Jose Milan
May 5th, 2009, 02:53 AM
Hello I just got a new computer...Precision Core 2 Quad + 8 Gig + 3 Sata Hardrive (1disk -160 Gigs, 2disk -1 Tera each).
I would want the programs to go as fast as possible with what I have, and take advantage of dynamic lynk (premiere + after effects) which seems to require a lot of power..I plan to install diferent OS and programs in the 160 gig disk and leave the other 2 for footage.
1. In the 160 disk have different partitions (one for each OS--win or vista 64's--plus space for programs), I dont know if I should make a partition for a "windows swap" I know you can tell windows to use it but not sure it really takes advantage of it.
2. Then leave one of the tera disk for raw footage only (without partitions).
3. The other 1 tera disk for cache, final rendering, etc...(without partitions).
What I said before, I would like to have very little bottlenecks and be the fastest possible with this tree disk (no raid or anything just using the logic of partitions).
Do you think is a good compromise?
Thanks.
I would want the programs to go as fast as possible with what I have, and take advantage of dynamic lynk (premiere + after effects) which seems to require a lot of power..I plan to install diferent OS and programs in the 160 gig disk and leave the other 2 for footage.
1. In the 160 disk have different partitions (one for each OS--win or vista 64's--plus space for programs), I dont know if I should make a partition for a "windows swap" I know you can tell windows to use it but not sure it really takes advantage of it.
2. Then leave one of the tera disk for raw footage only (without partitions).
3. The other 1 tera disk for cache, final rendering, etc...(without partitions).
What I said before, I would like to have very little bottlenecks and be the fastest possible with this tree disk (no raid or anything just using the logic of partitions).
Do you think is a good compromise?
Thanks.