Ed Liew
November 5th, 2004, 09:28 PM
hi,
this is the scenario. bought something from the net, item was not working from day one it arrived. contact the manufacturer, some how got them to reply and subsequently got them to replace one of the part. guess what, the part is not working either. so i contacted them again. good news is, this time round they asked me to send the whole set back to be replace but the shipping cost would be on me. my question is, why do i have to pay for the extra costing while i'm the one being stuck with a not working item from the very begining?
i'm from malaysia and i'm not familiar with US law. can anyone advise me on my next cause of action. appreciate all the help.
thank you.
ed
this is the scenario. bought something from the net, item was not working from day one it arrived. contact the manufacturer, some how got them to reply and subsequently got them to replace one of the part. guess what, the part is not working either. so i contacted them again. good news is, this time round they asked me to send the whole set back to be replace but the shipping cost would be on me. my question is, why do i have to pay for the extra costing while i'm the one being stuck with a not working item from the very begining?
i'm from malaysia and i'm not familiar with US law. can anyone advise me on my next cause of action. appreciate all the help.
thank you.
ed