I'm an experienced still photographer, so I have a grasp of shutter speed and aperture in a still camera, but I'm a video newb and a little confused with the application of shutter speed in video cameras. If you could indulge me and help me to understand the basics of shutter speed in a video camera, it would be much appreciated.

I understand that increased shutter speed in a still camera "stops" the action more as the shutter speed increases, but rarely do I see any advice to use some of the higher shutter speed capabilities of the EX3. It appears the standard is to choose a shutter speed that's double the frame rate - is this correct? If so, why is this preferred and for what purpose are the higher shutter speeds used? I noticed the EX3 can go up to 1/500.

There's also an option to shut off the shutter. For what purpose is this mode and is the result more desireable in some circumstances?

Lastly, is the shutter speed indicated in fractions of a second as in still cameras, or is the unit of measurement different?

Any feedback is much appreciated.

Hi
If you use a very high shutter speed when shooting video, you get a very "video" or "homevideo" feel to the footage.
Usually you double the shutterspeed to the framerate to get some motionblur and thus a more pleasing image.
You can of course use the shutterspeed for effect. If you have seen Saving Private Ryan, the opening scene is shot with a 45 degree shutter (you use angels on 35mm cameras).
This is similar to high shutterspeed.
It gives you a kind of strobe effect since there is no motion blur at all.
The shutter speed is in fraction of a second.

When I shoot sports I do tend to use a bit higher shutter speed, like 100-250 (PAL land)

When I was in LA shooting with a PAL camera under fluorescent light I got a pulsating image when using a shutter of 1/50.
Changing the shutter to 1/60 solves the problem.
The shutter matches the frequency og the electric network, (Europe 50hz and US 60hz)

You can also use a high speed shutter for effect. The fighting scenes in Gladiator and the D-day scen in Saving private Ryan are two good examples of how a high speed shutter intensifies the "feel" of the scenes.

Thank you both very much for the information. What is the effect of turning the shutter off?

Turning the shutter off, in progressive frame mode, gives a shutter speed inversely equal to the frame rate. For example, 25 fps will be 1.25th second. More obvious when you think in terms of shutter angle, shutter off being equivalent to a 360 degree shutter angle. Maybe this is obvious only if you are used to film cameras, which have a mechanical rotating shutter.

If I´m not mistaken it just sets the shutterspeed to "standard". 1/50 if you shoot 25P etc

When shutter is off the shutter is still active and will operate at either the frame rate in progressive or the field rate in interlace. So at 25P it will be 1/25th and at 50i it will be 1/50th.

If I´m not mistaken it just sets the shutterspeed to "standard". 1/50 if you shoot 25P etc

Not quite so:)

With 25p, shutter off equals 1/25th of a second, meaning frame rate=shutter rate.

With 50i, shutter off equals 1/50th of a second, meaning field rate=shutter rate.

Oops, looks like we were typing simultaneously, Alister:)

Thanks for clearing that up. I just presumed it would simulate film shooting when in 25p and since a 35mm camera with a 180 degree shutter has the equivalent at a 1/48 shutter speed

My non-technical suggestion would be too shoot some video with and without the shutter turned on. When ever you turn on the shutter you loose a little light sensitivity. The faster shutter speed you set, the more light sensitivity you loose.

I normally shoot with the shutter off. But if I have to do a lot of panning or I'm shooting fast moving objects, I turn the shutter on. But if definitely give your footage a different look (more flicker) so you need to decide for yourself whether you like the look or not.

Good luck! :)

I've always felt the shutter off mode is kind of misleading as a camera menu convention. It's always on you're just matching frame rate to shutter speed. Also I usually go up one notch from that because right at 'shutter off' motion is smeary with ghost trails that look distinctly video-ish. Whereas 1/100 or more makes things look far too strobby unless you're going for Saving Private Ryan. Looks cool on sports though.

Noah

Thanks again for all the guidance. Yes, I could just turn the camera on and shoot at the various shutter speeds, but I don't even know the scanarios in which the differences might become apparent. I don't expect to learn everything from the forums, but I'm being "baptised by fire" so to speak, and I truly appreciate any guidance that will help to prevent a mistake on my part because I didn't know to look out "X" under "Y" conditions.

So, if you will indulge me, I'd like to follow up on one of the comments that shutter speed of 1/100 will cause a strobe effect like Saving Private Ryan (good to know, thank you) then for what purpose would I need shutter speeds of up to 1/2000 as provided by the EX-3? Is there any reason to shoot with much quicker shutter speeds, or is it just a marketing tool for the "it must be better - the shutter goes all the way up to 1/2000" crowd?

I'm pretty sure (though I have no proof) that Spielberg used far higher shutter speeds than 1/100th sec for bits of Band of Brothers, Minority Report, Ryan.

Look at it this way - if you shoot at 1/50th sec (PAL) your camcorder captures everything, so each field starts where the other left off. So a car crossing the frame shows smooth subject blur. If you shoot at 1/100th there's less subject blur, but it's as if every other field has been deleted. At 1/200th sec it's as if 3 out of 4 fields have been deleted, and action starts to look jerky.

But Ryan's staccato scenes were far more likely to be shot at 1/500th sec per frame to really ram home the effect. Speeds up to 1/2000th sec are fun speeds more than anything - you'll need lots of light of course but you'll capture sharp 'drops of milk into the tea' sort of shots.

When I shoot my swimmers with a view to printing or emailing frames I switch out the NDs and select something like 1/600th sec. At 25 fps I can catch the peak of the action (dives, butterfly etc) with hardly any camera or motion blur evident. Watching the footage as a video though is not nice - more like a flip-book of motor-drive frames.

tom.

When you think about it, for all the range of shutter speeds, aperture, gain and focal lengths etc available on our cameras there often is remarkably little choice as to what combination to use if we have a clear idea of how the shot is to look and are striving for the highest technical quality. For the novice it can be daunting to know where to start with all the variables. For the more experienced it can be more like finding the one combination that will nail it without putting unrealistic constraints on the lighting.

But Ryan's staccato scenes were far more likely to be shot at 1/500th sec per frame

They used a 45 degree shutter. Closest you can get with the EX would be 1/180th or thereabouts.

So slow Simon? It's just that in still photography terms 1/180th isn't considered fast at all. I must freeze the DVD when some of the shrapnel flies and see what I think.

Apparently in some scenes they did some frame doubling. But for the most part it was a 45 degree shutter.

When I have used a similar effect myself in action sequences to make it more frantic I have often used 1/180th. 1/500th is too fast I feel and takes the effect overboard IMHO.

Shot wakeboarding footage all this weekend. I used 1/120 Shutter speed. Generally I use the basic rule of 1/48 for 24p and 1/60 for 30p. I love a filmic look and for the most part I achieve most of what i want for that look through picture profiles and the use of depth of field. Wakeboarding however, looks really good at 1/120 shutter speed making everything pop a little more. I really haven't messed with a lot of shutter speeds because I am generally comfortable with those couple of settings. I would love to see an in depth explanation tutorial video on the shutter settings on the EX1&3 because some of the settings still have me confused as to their Actual intended purpose.

I generally don't use 60i. Still scratching my head on usefulness other than direct to broadcast. However, I could only see shooting it that way if it was either live or had minimal time till airtime. If your running your footage through editing and you got time, then why not shoot in progressive and output your results however you want after your edit? Maybe, others here can share some other uses for 60i.

I am pretty sure that on 60i the setting would need to be 1/60. The '60' in 60i refers to fields and not frames. If we took the full frames produced out of 60i it represents 30 fps therefore that would make your shutter speed 1/60th. To understand fields think of it this way: In the US to get one frame on screen, every other line is scanned, and this is known as a field. After that, another scan is done that fills in the missing lines or "the OTHER 'every other line' " LOL. It's probably drawn simpler than typed. Just mesh your fingers together. think of the fingers on one hand as a field and then the fingers on the other hand is the other field. To get the picture, or frame, you need both fields. I know I was confused when I first got into all this. I would rather 60i to be called 30i, as in, 30fps interlaced. It just seems more consistent when discussing FRAME RATES. I've never seen a camera that says FIELD RATES. LOL! The 60 generally throws people off at first.

Ok, I could go into PAL but not sure if this already book-long post needs to be any bigger..plus, I don't ever use PAL....if someone across the pond feels like explaining then go for it.

Yes Colin, it's a little daunting. Having a backgroud in still photography, the concepts of aperture, basic shutter speed, gain and focal length are easy enough to understand, but the association of frame rate and the referring to shutter speed in terms of degrees and how that effects your result are somewhat confusing. I can't imagine how much my head would be spinning if I were more "green." ;-) I've learned a lot in just a few days from you guys, so thanks to all that are making it easier for me to get up to speed.

I don't care for the look of interlaced video but one thing to keep in mind is that an interlaced setting will increase the camera sensitivity by a fair amount - a couple stops if i remember correctly.

I don't care for the look of interlaced video but one thing to keep in mind is that an interlaced setting will increase the camera sensitivity by a fair amount - a couple stops if i remember correctly.

Just one full stop, and can easily be matched in progressive by switching the shutter off.