<<<-- Originally posted by Glenn Gipson : 30p is no good for the PAL market or Film transfers. If you shoot on 30p, then you are shooting down your potential profits. -->>>

Hi Glen,
I don't follow your comment. We were talking about 24P production, not 30P. While all of the cameras can do 30P, it would have a different aplication, like TV in the US. or a mild slow mo in a 24P timeline. So somewhere I disconnected from your point. Did I miss something?

Best regards,

jan

Jan, since the tittle of the post was 24p vs. 30p, I was simply giving my opinion on 30p. For me, the issue of whether or not to shoot on 24p or 30p boils down to distribution options, and 30p is limited in this regards.

Glenn, your point is correct -- many PAL countries are very unforgiving about NTSC-originated footage. If you may distribute in Europe, there is a strong argument to be made for shooting in PAL or 24p.

Marcus van Bavel at www.DVfilm.com has an interesting piece of software -- Atlantis -- that converts PAL SD to deinterlaced NTSC with 3:2 pulldown. Only place I've heard of this approach for converting PAL.

<<<-- Originally posted by Glenn Gipson : Jan, since the tittle of the post was 24p vs. 30p, I was simply giving my opinion on 30p.
Hi Glenn,

Thanks for the clarification, I was looking at your response as a response to something that I had written. I understand and yes, I agree, 30P is mostly valid as a final master in NTSC countries.

Best regards,

Jan

We associate 24 with drama and 60 with news/reality and low production values (soap operas). This is partly because of what we are used to, but also because the dreamlike 24 speed makes our mind make up more information. I think this is similar to how you can read a book and 'see' a vivid image but watch a soap opera and be shocked back to an all-too-literal reality. I would not pick 60fps for drama but I would pick 30fps for it.

Did you ever wonder why it is easier to make an artistic photo with black and white film? This is not because our mind associates 'art' with black and white -- but rather because we do not interpret it literally! While it is certainly possible to make an artistic photo in color, it is MUCH harder. Likewise, you can make an art film at 60fps, but it would have to have more going for it for people to accept it.

There were some films shot in 30fps (was it Oklahoma?) and people were amazed and called it better. For this reason, I personally would shoot at 30p now unless I wanted to either match film or go out to film. And I would use 60i or 60p for news and sports.

This kinda applies to this discussion...what about this scenario:

I am shooting a commercial with my XL1s this week. The product will be aired on standard tv's throughout the region. I will film on mini-dv, and have it transfered to betacam sp to submit to the station.

It is a commercial for a medical practice, so i dont want it to feel harsh, making me think that frame mode is a better option.

Thoughts?

I am having terrific luck with using VirtualDub and some deinterlace filters. If I were doing it I would shoot it in interlace and then decide later.

Did you check if the station accepts mini-dv? If so, I would submit in both formats, with BetaSP as a backup to cover yourself but mini DV will look better (I mean in the sense it is not a copy).

I am actually submitting it to them on mini-dv, and they are going to transfer to betacam for me (isnt that nice of them). i am assuming their equipment requires betacam sp, and thats why they are transferring.