I want to share this to remind us how important the job of making memories is.
I was cleaning the studio stockrooms to get stuff for our photography & film museum when I came across some old super 8 film reels, upon viewing through our HANIMEX EDITOR I saw that among them was of a wedding of an aunt now living in the states.
I fixed an old YELCO projector so i can "capture"(hehe) the footage onto my NLE so I can restore its color, crop out moldy edges, and in short, edit the film.

It sure was strange to see the images of years past, even stranger to see myself as a 4 year old tugging at my mom who has since past away.

I posted the material online so the couple can finally see their wedding movie FOR THE FIRST TIME AFTER 37 yrs!

So anyway, it felt weird but nice, I mean, its not everyday you get a chance to edit something that old.

My cousin told me on FB that her parents were crying watching it for the first time! My Uncle messaged me his thanks for "..bringing back to life their love!"

I guess a marriage has been through a lot of typhoons if it lasted 37 years then here you are watching for the first time how that commitment all started!

I haven't seen them in a very long while since they migrated to the states. And its nice to think that somehow halfway around the world pieces of good memories came back from where it all started.

Heres the clip, the film was heavily damaged by mold, I left as much frames as i could so they can savor the images.

The only "new" material I added is the beginning titles which I made to look like old in the NLE to match the rest.
The "the end" graphic at the last is also from our old stock of different "the end" reels from the same years.

Link:Ester & Arthur 1973 By Ted Ramasola On ExposureRoom (http://exposureroom.com/esterarthur/)

Thank you for sharing this beautiful story.

Great post. Actually choked me up. Neat to see the old footage as well.

Thanks.

Ted - this is great. I did the same thing a few years ago. My dad was the family cinematographer and captured just about every family and friend wedding with his super 8 cam from like 1960 to to the late 70s. Ironically his camera broke and he never captured my wedding! I dug out the reels, converted and posted online. There are still two weddings that I haven't been able to reach the couple to let them know there out there. Anyway - good deed for your work and it sounds like you brought some joy to your aunt.

Art

I posted this on another forum and one member wondered,

" if any of our modern media can be readable 37 years from now?"

hhmm..

I was telling my staff, today were having a hard time finding, VHS players, Betamax players, etc to be able to transfer old files.
But the analog reels of the 60s and probably much older in other cases can still be wound through a mechanical projector and you can still view them.

Picture quality is grainy, dark, jittery. No natural audio. Cuts are abrupt and haphazard. Poor camera work, with shots drifting out of focus and not stable. In desperate need of color grading as picture looks faded or overblown... just terrible by today's standards.

Yet strangely, I watched the entire 11 min clip and was mesmerized the whole time. Hmmm. I also think I got something in my eyes by the third song.

Thanks for sharing this amazing footage! It's a time machine! I totally loved it.

And your uncle was smart enough to shoot enough coverage to tell a story for you to edit.

Though I can't help but wonder how much would it cost telecine or film scan it like how Hollywood does it to remove the "flicker"?

Picture quality is grainy, dark, jittery. No natural audio. Cuts are abrupt and haphazard. Poor camera work, with shots drifting out of focus and not stable. In desperate need of color grading as picture looks faded or overblown... just terrible by today's standards.


I know Ian went on to say how much he enjoyed it, but the above is a little harsh. Apart from the ageing of the dyes in the film stock and the obvious damage to the film itself, the method of transfer to video is not ideal. Some of the focus drift and lack of stability is due to the projector rather than the camera or operator. The jump cuts are indeed distracting, but the camera work is not actually that bad by amateur standards of the time.

For those who have not actually shot on Super 8 it is worth pointing out that because the maximum shooting time on a Super 8 cartridge only was 3-4 minutes, the normal practice was that most scenes were a few seconds long, a style which does not lend itself to the filming of this type of event. Changing cartridges was fairly quick, but unless you were running 2 or more cameras (extravangant!) the action was only ever going to be sampled. Jump cuts could be avoided by shooting lots of cutaways or sympathetic editing.

As John has said it would be interesting to know how much it would cost to have it telecined to minimise the loss of quality in the transfer process.

Thanks for posting. And my thanks to the unknown cameraman.

Ted, this is incredible!! Really, really great. AND... it's interesting to see that even in 1973, the photographer was STILL getting in the way of the videographer's shot. ;)

Loved it!! Despite the age and quality of the video, it is a sweet memory nevertheless. Enjoyed the whole 11 minutes of it. Reminds me not to trash any of my video away. In 37 years, I might be watching my own wedding video from Mars or in my Millenium Falcon hovering over the moon.. hmmm...

Bill, Yeah! The stills guy is always in the shot! LOL!

Johannes, I also wonder if we can still view our weddings in 37 years!

I married my high school sweetheart in 09, there where 4 cams in that wedding, 2 JVC HD100/200, 1 DVX100, and 1 RED ONE cam.

I havent had the time to view and edit them!! :-(

That is so cool! I had to tweet about it because it's not very often a couple gets to see their wedding video for the first time 37 years later. Very moving. Well done!

Ten years ago, I heard an NPR story about a family that had lost their mother, and only had a very brief thirty second segment of an old VHS tape of her as a 'moving memory'. Apparently, she was extremely camera shy and hated to be photographed in any form.

The interview brought up a memory of my childhood... pre-kindergarten - of BRIGHT movie lights in my eyes at various Christmas gatherings of my childhood. I knew my family was too poor to own a movie camera, so I asked my dad about it. "Did someone on our side of the family shoot home movies when we were kids?"

"Oh yeah, that'd be your Uncle D. I remember him shooting way back then." (Late fifties through early sixties)

"Do you think he still has them?"

A week later, my Dad called me to say "Uncle D dropped off a box of old movies and an old projector."

I picked up a screen, and drove out to my dads. Sure enough, there was a paper bag full of 8mm reels (Thirty some odd of them) and an old 8mm Revere projector. "He said he hasn't watched any in decades."

I picked one up that read "Easter, 1960" and vaguely remembered all the cousins hunting eggs in my grandfathers huge back yard.

I threaded up the projector, and turned to my dad. "Are you prepared to see Mom?" She had passed away about six years earlier.

"Oh. ... Yes... I guess so."

I rolled the old print. The color was still vibrant and not thirty seconds in, there was a shot of my mother, walking through the yard carrying a carton of eggs to hide. She couldn't have been more than thirty years old.

"OH MY GOD! My dad shouted. SHE'S BEAUTIFUL!!!"

And indeed, she was.

I managed to transfer all of the old footage, and cut together the scenes that had included my own parents and siblings. We had ten minutes of footage of our early childhood that we had all but 'forgotten'. It was amazing how SEEING the holidays, birthdays and picnics triggered the vivid flood of memories.

The point is, that even a few moments of the most innocuous captured in passing - can be the most heartfelt memories a half a century later.

Also a testament to the durability of film that the Kodachrome of fifty years ago, held up stored in the top of a closet.

Ok na ok to pareng Ted :) Amazing! can't help but get teary eyed watching it..would you mind if i show this sa mga clients namin na indecisive on why they should hire a videographer..i just hope the video formats for today's generation is still watchable after 40 years....

Great job! Thanks for sharing !

Kren
Vertical Video Works* Winnipeg Videography (http://www.verticalvideoworks.ca)

Richard,

Wow, that must have been a very emotional experience for you and your father. It helps me remember why I got into this business in the first place.

Sure Kren, by the way, your not related to them are you?!

The couple in the movie had their "honeymoon baby" named jasmin and she married a Barnes!

Thanks for sharing Ted. This is a treasure for your Aunt.

This reminded me of a story about photog who delivered prints to a couple after 30 years (?). The couple had no money that time and did not claim the prints. The photog cleaning up his studio, discovered the photos, was able to track the couple and hand them the pics for free.

Noel,

We have a ton of those, clients that don't pay after! Haha! In our 47 year operation we had so many clients, with a lot of them just wanna hire us probably for "status symbol" only, a lot never claim their pics.
I guess this was probably due to the fact that most of the weddings that happen are those with pregnant brides.
In our culture several years ago, its taboo to be an unwed mother so they always force the guy into marriage. -it doesnt usually last, cuz usually theyre both young and no money. Claiming their pics is the last thing on their minds.

A lot part ways before the video gets done!

I had a separation after a week, three days, but none will beat the separation AFTER RECEPTION!
Believe it...or not!

Hey Ted,
Good thread! I just had a similar experience, I recently found footage of my parents' wedding that was tucked away at my Aunt's house for almost 50 years! Fortunately, both my parents are still alive and were able to enjoy watching it. Now I can see why some clients want to preserve every frame of whatever we shoot of their wedding. After reviewing my own wedding, here are some things I wished were covered that weren't:
1. The entire receiving line of guests as they congratulated/greeted us at the reception.
2. Shots (either photos or video) of every table of guests.

Some videographers focus only on short form weddings, but I think that's a mistake because they capture only the bride and groom, and forget about the family and guests. The true value of a wedding is seeing everyone that's there to share the celebration. In a few years, a lot of those guests won't be around, and the remaining video footage becomes priceless.

Since finding my parents' film, I've changed my perception of how to shoot a wedding. Instead of shooting for the couple, I now shoot as if I'm shooting for their children's children. I try to balance coverage. I shoot a lot of the couple, but I also tend to focus a lot on the little children, as well as the oldest guests there.