Fenn Jacob
December 29th, 2003, 12:38 PM
Hello good forum members!
In no way is this post intended to resemble the classic "Just tell me the best camera to get" question. I have spent some good time researching the usual SD cameras (Xl1, PD150, DVX100 etc.) and concluded many times that I had made my decision on each of them. I began at the XL1s and had no need for the interchangeable lenses or its flashy pro look, so I moved on to the PD150. After many hours of research and reviews, I am now at the Pan DVX100 (or 100A---whichever I feel I can get a better deal on :))
Ultimately my question has come to this. The 24p feature of the Panny is no doubt its largest selling point. I, however, am currently limited with Premiere Pro, and don't like the choppy look of 24p unadvanced, so most of my work would not be in 24p. This at first led me to remove the DVX100 from my list- the extra price wasn't worth 24p. However, I looked into the camera, and its other features speak well of it--24p excluded. The Pd150 has 380k CCDs, the XL1s 270k, or something like this I believe? The DVX has 410k? Plus a manual lens, and XLR inputs. These two would save me a lot of money over the Canon. Also, even if I don't often use 24p, a good "true progressive" 30p would be nice. So, I do not ask which to buy, but make a statement that seems legitimite from my studies. The Panasonic AG-DVX100 is a most excellent camera for standard 30p or 60i footage and easily comparable to the Canon or Sony equivalents. I am no camera intellect, and would appreciate the "experts" opinions on the validity of this statement. It just seems to me that we have let the 24p feature of the camera belittle its other great qualities, in good old non filmic 29.97.
Thank you very much for reading, please contribute your thoughts...
In no way is this post intended to resemble the classic "Just tell me the best camera to get" question. I have spent some good time researching the usual SD cameras (Xl1, PD150, DVX100 etc.) and concluded many times that I had made my decision on each of them. I began at the XL1s and had no need for the interchangeable lenses or its flashy pro look, so I moved on to the PD150. After many hours of research and reviews, I am now at the Pan DVX100 (or 100A---whichever I feel I can get a better deal on :))
Ultimately my question has come to this. The 24p feature of the Panny is no doubt its largest selling point. I, however, am currently limited with Premiere Pro, and don't like the choppy look of 24p unadvanced, so most of my work would not be in 24p. This at first led me to remove the DVX100 from my list- the extra price wasn't worth 24p. However, I looked into the camera, and its other features speak well of it--24p excluded. The Pd150 has 380k CCDs, the XL1s 270k, or something like this I believe? The DVX has 410k? Plus a manual lens, and XLR inputs. These two would save me a lot of money over the Canon. Also, even if I don't often use 24p, a good "true progressive" 30p would be nice. So, I do not ask which to buy, but make a statement that seems legitimite from my studies. The Panasonic AG-DVX100 is a most excellent camera for standard 30p or 60i footage and easily comparable to the Canon or Sony equivalents. I am no camera intellect, and would appreciate the "experts" opinions on the validity of this statement. It just seems to me that we have let the 24p feature of the camera belittle its other great qualities, in good old non filmic 29.97.
Thank you very much for reading, please contribute your thoughts...