Evan Heckert
June 14th, 2012, 08:15 PM
Hello, all. I do quite a bit of editing on my 17" Macbook Pro 2.4Ghz i7, though I move around a lot (office to home to meetings to on-location shoots, etc.), so I find the new Retina MBP very appealing for it's much lighter weight, great resolution, and increased speed.
I'm wondering what experiences people have had editing 1080p footage from a 5400rpm or 7200rpm USB 3.0 portable drive? I would ideally have one that's powered by the USB port, so it's truly portable - no need for external power.
What would you think the bottleneck would be? Is the 5400rpm drive a bottleneck to USB3.0? Would 7200rpm make a difference?
I've been editing off a powered desktop FW800 drive, which is technically slower from a bandwidth perspective, but I know the technical specs don't always tell the whole story. Just hoping I could glean from the wisdom and experience of those that went before me!
Thank you all!
Evan
PS: Any cost-effective portable USB3 drives you all use & would recommend? Also, would there be a more space-conservative but still easy to use codec than ProRes LT?
I'm wondering what experiences people have had editing 1080p footage from a 5400rpm or 7200rpm USB 3.0 portable drive? I would ideally have one that's powered by the USB port, so it's truly portable - no need for external power.
What would you think the bottleneck would be? Is the 5400rpm drive a bottleneck to USB3.0? Would 7200rpm make a difference?
I've been editing off a powered desktop FW800 drive, which is technically slower from a bandwidth perspective, but I know the technical specs don't always tell the whole story. Just hoping I could glean from the wisdom and experience of those that went before me!
Thank you all!
Evan
PS: Any cost-effective portable USB3 drives you all use & would recommend? Also, would there be a more space-conservative but still easy to use codec than ProRes LT?