View Full Version : Filmcrew arrested - warning


Rob Lohman
January 30th, 2005, 07:44 AM
From local news here in Holland (translated by myself):The police have arrested a filmcrew on saturday, after local residents alarmed them. It turned out the crew where students. One of them wanted to make a movie for a school project. One student had a hood on and was pointing a rifle at another student.

Local residents where scared and contact the police. Three men and two women where taking down to the police station for disturbing public order. After questioning the detainees where released with a warrant
The warrant in this case is simply to decide what kind of punishment
they'll receive for this.

In the end it all went down well, the police here aren't too trigger
happy, but definitely a situation you want to avoid!

Richard Alvarez
January 30th, 2005, 08:16 AM
Yeah, this sort of thing happens more often then people think. Really, for those who espouse guerilla filmmaking, of the "easier to get forgiveness than permisssion" school - The caveat would be any sort of scene that contains violence. IN today's world, walking around dressed as a terrorist, carrying even mock weapons, is foolish.

Boyd Ostroff
January 30th, 2005, 09:31 AM
About 7 or 8 years ago something similar happened in my neighborhood. Some high school students were making a film early in the morning where they staged a phoney robbery at a local bank in a small shopping center. What they didn't realize was that same bank had actually been robbed TWICE during the past year (which was a particular hot button since this is a very low crime suburban area). Same sort of thing, a neighbor saw people with masks and guns running around in front of the bank and called the police. Luckily nobody was hurt, and IIRC they let the students go - after giving them a big scare!

James Emory
January 30th, 2005, 11:51 AM
I know the feeling. The police came to one of our locations while shooting the latest season of MTV's Room Raiders. If you're not familiar, it is an abduction type show. The cast members know they're going to be on an MTV show but don't know which one. That's how to ensure that they are there when we arrive and to get that surprised look on their face. We pull into any given neighborhood at 7 a.m. with a 5 vehicle caravan, jump out, and run up to a house and drag someone to the generic white abduction van, push them in and then it speeds off. If you didn't know what was going on, you just might think someone was being taken against their will. But you know, the cameras and the audio guy just seem to be a hint that it might not be for real.

Here are some production images from crew D (1 of 5) at work snatching people.

www.mo-freek.com/roomraidersstills.html

Rick Bravo
January 30th, 2005, 08:33 PM
One thing is to go out and shoot your little film and beg forgiveness if you are challenged, the other is to escalate the situation by doing things that, when seen by someone who has no clue about what is happening gets involved. That brings me to Rob's post.

Let's look at the key element in Rob's post...

<<<One student had a hood on and was pointing a rifle at another student.>>>

...need I say more?

As for the abduction shoots. Never underestimate the tunnel vision of someone who thinks there is something seriously wrong happening and doesn't hesitate to act on it. Here in Miami, you'd probably get shot by a "Good Samaritan"!

While police officers are trained observers, your average Joe isn't, this is where the situation can turn catastrophic.

RB

Rob Lohman
January 31st, 2005, 04:59 AM
One of the reasons I'm glad no-one is allowed to have guns here
(besides the police).

I guess putting up big signs stating you are shooting a movie,
letting the local police know and informing the local residents
(put a piece of paper in their mailboxes?) will go a long way to
avoid problems I'd say. For the scene in my Lady X episode where
I was tied down to a chair and there was a gun and whatnot I'd
made sure someone was outside the building on the look out to
make sure anyone could be kept away from the action or at least
informed as to what went down.

James: you did room raiders? hah, funny. We have that show on
MTV here as well, hehe.

James Emory
January 31st, 2005, 11:33 AM
Rob. Yes, I just worked on Room Raiders Atlanta, season 4. There were 5 crews shooting 8 weekends straight this past fall each producing 1 episode per weekend. There were two camera operators per crew, A and B, and I was B camera on A crew.

Do you get American Room Raiders or is it shot in your area for your market? Granada, the producer, is based in the UK and I believe is going to do a UK version as well if it's not already in production.

Mike Rehmus
January 31st, 2005, 11:28 PM
I shoot a lot of student scenes both at the local community college and out in the surrounding towns. We've learned to call the PD on campus and in the town whenever someone is acting out violence with or without weapons.

2 reasons:

1, we don't want an unfortunate accident involving a helpful bystander or the police.

2., we don't want to waste the time of the local PD by having them respond to a call (sometimes Code 3) only to find out it is a video production.

Oh, and we never allow them to use 'real' weapons unloaded or not. They are either plastic or the barrel has to be permanently obstructed. No blue tape around the muzzle!

Simon Wyndham
February 3rd, 2005, 04:44 AM
On Soul Searcher http://www.soulsearchermovie.com we had a shoot in a multi-storey carpark. We had a great big HMI, the cameras, and somebody dressed up as a demon with bright red skinand raggedy clothes. He also had some swords.

This had all been cleared by the police weeks before, and then cleared again on the night we were shooting. Despire how completely obvious it was that this was a film shoot from all the multitude of equipment, and crewmembers standing around, and despite the police clearance, it still didn't stop us being visited TWICE by police after people had phoned them to say a fight was going on! At one point we had been told by the boys in blue that the armed response team had been put on alert as a result!

So, the lesson is even if you have explicit clearance from the police, you may still have to answer to them. I wouldn't consider doing anything involving arms or fighting in a public place without consulting with them first. In this barmy day and age when everyone is considered a terrorist until proven innocent its not worth the risk.

As an extra aside, it's not even worth getting your action film publicity shots developed at a public laboratory! I was met by armed response guys when I had the stills for The Silencer developed! Check out the link at the bottom of my post. Note the big eighties style smokey background. For some STUPID reason the photo developer guys phoned me in as a possible armed criminal!

Rob Lohman
February 3rd, 2005, 04:46 AM
James: I'm 99% sure it is the US version, have no idea which season
or anything since I barely watch it. Just zap by it sometimes...

Marco Leavitt
February 3rd, 2005, 07:43 AM
Last year the New Yorker had an article about the screenwriter/director Larry Cohen. In his early days he didn't have much of a budget, and to save money he had his actors sneek their way into the St. Patrick's Day parade in New York City and open fire with blanks into the crowd! Guess those days are long gone. You'd go to prison for a stunt like that today.

Joshua Starnes
February 3rd, 2005, 10:23 AM
<<<-- Originally posted by Rick Bravo : While police officers are trained observers, your average Joe isn't, this is where the situation can turn catastrophic.

RB -->>>

And even police officers will freak out if they decide they know what is going on.

A friend of mine used to work for a prop company in LA, and one night he was driving a prop truck to a shooting location. It was filled mainly with fake body parts and fake guns. He was late and he was speeding and a police officer pulled him over. Needless to say, as soon as he looked in the back of the van he freaked out. He though Scott and the rest of the guys were arms dealers.

Even though everything in that truck was obviously made of rubber from the moment you touched it, they were taken down to the station anyway. One of the producers had to come down and explain things.

You just never know how people are going to react.

Rick Bravo
February 4th, 2005, 09:32 AM
Marco,

Forget days gone by, they should have gone to jail back then for doing something so stupidly irresponsible!

If I was a person in that crowd, especially as a parent with kids watching the parade, the last thing in the world those idiots would have had to worry about would be the police.

Trust me when I tell you that going to jail would have been a better alternative to what my reaction would have been!

RB

Joe Carney
February 4th, 2005, 11:25 AM
>>Let's look at the key element in Rob's post...

<<<One student had a hood on and was pointing a rifle at another student.>>>
<<

Well another way to look at this...

If in NYC it's a great way to keep the muggers away.
(Just kidding)

Marco Leavitt
February 4th, 2005, 12:31 PM
Rick,
I hear you. I wouldn't be above stealing the occasional shot, but you have to have at least a LITTLE common sense. I think they were lucky the police didn't return fire. I do think it's sad though that things have swung so far in the other direction that you can get in trouble for wandering too close to a government building with a camcorder. Surely there's some middle ground here that we can all live with.

Rick Bravo
February 4th, 2005, 04:28 PM
Marco,

Some would like to blame the government, that of course, is the easy thing to do. Some say it's a kneejerk reaction, some say it's overkill. I don't exactly see it that way.

You're absolutely correct, it is sad that in this day and age we have reverted to how things were many years ago, but...

as long as you have these animals that are hell bent on terrorizing the citizenry of this country with the ultimate goal of one day destroying it, I for one, am more than willing to put up with some inconveniences to help protect us from further attacks.

I was just in DC last November and and had absolutley no problems taking pictures anywhere we went. This includes the White House while the POTUS was in residence. We had just left the Old Ebbitt Grill about 1 block from the White House and a group of us hung out in front of the South Lawn fence at about 10:30pm...we even struck up a pretty cool conversation with the Uniformed Secret Service agent that was assigned to that post.

I think that people that make such huge deals about the whole videotaping / photographing thing have their own agendas.

Granted, if you fit a certain "profile", you may have a slightly more difficult time than others that don't. We live in a very scary time where you can't really tell the good guys from the bad guys so, some concessions have to be made.

The one thing that the powers that be need to do, is to streamline the way security is carried out, especially in airports!

Again, who's to blame? I can tell you one thing, It's not our government!

RB

Marco Leavitt
February 4th, 2005, 10:50 PM
Yeah, but I fail to see how restricting camcorders makes anybody safer. What exactly is it that they think they are preventing?

Rick Bravo
February 5th, 2005, 09:06 AM
It's more a matter of restricting certain individuals from intelligence gathering.

One thing is to shoot footage of well known public monuments and buildings that have been photographed millions of times, it's another,, completely different thing to be unusually interested in nuclear powerplants, electrical grids and out of the way public buildings that hold no historical interest.

And as I stated before, the "profile" that you fit also plays a factor in the degree of harrassment!

RB

Marco Leavitt
February 5th, 2005, 10:20 AM
Yeah, but does anybody really believe that such footage would be crucial to planning an attack? Even if you do believe that, given the shrinking nature of camcorders and cameras, it's flat out impossible to prevent the bad guys from taking those pictures. At best, restrictions on videotaping are a silly waste of time, and at worst, a frightening expansion of the police state.

Rick Bravo
February 5th, 2005, 12:58 PM
OK, we're not getting anywhere with this, so, goodbye.

RB

Heath McKnight
February 23rd, 2005, 11:26 PM
I should've been tougher on a student shooting a film where a guy walks up and blows away another guy in a park. It came out well, but the gun was VERY realistic. Some cops pulled up (we didn't have a permit, which is free and my school provides the insurance), but drove away. But our star had to hide the realistic fake gun. Suffice to say, we shot the final shoot out in an empty field behind the school. Which made it scarier and cooler!

About 8 years ago, some students from a film school in Orlando had actors put on hoods and use a non-working antique gun and did a scene in DOWNTOWN ORLANDO! Suffice to say, about 10 cop cars showed up, about 15 cops or so, all guns drawn. The college got HELL for that, and that's BAD to secure future locations.

heath

James Emory
June 18th, 2005, 11:41 PM
I recently saw an episode of Punk'd on MTV and the celebrity victim actually called 911 because the prank scared them so bad. Now, how do you suppose they got out of that one. Could that production company be liable for inducing a call and tying up the lines all for entertainment reasons? After the celebrity called they immediately stopped the action and revealed that it was a prank but the call had already been made. I don't really think its a big deal but I do wonder how they might explain it.

Peter Jefferson
July 17th, 2005, 07:17 AM
"But you know, the cameras and the audio guy just seem to be a hint that it might not be for real."

but thats what i dont get.. are people this selectively blind??

Nathan Chaszeyka
July 17th, 2005, 09:58 AM
I have to argue with a lot the things I have read in this post. I personally find it refreshing that in many cases concerned citizens have called in about something that they have thought as potentially dangerous. In this day and age there are far too many instances where witnesses and citizens could have helped but refused to get involved and someone dies or is victimized.

I understand that having to deal with police is a tremendous hassle, trust me I know as many of the shots I take are inherently tresspassing, but in the long run of things shooting a video comes second to the livelihood of our fellow citizens.

And as far as filming gov't buildings goes, there have in fact been instances where terrorists cased potential attacks using video. Whether or not the gov't can stop this makes no difference, they are doing every thing they can in their eyes to make a difference. I do not wish to argue politics on here though.

Stephen Finton
August 8th, 2005, 08:47 AM
Call the police BEFORE shooting a scene that might be misconstrued as real. Have a deputy or two standing there, drinking coffee. My friend's dad just got finished shooting a convenient store robbery and had his daughter, who is a deputy, show up and stand around. No big deal. Police like to be a part of the movie making process, too.

Anders Risvold
August 10th, 2005, 01:24 AM
A filmsmaker was shooting a robberyscene at a bar. Someone neglected to take notice of the lightning, cameras and crew and called the cops. The director got a fine.

I was shooting a medieval combatscene in an abandoned and ruined church the following week, so I was very quick to call and send notice.

I was quite impressed though. They asked if I needed assistance to keep people away from the scene. I didnt follow up on that offer and it was a very nice session. Lots of smallchildren familys taking their sundaywalk there, and they had a blast watching the armoured grownups battling it out.

Heath McKnight
August 10th, 2005, 06:31 AM
ALWAYS let the cops know, for sure! When my student wanted to shoot a gun fight scene on the side of a road (near the police station) I insisted we shoot behind the school in an empty field. It looked better.

heath