Christopher Drews
October 3rd, 2008, 01:26 PM
Go with me on this people - these new flash recording boxes are great - record 10 bit - nice mobile form factor - flash memory falling.
BUT!
What about a proven workflow that 90% of broadcasters use right now for HD and a codec @ 176 mbs for 24p or 220 mbs for 60i?
Yep, I'm talking about Avid DNxHD.
For under 10K you could get an older adrenaline system with a DNxHD board, bring this on the set of your feature, and with say a 300 ft BNC cable (max length HD-SDI), have a decent amount of flexibility while recording 10 bit quality equivalent to HD-CAM.
It's a memory hungry codec, it will require an array, but I'm surprised nobody has thought of this or done this yet? Or have they?
Check Ebay - I'm not kidding.
BTW-
DNxHD blows Pro-Res out of the water.
I'm not trying to pitch Avid (I love FCP) but don't overlook this if mobility isn't king.
Hope this helps,
-C
BUT!
What about a proven workflow that 90% of broadcasters use right now for HD and a codec @ 176 mbs for 24p or 220 mbs for 60i?
Yep, I'm talking about Avid DNxHD.
For under 10K you could get an older adrenaline system with a DNxHD board, bring this on the set of your feature, and with say a 300 ft BNC cable (max length HD-SDI), have a decent amount of flexibility while recording 10 bit quality equivalent to HD-CAM.
It's a memory hungry codec, it will require an array, but I'm surprised nobody has thought of this or done this yet? Or have they?
Check Ebay - I'm not kidding.
BTW-
DNxHD blows Pro-Res out of the water.
I'm not trying to pitch Avid (I love FCP) but don't overlook this if mobility isn't king.
Hope this helps,
-C