Pete Wilie
July 2nd, 2005, 09:53 AM
I have been reading about the Greg Winters audio mod (http://www.gregjwinter.com/modification2.htm) for Sony VX1000, VX2100, PD150, and PD170 that provides a 20db improvement in S/N. His original mod was for the VX series. For Greg's comments specific to the PD170 see his post VX2100 Schematic and Mod (http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showpost.php?p=175767&postcount=10). See Winterized PD150 Before & After (http://www.forums.dv.com/jive3/thread.jspa;jsessionid=0YCCW2XK32DWKQSNDBCSKH0CJUMEKJVN?untiRecursion=true&threadID=300006513) for tests/comments by Jay Rose (http://www.dplay.com/).
While I very much like obtaining this improvement in audio, I am concerned about modifying my PD170. And I really wonder if it is necessary for the PD170.
Rather than modifying a PD170, I wonder if an alternative approach would provide just as good audio.
If the audio quality of your PD170 (which has a 6db improvement in S/N over the PD150) is still not acceptable, then what about using the PD170 LINE IN with an external mixer/preamp, or recording audio to a separate device like either of these devices:
1. iRiver Portable Digital Recorders-Players (http://www.iriveramerica.com/prod/ultra/700/)
2. Sony Hi-MD™ Walkman® Digital Music PlayerMZ-RH910 (http://www.sonystyle.com/is-bin/INTERSHOP.enfinity/eCS/Store/en/-/USD/SY_DisplayProductInformation-Start?CategoryName=pa_DigitalMusicPlayers_MiniDisc_HiMDWalkman&ProductSKU=MZRH910&TabName=acc&DCMP=CNET_DF)
The price of either of these is significantly less than the Greg Winters mod, plus it gives you the added benefit of recording audio independently from the camcorder. And it continues to work for any camcorder you now have, or may purchase in the future.
Wouldn't using the PD170 LINE IN bypass the noisy PD170 preamp that is fixed by the Winter's mod?
With the Winter's mod to the PD170 you have to buy some type of mixer/preamp to generate the LINE input the mod expects. With the other recording devices, you have a choice of using either mic or line inputs. I would imagine for best audio you would still want to purchase a mixer/preamp to feed the audio recording device.
Your thoughts/comments?
While I very much like obtaining this improvement in audio, I am concerned about modifying my PD170. And I really wonder if it is necessary for the PD170.
Rather than modifying a PD170, I wonder if an alternative approach would provide just as good audio.
If the audio quality of your PD170 (which has a 6db improvement in S/N over the PD150) is still not acceptable, then what about using the PD170 LINE IN with an external mixer/preamp, or recording audio to a separate device like either of these devices:
1. iRiver Portable Digital Recorders-Players (http://www.iriveramerica.com/prod/ultra/700/)
2. Sony Hi-MD™ Walkman® Digital Music PlayerMZ-RH910 (http://www.sonystyle.com/is-bin/INTERSHOP.enfinity/eCS/Store/en/-/USD/SY_DisplayProductInformation-Start?CategoryName=pa_DigitalMusicPlayers_MiniDisc_HiMDWalkman&ProductSKU=MZRH910&TabName=acc&DCMP=CNET_DF)
The price of either of these is significantly less than the Greg Winters mod, plus it gives you the added benefit of recording audio independently from the camcorder. And it continues to work for any camcorder you now have, or may purchase in the future.
Wouldn't using the PD170 LINE IN bypass the noisy PD170 preamp that is fixed by the Winter's mod?
With the Winter's mod to the PD170 you have to buy some type of mixer/preamp to generate the LINE input the mod expects. With the other recording devices, you have a choice of using either mic or line inputs. I would imagine for best audio you would still want to purchase a mixer/preamp to feed the audio recording device.
Your thoughts/comments?