAM?
I have tried exporting some HDV material directly to tape from an HDV timeline and the results where pretty terrible.
Things looked a bit better when I imported the HDV material into a PAL anamorphic timeline and exported from there to tape. But it didn't look that good compared to DVCAM material of the same subject.
I found that the best results from HDV come when going directly to DVD, that looked really good.
Is it worth doing all this or should I just stick to SD if my ultimate product is SD?
Thanks.
I edit on a Mac Powerbook Pro with FCP 6.02
However, I do have the possibility the shoot in HDV as well, and I was told I would earn in definition even when downconverted to DV.
Is this so?
And if I do go about it what would be best to maintain definition:
1. capturing a downconverted DVCAM directly from the camera?
2. editing in HDV and exporting in DVCAM?
I have tried exporting some HDV material directly to tape from an HDV timeline and the results where pretty terrible.
Things looked a bit better when I imported the HDV material into a PAL anamorphic timeline and exported from there to tape. But it didn't look that good compared to DVCAM material of the same subject.
I found that the best results from HDV come when going directly to DVD, that looked really good.
Is it worth doing all this or should I just stick to SD if my ultimate product is SD?
Thanks.