View Full Version : Lux Rating on XL-H1


Edwin Hernandez
September 15th, 2005, 08:44 AM
What's the lux rating of this camera?

-EDWIN

Craig Terott
September 15th, 2005, 09:39 AM
Why are camera companies not so forthcoming with this info? Pretty darned inportant to me.

Jean-Philippe Archibald
September 15th, 2005, 09:59 AM
Because it dosen't mean anything... lux rating at 0 db gain or +64626246568 db gain!??! it's only a marketing gimmik, only real world testing can answer this.

Edwin Hernandez
September 15th, 2005, 10:23 AM
Because it dosen't mean anything... lux rating at 0 db gain or +64626246568 db gain!??! it's only a marketing gimmik, only real world testing can answer this.


It is a marketing gimmik, but somehow you get a general idea. If manufacturers state that it's a 3 lux at 12db, I'll start worrying. Right now, we know nothing about it.

Anyone in NYC can answer this? Light performance please!!!

-EDWIN

Eric Brown
September 17th, 2005, 05:34 PM
[QUOTE=Edwin Hernandez]It is a marketing gimmik, but somehow you get a general idea. If manufacturers state that it's a 3 lux at 12db, I'll start worrying. Right now, we know nothing about it.



Guess there'd be no need for that film grain button, eh?

Jacques Mersereau
September 18th, 2005, 08:12 AM
Although this opinion is pure spectulation, I do not expect the HD1
to be a great 'low light' camera. Sony has always been the low light
king. The VX2K is simply amazing.

When you pack MORE pixels into the same small 1/3" footprint,
it doesn't make physical sense, even with great processng, that the
HD1 could outperform, or even equal the VX2K in low light imaging.

Canon has yet to match Sony in low light imaging, but there are
positives and negatives in everything, and the HD1 seems like it
has (for me anyway) a lot going for it.