View Full Version : if you only work by day rates/half day as opposed to hourly, can you explain WHY?


Josh Bass
April 8th, 2015, 10:29 AM
Hi. Like many in the video production field, I dont have an hourly rate, only working by the half day or full day. this is common practice around here (Houston) though I'm sure there are exceptions.

Clients often dont understand the half day/full day thing and reply with "well that seems really expensive for a 3-hour shoot", etc.

How do others explain the reasons for half day/full day as opposed to an hourly rate? My reasons would start with the fact that most clients are used to this type of billing, so what am I to do if someone wants just 3 hours at say $50/hour and another client later calls who pays a normal/much higher rate? Lose out on income just to be a nuce guy? Using half day/full day puts everyone on much more equal footing.

The other big reason is video production shoots are not like being a plumber, you dont simply pick up ten gigs in a day. Shoots tend to be highly organized affairs that need to happen at a specific day/time and may require a lot of people/resources to come together. A client's shoot may only be 3 hours, but that three hours is likely the only work I'll be able to pick up that day (the rare exception occurs of course but never count on those).

Thoughts?

Daniel Epstein
April 8th, 2015, 10:48 AM
I try not to use the term Half day anymore. Short day might be a better term. Also the definition of what a half day really means is not half of a full day rate. The only time I do hourly rates is for work at my office when they come to me. I will talk total dollars if someone has a budget issue and the length of the commitment might qualify for a discount. As an explanation I say I block out more time than anticipated as production often has variables which don't allow me to schedule anything afterwards until I have finished their production. Of course if you have to explain the caveats to the client it always feels awkward. Anyone asking for a discount and still wants to reserve your time has to realize that you might want to trade yourself out if a better offer comes along.

Josh Bass
April 8th, 2015, 11:05 AM
My mistake...half day here is 0-5 hours, full 5-10. half day/full day should really ONLY apply to labor and not gear fees (assuming you price that stuff separately), and so the difference may not be that great between the two depending on your personal/labor fee and what you bring with you.

practice here is that half day is 66-70% of full day (i do 66%). Im ASSUMING this is to offset the fact that its not a full day and, again, you likely cant pick up another gig that day.

yes if you had a studio/office i could see doing hourly--i dont have a studio/office, but do bill EDITING hourly since i do it at home and can work around other stuff with it.

Gabe Strong
April 8th, 2015, 01:57 PM
I, very rarely even do half day rates anymore. If I am hired for a 'half day' and
then another potential client comes along who wants to hire me for that day,
it's not like I can fit them in around the 'half day' from the previous client. Basically
my day rate is what it is. I too will get the "That seems awful expensive for 3 hours
of shooting." quite a bit. And a doctor, lawyer, real estate agent, plumber, mechanic,
and many other people cost lots of money too. 'If I'm too expensive for you, maybe
you'd be better off hiring Uncle Bob to do it for $50.' I dunno, I'm kind of over the
'negotiating'. You can hire me or decide I'm too expensive but I'm not going to
'cut you a deal' and have you 'make it up to me next time' or with 'volume work'.
The rate is what it is so that I can actually stay in business and not have to close up
shop.

Josh Bass
April 8th, 2015, 02:10 PM
i still do half days cause i am not in demand enough to be one of those guys who doesnt do them.

i will still negotiate when i can--often unfeasible cause im renting much of the gear and THOSE folks wont negotiate so i cant either. most freelancers around here will "work with you on the rate" up to a point--some money better than no money.

what Im getting at more here is the WHY of us not doing hourly.

Shaun Roemich
April 8th, 2015, 02:17 PM
When people ask me about hourly for shooting I tell them "Frankly, I won't get out of bed for less than $xxx. This is what I do for a living and day rates and half day rates have worked for me for 17 years."

If they insist on hourly, there are lots of options around here and I have no interest in a race to the bottom.

Josh Bass
April 8th, 2015, 02:31 PM
so far here Im seeing a lot of anger/annoyance, but no calm explanation that one might offer someone who doesnt know any better as to why we dont work hourly. there must be a reason the industry evolved to be this way.

Andy Wilkinson
April 8th, 2015, 02:48 PM
Ha!

Had this very conversation (yet again...) today with a high-tech client in Cambridge that I'm currently producing a film for. They announced that they now want me to shoot an (additional) "short 5-minute interview" with a Professor who helped develop some of the technology that the film is about - and asked me what that would add to the (already agreed) schedule cost I've submitted. This would be in a different location and on a different day to the locations/days I'm already contracted to do.

The 1-day shooting day rate was my reply...."But it's only a quick 5-minute interview" came the instant response back...

Then followed a period of me explaining that nothing is ever just "5-minutes". I'd have to prep my gear (clear cards, battery charge/checks etc.), arrive on location (driving to and parking is a nightmare where the University department is in Cambridge's congested historical centre). Then, I know from bitter experience, we'll be no doubt waiting around for a while for this guy to become available/get off the phone/get out of some meeting (he's world class in his field - so being filmed by me will be very low down on his daily priorities...).

Once he's in my sights, I'll have to quickly shoot in some (likely) non-ideal, cramped, location whilst making sure I get him relaxed enough/looking good/sounding great to deliver what's needed before he has to rush off somewhere. Then break down all the kit, lug it to my (no doubt distantly parked) car and get back to the studio to off-load footage and back it up...and of course, critically, as I explained to my client, I cannot risk booking any other client filming that day as this could all take "a little longer than 5-minutes".

Realistic door to door for this "5-minute interview" is going to be several hours, assuming no hic-ups - but who knows, these things can take the best part of the day. I've had a CEO of a multinational keep me waiting six hours after the planned filming slot before I could film him. Frustrating, but knowing I'm getting paid for a full day makes it perfectly bearable :-)

Editing day rate time I'll split into half-days. I can instantly switch from one client project to another with a few mouse clicks. When I'm in my studio I'm in 100% control of what happens and when - well, usually! But filming is a completely different animal. I'm rarely in total control in the kind of corporate film environments I do. So, filming is 1-day minimum whether it's 5-minutes or 10 hours. Take it or leave it.

They have agreed my logic - even the sales guy in the meeting ended up on my side and helped persuade the Managing Director - once they understood the reasons as explained above - so now it's on the schedule/will be invoiced...enough said.

I don't normally comment on any details of my business practices/methods etc. on public forums - but I hope this anecdote is useful to you and the discussion.

Shaun Roemich
April 8th, 2015, 04:54 PM
so far here Im seeing a lot of anger/annoyance

No anger or annoyance in my response at all - I'm 17 years in as a working pro, have nothing to prove and don't need anything for my reel and would rather have the day off than not make enough money to compensate myself for a client who, if they are balking at my half day rate, is likely to turn into a miser.

In fact, I didn't work hourly even when I was starting out.

One doesn't ask their dentist to work at a discount, I expect the same respect. I went to school (granted, not anything as time consuming or expensive as dental college...) and I've spent 17 years updating my skills and putting them to use.

I may have an inflated sense of self but I'm good at what I do and I'd like to get compensated for it.

Don Bloom
April 8th, 2015, 06:28 PM
I agree with Shaun. However I would explain it to clients like this.

OK so you only need me for 2 hours, so first I have to drive there, then load-in gear, set up gear, shoot the 2 hours, strike and load-out gear and drive back to my office to edit so here's what I'll do for you. I'll charge you for a 1/2 day rate which is all inclusive and covers you for the entire time. That way you're covered just in case we add some interviews or some take longer or some don't get started on time, you're not being rushed or pressured.

All the while I gave a big smile and made it sound like I was doing them a favor. Hell 5 hours was my half day time anyway so I wasn't losing anything and frankly neither were they. Unless you're shooting a stand up run N gun news interview which I know Shaun has done, NOTHING takes 5 minutes and if I'm going to drive 40 miles thru Chicago rush hour traffic, put out $40 or $50 to park (until I get reimbursed) haul my gear into a downtown Chicago hotel etc etc etc, I'm damn well gonna get paid and it won't be for 2 hours.

A logical reasonable explanation will work no matter what kind of work you're doing be it corp or social but keep it simple and halfway real!

Mike Watson
April 8th, 2015, 10:19 PM
so far here Im seeing a lot of anger/annoyance, but no calm explanation that one might offer someone who doesnt know any better as to why we dont work hourly. there must be a reason the industry evolved to be this way.
1) Don't become one of the angry/annoyed guys.

2) I do half day/full day because in my experience, drive time, unload time, setup time, shoot time, and strike time and more drive time can rarely be done such that it would be advantageous to do it by the hour. Furthermore, I like to do a good job for my clients, and have neither them nor I worrying about money. It's my experience that when we need to do a shot one more time and we're going to click over into another hour / half-hour / quarter-hour, the client is looking at their watch and thinking... is this *really* worth another $125? I don't want them thinking that. I want them (and me) thinking... is this the absolute best this shot can be? And if they are watching the dollars fall from their wallet, they won't be thinking that.

3) In 10 years of freelancing, I don't think I've ever had anyone really protest. I've had some people question it, and I've explained it, but... every industry has it's weird stuff, and this is ours. ;-)

Roger Van Duyn
April 9th, 2015, 05:27 AM
i still do half days cause i am not in demand enough to be one of those guys who doesnt do them.

i will still negotiate when i can--often unfeasible cause im renting much of the gear and THOSE folks wont negotiate so i cant either. most freelancers around here will "work with you on the rate" up to a point--some money better than no money.

what Im getting at more here is the WHY of us not doing hourly.

Hi Josh.

I've been getting some quick and easy turn over the footage local shoots ( or a quick still photography session) lately that require minimal gear such as single camera, so I changed my website rates section to try to get more of them. Previously, I only had half day, full day, and multiple day rates. Now I have a cheap one hour and two hour option, but it is limited to jobs within 20 miles of my home.

Now these are just very basic jobs for documentation purposes mostly. The footage will probably never even be watched, but it's for "cover your butt" purposes. For instance, a property owner's association meeting where they want a record of who said what or a construction project wanting visual documentation that environmental regs are being met ( sewer openings and man holes covered to prevent run-off to lakes, warning signs in place etc.

If I need to bring field mixer, lights etc. then the 5 hour minimum would apply even for a local job because of the time (and effort) loading, lugging, set-up, pack-up of the gear.

But as I've gotten older, jobs that really are quick and easy, especially when it comes to getting paid decent money quick and easy, often on the spot, with no hassles have become my favorites. Good clients that give repeat work understand prices are based on the amount of gear plus the amount/difficulty of the job.

I've gotten a couple of larger jobs from clients who admitted they were testing the waters with a small job first.

Shaun Roemich
April 9th, 2015, 10:00 AM
Addendum: if I did the sort of work that Roger discusses above, I would consider a shorter timeframe, ESPECIALLY if I could control when in the day I was to go do the work - a good friend of mine is a professional photographer who photographs outdoor billboards for proof of performance for the ad company's clients. Within a time span, she can go when she can fit it in and they get a moderate break on what would be her "normal" pricing.

I only do full service work these days and 95% of what I do is talking head interviews for the past number of years. I would hate for a client to be watching the clock as we start to get someone who was stiff in the beginning of an interview to loosen up and become loquacious. I choose to control the type of work I do and I choose to work with people who respect what I bring to a production, not that I own a camera (which I no longer do... for now) and can point it in the right direction.

Gabe Strong
April 10th, 2015, 12:16 AM
No anger here either, it is what it is and it's not worth being angry over. I just politely
decline the 'hourly' jobs. I'm even polite enough to tell those who tell me they are sorry,
that they really like my work but they can get it from someone else MUCH cheaper.....
'I'm sure he (or she) will do a fine job. Good luck!'

A LOT of people have touched on it in the above answers. Just to really emphasize it though.....

People who have no clue about video production will ALWAY severely underestimate the
amount of time it will take you to do something.

They will say....'It's only a two hour shoot'. They don't take into account, the time it
takes you to pack up camera, tripods, lights, audio mixer, mics, batteries, memory cards,
green screen, sliders, C-stands or any other grip equipment, and get it into your car.
Then the drive to the location. Now you need to pack all the gear in, sometimes taking
multiple trips in and out from the car. Next you get to set up all the gear. And FINALLY
you are to the shoot time. After the shoot time you get to break all the gear down, and
then pack it safely and transport it back to your car. Next you drive home.
And finally you get to get it all back into your edit bay. Then, most likely, you need to back
up the footage (as most things are shot on memory cards these days.) And on edit jobs, we
also have all the ingest, editing, color correction, music scoring, compression and output to
multiple formats to deal with. But even assuming you are talking a straight shoot only job, I
have learned, that in about 0.001% of the cases, is the time the client gives you, the
actual time it takes to do a job. They of course want to sell how 'easy and quick' it will
be. It is never as easy or quick as they say. Can you tell a client this straight up?
Probably not. So instead you just charge your rate and some pay it and some don't.
The most I might do is tell the client:

"I know you think it will only take 2 hours, but I have done about 4000 of these shoots and
I have never once had one actually take 2 hours. So instead of charging you for the two hours,
and then leaving 5 minutes into the interview, I am actually protecting your investment and making
sure, that when the CEO makes us wait for 45 minutes, that you still get the video you are paying me for."

But honestly, I often don't even go that far unless I already have a good relationship with the client.
Because if it is a new client that is trying to negotiate with me on price, then he doesn't really value
video production all that much anyways. He sees it as a commodity that he is trying to get
for the lowest possible price, instead of looking at value. As others have said, I'm just not into
competing on price. Either my price is fair for what I offer, or it isn't. And I have learned that it is
usually better to not even work with certain types of clients. You know, the ones that expect a
Hollywood feature on a $500 budget and also expect you to report to a 10 person committee,
each of whom will have 2 rounds of edits for you to do (and at least four of the members will have
edits which will directly contradict another committee member's edits).

I hear you on how it's hard to stick to your guns when you aren't getting work.
When I started my business, it was from sheer panic as I had lost a staff job and
had no way to pay the bills. I was lucky to even make $500 the first month and
there were some months that were even worse. That's when I learned about
keeping expenses to a bare minimum in your life (lucky for me, I already leaned towards
this lifestyle and had never took out student loans or had any credit cards and I drove an old beater).
But it took quite a few years of struggling and even now there are some tough months.
I learned to not put all my eggs in one basket (I lost every single TV commercial client
when the economy crashed in 2009.) I learned to do anything and everything related to
video....weddings, TV spots, promo videos, graduations, dance performances, sports
highlights and game films, on air announcing for sports, even taught myself how to
make a basic website so I could offer clients without a site a place to put the nice
new video I made them. I don't think there is any easy way in this business. (if there
was, everyone would be successful at it) and frankly, a lot of it is probably luck.
But one thing I do know......there are times you need to stick to your price. Because
the logical conclusion of giving away more and more services, cheaper and cheaper
to the clients as they 'negotiate'.........is doing a ton of work for nothing.

Josh Bass
April 10th, 2015, 12:31 AM
Thanks guys. a slew of responses apparently came in at some point that I missed. I will try using these next time I have to gently educate someone as to why hourly is not the way I work.

One point of contention I have is that many here seem to include time loading gear into and out of car at the beginning of the day, driving to and from location, to billable time. Freelancers around here (and again, maybe it's a local custom) have told me you only charge "portal to portal" (i.e. clock starts when I leave home ends when I return) on commutes/drive times over a certain length (say an hour in regular traffic). Otherwise job clock starts at arrival time on location and "tail lights" from location.

Gabe Strong
April 10th, 2015, 01:02 AM
Josh, one of the nice things about being freelance....is that you are your own
boss. Other people telling you that 'you only charge once you start driving'
doesn't have to mean anything to you, because you get to decide what you
charge. I am just explaining why I (and many others) do day rate instead of
hourly. There are a lot of things that happen when you run your own business
that are 'work' that some may not want you to charge for. Doing up invoices,
keeping track of expenses, taxes, packing up gear into the car, clearing memory
cards and backing them up, archiving video longterm, talking with clients on
the phone, researching and writing up the infamous 'RFP' or 'bid', and many other tasks
fall in this category. One reason for a 'day rate' is that you need to make a certain amount
of money in a week, or month, or year, to stay into business. Some tasks like
paperwork, or packing up your car, may not be something clients want to pay you for.
Yet they have to be done. So now you are doing 'unpaid work'. You have to make
it up somewhere. And if you allow your time to be 'nickel and dime'd' away from
you so that you are only being paid for time that the client wants to pay you for....
you go out of business really easily. Remember, as a small business owner/freelancer
you have to pay for your own health insurance, retirement, you pay double the
social security (employers portion and employees) and many other expenses.
These are not things that people who are 'salaried' employees think of.
They offer you '$150 for a two hour shoot' and think you should jump at it, because
after all, it is '$75 an hour, and I'd LOVE to make that!'

I mean could I work hourly? Yeah, I could only charge you once I get to the
job site and start shooting and I could quit charging as soon as the shoot is
done. I won't charge you for all the work that I HAVE to do to get ready for
the shoot. My new hourly rate is now $1500 an hour :) The money has
to come from somewhere or a business won't stay a business for very long.
Basically, what I am saying, is maybe the freelancers that are telling you
that charges don't start until they get to the job site.....maybe they are
charging a much higher hourly, half day, or day rate than you.....however
they choose to break it down.

Josh Bass
April 10th, 2015, 01:33 AM
Interesting. Thanks.

Gabe Strong
April 10th, 2015, 03:54 AM
I wish you tons of luck. And you got to do what you got to
do. When you need money for groceries, maybe you accept
that lowball offer. There was one time in my life where I took
a $250 shoot and edit job because I was desperate.
I always try to get something in return when I go that low.
What I would ask for (because after all if you take a lowball
job, you are usually pretty hard up for the money) would be
for immediate payment, no waiting for 30 days or whatever.
And I also always give them an invoice with my normal
charge and write in a discount. Say they got the job for $250.
I'd write the invoice for $2000 and give them a 'early pay' discount
of say $500 and a 'trial' discount of $500 and whatever else I need
to make up as a discount to make it work. That way they don't expect
that price next time or go telling other places that you only charge
$250 for a shoot and edit. Because when you got to eat that's one
thing. But you do not want to normally take those jobs.

Josh Bass
April 10th, 2015, 05:52 AM
As I said, everyone around here is willing to compromise up to a point (I'm talking like taking around 25% off, max, NOT 90%), or of course if times are tough like you say they'll go farther and do a movie or reality show or something for a month for 1/3 of their normal rate. I don't have as much compromise room 'cause I often have to rent the cam or something. So those are easy choices.

I don't do it much and I haven't done anything super lowball in a long while.

Ryan Douthit
April 10th, 2015, 09:39 AM
I quote flat rates that are based loosely on a day rate minimum.

For most of my jobs I calculate a minimum based on my average day rate and then go up from there, adding travel costs on top. I then offer the client a flat rate without a breakout. I find that once you start giving too much specific information they start to pick quotes apart. "You want a web series of 52 episodes? That will be $2000 per episode. I'll do what I need to do to make it look like you want. But it's $2,000 per." Or, "Three days in the desert, with three days editing. Okay. $3500. Final delivered within two weeks after the shoot." (of course I deliver it within 7 days). If you don't give them something they can pick apart, they won't. (note: these aren't specific prices, just examples.)

What I go through to get a shoot done at that point is my call. Sometimes I'll even stay longer to get what I need for the production without adding it to the clients bill. I've also staged shots days after the official shoot because I felt that some B-Roll would help the story. The only time I add more cost to a clients bill is when they specifically ask for something that is outside the original proposal. My clients seem to expect and appreciate that. So far no one has abused it. I presume that I also get very little pushback on my quotes because of it.

Josh Bass
April 10th, 2015, 03:15 PM
Yes, I try to do that too, as opposed to x for me, x for the camera, x for audio. But often they see the total and say "that's kinda high considering it's only a 3-hour shoot" (nope, no it isn't, it's actually low for this market, but thanks for playing).

Kevin McRoberts
April 11th, 2015, 09:20 AM
I don't know, I've tried just about everything to se what works. A few thoughts, some echoing others' contributions:

- Let's say you take an hourly job... 2 hours, for instance, and it really will be only 2 hours. Those 2 hours will invariably be scheduled from, say, 11am-1pm, making it nearly impossible to book any other location work that day.

- Hourly work can hamper creativity, excellence, and efficiency. On one side, a client may rush a shoot - not because of any actual need, but because they don't want to cough up for another hour or two wage correcting lighting issues (or lighting at all) or shooting enough B-roll to effectively edit the thing. On the other side, human nature on any hourly wage is to pad time, sometimes not working very efficiently, sometimes just to get in a "minimum" expected paycheck.

My now largest client used to invoice hourly. Not only weren't they able to predict cash flow, but jobs (all following a fairly regular formula) were taking 7-8 hours to complete. When they switched to a day rate model, not only did they know how much they'd have to pay each month based on jobs booked, but they also saw the average shoot time cut nearly in half... and done better, at that.

- One compromise strategy I've seen is to charge hourly, yet have a minimum number of billable hours per job (even plumbers sometimes do this)... so you may have a $150/hr rate, with a minimum of 2 hours billable... and then you can even incentivize the day rate by having it reduced from what 10 total hours would be.

- Equipment rates are separate, and are never hourly, or even halved. If it has to work at all that day, it's not going to be rented out anywhere else... and if I have to rent it, it's never going to be on an hourly rate.

Perhaps I have a weakness in that I just like to work, and if I don't have anything else booked, I'll take the $250 shoot/edit jobs like Gabe mentions - they're simple and low-stress, and its damn better money than a local broadcast photog makes. Heck, I'll do local PA work.

Robert Turchick
April 11th, 2015, 10:00 AM
I quote half day/day rates on most jobs. For similar reasons to several here. If I go to a shoot that's only an hour long, I still have loading, commute, setup, shoot, teardown, commute, transfer footage. There is no such thing as a one hour shoot. I also bring most every toy and gadget with me to every shoot. The only special requests that I charge more for are jib and some weird device that makes a camera go even higher ;)
In my studio, I will charge hourly. Everything is pretty much setup and my commute is 25 feet! But my hourly is more expensive because now I'm paying utilities and wear and tear on the facility. (painting the cyc wall, seamless paper, coffee/soda/water) It all adds up!
If clients don't get it, I explain I'd be more than happy to charge hourly for location shooting but the half day/day rate will save them money as I charge portal to portal hourly.
I pass on gigs where the expectation is to get charged for one hour because that was the length of the program.
And if you look at even a shoot where I need to be filming for two hours, half hour of travel on either end (every location seems to take a half hour to get to here!) plus half hour setup/half hour teardown… I'm at 4 hours which is a half day…not including the footage transfer which if they book the half day I throw in.
On commuting…it's not just gas you pay for…it's insurance, the maintenance and car payment too. Your hourly wage starts sinking pretty quickly when you get real about all your expenses.

Josh Bass
April 11th, 2015, 02:37 PM
more food for thought, thanks. i always figured if I DID do hourly it would be high enough to make my two hour minimum work out to the half day rate i would have charged anyway, which makes it way more expensive when we inevitably go into a 3rd or 4th hour.

Joshua Reafsnyder
May 5th, 2015, 11:51 AM
Interesting conversation. I am just starting out, and still figuring it out myself. I also have a full time job, and my video work at the moment is after work or on the weekends, so I try to be flexible with billing since the client has to be flexible with the shooting schedule (hence charging an hourly rate because I might shoot a couple hours after work one day, then a couple hours after work another day).

I have a day rate and an hourly rate, but do not do a half day rate. If it is less than 4-5 hours I charge the hourly rate. If it is more I charge the day rate. The day rate is a discount to the client after about 6 hours, so really it works in their favor. I bill out editing and production as different line items. I also charge fees for all of my equipment (fee does not change based on length of the day), which I have broken down into packages ie my BMPCC package includes the camera, batteries, Lenses, tripod, anything I would need for that camera.

Much like Josh Bass was saying, I dont charge travel for local jobs. But I work out of my house, and I live in a very small town, and have almost no jobs in my immediate area. It is about 1hr to Sacramento with a lot of sizable communities within a hours drive. So I dont charge if it is with in about 30-45 min of my house. Anything beyond that I charge 1/2 my hourly rate for travel.

Still fairly new and working on getting more film business, so I have been working on tweaking everything a lot, including figuring out the best way to bill. This has been the structure I have seem to land on, since starting to focus more on corporate work rather than weddings and other misc consumer work. It seems to be working, and I like it. It has made doing quotes a lot easier, having a standard pricing sheet, and knowing what how much I need to make an hour to make it worth my time.

With the consumer/wedding side it was a struggle to come up with "packages" that were cheap enough to entice clients, but still make something better than minimum wage. Anyhow I have been failing at that side (consumer) so far, the jobs I did get I ended up way underbidding, and hating how little I was getting paid compared to the time I was giving up away from my family. I have started to shift my focus towards corporate work, and have applied the hourly/day pricing structure to both and am much happier. Most consumer clients see my prices and I dont hear from them again, but corporate clients are willing to pay for what it actually takes to make a movie, and are honestly usually less stressful to work with.

Al Bergstein
May 7th, 2015, 09:15 AM
Not much to add, Robert Turchick seemed to be about right, as are most of you. In my area, which is more remote from a city, I charge half and day rates, only because if I can get out of the house by 8 and back by 12, it's a half day, if it will take me longer, it's a day rate. But again, these are discounts for the customer, because quoting hourly is always more expensive. Travel, setup tear down. Being able to quote one price is good and simple.

Paul R Johnson
May 7th, 2015, 09:36 AM
I never, ever talk hours. Short day, long day or extra long day with a quoted price for each, but no explanation of what the long day actually is. works for me.

In the UK, hourly quotes also cause grief with the tax authorities making it very simple for them to decide you are an employee!

Mark Ahrens
May 8th, 2015, 06:00 AM
The half day / full day paradigm, in my mind, shifts the responsibility on the client to organize the shoot.
I will sometimes shoot 3 half hour interviews on 3 different days; sometimes i shoot 3 interviews in one location one after the other. Obviously, they spend less when they schedule efficiently.

Steven Davis
May 8th, 2015, 08:09 AM
Ha!

Had this very conversation (yet again...) today with a high-tech client in Cambridge that I'm currently producing a film for. They announced that they now want me to shoot an (additional) "short 5-minute interview" with a Professor who helped develop some of the technology that the film is about - and asked me what that would add to the (already agreed) schedule cost I've submitted. This would be in a different location and on a different day to the locations/days I'm already contracted to do.

The 1-day shooting day rate was my reply...."But it's only a quick 5-minute interview" came the instant response back...

Then followed a period of me explaining that nothing is ever just "5-minutes". I'd have to prep my gear (clear cards, battery charge/checks etc.), arrive on location (driving to and parking is a nightmare where the University department is in Cambridge's congested historical centre). Then, I know from bitter experience, we'll be no doubt waiting around for a while for this guy to become available/get off the phone/get out of some meeting (he's world class in his field - so being filmed by me will be very low down on his daily priorities...).

Once he's in my sights, I'll have to quickly shoot in some (likely) non-ideal, cramped, location whilst making sure I get him relaxed enough/looking good/sounding great to deliver what's needed before he has to rush off somewhere. Then break down all the kit, lug it to my (no doubt distantly parked) car and get back to the studio to off-load footage and back it up...and of course, critically, as I explained to my client, I cannot risk booking any other client filming that day as this could all take "a little longer than 5-minutes".

Realistic door to door for this "5-minute interview" is going to be several hours, assuming no hic-ups - but who knows, these things can take the best part of the day. I've had a CEO of a multinational keep me waiting six hours after the planned filming slot before I could film him. Frustrating, but knowing I'm getting paid for a full day makes it perfectly bearable :-)

Editing day rate time I'll split into half-days. I can instantly switch from one client project to another with a few mouse clicks. When I'm in my studio I'm in 100% control of what happens and when - well, usually! But filming is a completely different animal. I'm rarely in total control in the kind of corporate film environments I do. So, filming is 1-day minimum whether it's 5-minutes or 10 hours. Take it or leave it.

They have agreed my logic - even the sales guy in the meeting ended up on my side and helped persuade the Managing Director - once they understood the reasons as explained above - so now it's on the schedule/will be invoiced...enough said.

I don't normally comment on any details of my business practices/methods etc. on public forums - but I hope this anecdote is useful to you and the discussion.


Hey Andy,

That was very helpful. I'm currently putting together my corporate/commercial product line. Everything from quotes,agreements, pricing. Thanks.

Andy Wilkinson
May 8th, 2015, 09:17 AM
Thanks. Glad it helped someone!

I just got back from filming in Scotland this week (film involves a very well know whisky company - I can't say more because of client confidentiality). This job took me a full day to drive up there with all my gear from my base (near Cambridge, in the south-east of England) and another full day to drive back when filming was completed.

Client is totally happy about the fact that 2 days will be added to the invoice (at my full filming/travel day rate) when my bill gets submitted because of this travelling time.

They are (of course) also paying my mileage rate (a not inconsiderable sum...several hundred pounds in view of the distances involved at the UK's HMRC specified 0.45p/mile) and are paying for my hotel stay (which was superb - they booked it for me as they use it regularly and get a corporate rate) plus all my meals etc. whilst up in Scotland.

It was a fun job to do and I start the editing work on Monday :-)