Michael Best
August 4th, 2004, 06:33 AM
3 minute video rendered mpeg2, watched it and it's over only
2/3 of the way through? Any ideas? Thanks
2/3 of the way through? Any ideas? Thanks
View Full Version : Clip shortened in render Michael Best August 4th, 2004, 06:33 AM 3 minute video rendered mpeg2, watched it and it's over only 2/3 of the way through? Any ideas? Thanks Edward Troxel August 4th, 2004, 07:07 AM So you are saying you have a 3 minute clip, you render to MPEG2, and you only have the first 2 minutes worth? Did you possibly have a loop region around the first 2 minutes and, when rendering, only rendered the loop region? Michael Best August 4th, 2004, 07:13 AM Edward, no, definitely no loop regions. There are a lot of edits in the piece, to the point that it would barely play in the preview window but I don't see how that would impact this problem. Patrick King August 4th, 2004, 07:15 AM Edward, You're unbelievable. I've had that very thing happen to me (several times) but I didn't recall that as a possible solution. How do you remember all this stuff? Do you have a little 'pre-render checklist' that you use (deselect loop region, select resample if desired, unmute all tracks, etc)? Edward Troxel August 4th, 2004, 08:05 AM Michael, what happens if you render to DV-AVI first and then render THAT file to MPEG? Edward Troxel August 4th, 2004, 08:07 AM Patrick, no specific checklist. I DO make sure I do not have a loop region selected before I start to render (unless I specifically want to selectively render a small section). Otherwise, just a quick double-check of the "Render - As" checkboxes (mainly have to determine whether or not to include markers!) Michael Best August 4th, 2004, 08:16 AM Edward, I haven't tried that but I can, what would that be accomplishing? Edward Troxel August 4th, 2004, 09:46 AM Just wondering if there was a complex area that the MPEG2 render was getting hung on and, therefore, wasn't finishing. A loop area is still the most logical reason, though. Kind of grasping at straws here. Michael Best August 4th, 2004, 10:18 AM I'll try some other things and check for consistency. Thanks very much Rob Lohman August 5th, 2004, 06:45 AM This will probably sound silly as well, but check your free disk space on your temp drive. Michael Best August 5th, 2004, 06:53 AM Rob, are you referring to a 'temporary file folder'? Rob Lohman August 5th, 2004, 07:05 AM Yes, it points to a directory on a harddisk. This disk might be full? (or your MPEG's final output directory) Michael Best August 5th, 2004, 07:07 AM My drives are set up as follows 100 gig split 20% C: / 80% E: 100 gig H: 160 gig I: External Firewire drive My operating system is on C: (space remaining on this partition is low) Vegas is on E: Captured Files/Projects are on H: sometimes I: Also, moderately edited projects max out the CPU when previewing, P4 2.53. Ram is running at 50% of capacity. I can't believe I have to render everything all the time just to see if a single edit was what I was looking for. Michael Best August 5th, 2004, 07:08 AM Can I redirect where it points to? I don't want it pointing to my primary drive. I thought I had all Preferences, Properties, etc set up right, maybe not. Rob Lohman August 5th, 2004, 07:18 AM Yes you can, just follow the instructions in the manual/help. Edward Troxel August 5th, 2004, 07:22 AM File - Properties - Video tab is the pre-rendered files location. File - Properties - Audio tab is the recorded files folder (audio). Options - Preferences - General tab is the temporary files location. Michael Best August 5th, 2004, 07:42 AM Thank you. See any issues with the way my drives are set up? Is there any part of Vegas that automatically sets itself up on the C: drive? I don't want anything there. It was installed on the E: drive but most preferences were initally located on the C: drive (I'm sure by default) until I changed them. I just want to make sure I didn't miss anything. Thanks again for your help. Patrick King August 5th, 2004, 11:44 AM Michael, Just out of curiosity, why don't you want Vegas on the C: drive? That is where MS Windows is looking for programs to be located. Windows will look for files anywhere, but AFAIK, prefers programs to be nested in the C:\Programs folder. I'm aware of the throughput advantage of not placing avi or mpeg files on the C: drive, put have never heard of any advantage to placing program files on a separate drive. Is there an advantage? Michael Best August 5th, 2004, 12:26 PM Unfortunately my computers were put together prior to my getting into video otherwise my set up would be different. It's not a separate drive, it's partitioned. This is how I orignally set it up, one for the os and programs, the other partition for music files. I put Vegas on the E: partition because the C: partition is getting low on space. The whole thing needs reconfigured really but in the meantime I'm trying to spot problem areas. I have a lot of equipment on that computer and want to use it as my primary editing piece. I see no advantage. |