Gints Klimanis
April 21st, 2004, 03:42 PM
I want to isolate a subject's voice and very local sounds, but I want to simultaneously
record a proximal version, an ambient version and perhaps several subjects simultaneously in a sporting event. So, I'm looking at recording several tracks. More wireless mics still wouldn't solve the problem, as more tracks are still needed. An economical and durable solution would be body-mounted recorders with local microphones. The current crop of MP3/voice recorders com to mind. A 512 MByte flash card can record nearly an hour of uncompressed, stereo, 16-bit audio. So,
for under $200, I can cover a subject without worrying about electromagnetic transmission problems. The main problem would be synchronization in post production. A click track would work, but that involves some labor. I could sync the remote MP3 recorder clocks, but I don't know if any devices actually time
stamp their flash card files with sample accuracy.
Is anyone in this group doing this?
Any better ideas?
record a proximal version, an ambient version and perhaps several subjects simultaneously in a sporting event. So, I'm looking at recording several tracks. More wireless mics still wouldn't solve the problem, as more tracks are still needed. An economical and durable solution would be body-mounted recorders with local microphones. The current crop of MP3/voice recorders com to mind. A 512 MByte flash card can record nearly an hour of uncompressed, stereo, 16-bit audio. So,
for under $200, I can cover a subject without worrying about electromagnetic transmission problems. The main problem would be synchronization in post production. A click track would work, but that involves some labor. I could sync the remote MP3 recorder clocks, but I don't know if any devices actually time
stamp their flash card files with sample accuracy.
Is anyone in this group doing this?
Any better ideas?