View Full Version : key question about 24p vs. 60p


Nicholas Natteau
December 30th, 2005, 09:40 AM
I'm planning to shoot a documentary film with the HVX200 at 1280x720 and I have a very important question to ask about 24p vs. 60p.

I saw the clips posted by Kako Ito. They all look awesome BTW.

But I notice that 60p is a lot smoother than 24p for anything involving motion, less strobic looking.

Is there any way to get rid of the strobe like look you get with 24p when shooting people or machines in motion?

In one of Kako's 24p clips showing a car paused at an intersection with other cars driving by, the movement of the cars traveling appears strobe-like, not smooth.

Is there any way to avoid this in 24p? Or will all movement in 24p inevitably have that strobelike look?

Would increasing the shutter speed eliminate the strobe like look of 24p or would it be better to shoot in 60p if you plan to shoot people / machines in motion???

Thank you very much in advance to anyone who can enlighten me here.

- Nicholas

Ron Evans
December 30th, 2005, 11:03 AM
That is the THE problem with 24p. The frame rate is not fast enough for anything but slow motion across the field of view. Lots and lots of film information if you search that gives shooting angles and motion information to limit the effects of slow frame rate of 24fps film that mostly apply to the video 24p. Shoot at a high frame rate then apply whatever effects you want after but at least you will have a clear image to work with. To me the real value of the HVX200 is the fact it can shoot at 60P. You can always make it strobe if you really want to emulate the technical limitations of the old film technology !!!

Ron Evans

Kenn Christenson
December 30th, 2005, 11:19 AM
Your frame rate will also depend on how your project will be displayed. If you're going for a video-only release then 60P or 30P (if you want more of a film look) will be just fine. If you plan on a filmout then 24P is a must. Also, if you're planning on international distribution 24P will give you a much better looking conversion for PAL conutries as it will not need the interpolation that 60P and 30P will require.

James Darren
December 30th, 2005, 11:33 AM
If you shoot 60p, how do you play back that on your TV at normal speed? Doesn't a TV play at 24p or 30p? Would you need to speed up the 60p signal?

Nicholas Natteau
December 30th, 2005, 01:09 PM
Dear Ron and Kenn,

Thank you both for your input. Kenn, do you mean that if I were to go with 24p and I had to shoot motion - for example cars driving at 65Mph down a freeway, that I should increase the shutter speed to say 125? 250? 500????

Suppose I wanted to shoot a freeway scene at night at 24P? That would look very strobic, so would it be then better to shoot at 60P, then import that footage into a 24p project and render?

Thanks for any further feedback you can give me.

James, in answer to your question, I believe TV frame rate in North America is always 29.97 per second and in Europe and everywhere else, 25 FPS.

Barry Green
December 30th, 2005, 01:42 PM
If you shoot 60p, how do you play back that on your TV at normal speed? Doesn't a TV play at 24p or 30p? Would you need to speed up the 60p signal?
No, not at all. Traditional interlaced TVs, like standard-def TVs, play at 60 interlaced fields per second. The 60P signal would be converted on a field-for-frame basis, so 60p becomes 60i.

Newer high-def TVs can play 24p or 30p or 60p, so on those it's a direct playback situation. The ATSC ensconced three broadcast methods for 720p, being 720/24p, 720/30p, and 720/60p. So any TV that claims to be ATSC-compatible has to support all those playback rates.

Ron Evans
December 30th, 2005, 04:40 PM
Nicholas
CHanging shutter speed will change how sharp the image is but will not have any effect on the 24p stutter which is just too slow for fast motion. You will get a nice sharp, strobing image. You are correct that frame rate in NA is roughly 30 and most of the rest of the world is 25 but in all these cases the TV is intended to be interlaced ( 60 for NA and 50 in PAL land, initial TV's taking advantage of the mains AC electricity frequency, which just brings it above the flicker rate for the eye brain to perceive as smooth motion). It really isn't but our brains are convinced its OK, especially with the decay in the CRT phosphors between interlaced fields. For those of us from NA when we visit UK for example the TV's appear to strobe until our brains convince us its OK, for me it takes two or three days. The 60 to 50 cycles is noticable. With modern electronics and progressive displays with high refresh rates it is possible to solve all these problems as long as we don't try and reproduce the past!!!!

Ron Evans

Bob Grant
December 30th, 2005, 05:16 PM
To answer the question regarding shooting for slo mo.
Use the fastest frame rate possible and yes use faster shutter speeds. The shutter speed should roughly match the target not the shooting frame rate. If not the MB becomes too much, it doesn't match the new speed of the clip.
Same goes for footage that you know will need stabilisation in post, nothing looks wieder than motion blur trails that don't match the motion.

William Hohauser
December 30th, 2005, 10:22 PM
I also noticed the strobe on the 1080/24p clips, however the clip labled 1080/24pa seemed smooth. This might be because there wasn't as much gross motion. This was seen thru FCP, the clips just dropped in to the sequence and played without rendering. I went frame by frame and the strobe is very clear and very interlaced in the 24p clip. Does anyone have an answer for why this is so?

Waiting to see 720/24p clips.

Kaku Ito
December 30th, 2005, 11:18 PM
I also noticed the strobe on the 1080/24p clips, however the clip labled 1080/24pa seemed smooth. This might be because there wasn't as much gross motion. This was seen thru FCP, the clips just dropped in to the sequence and played without rendering. I went frame by frame and the strobe is very clear and very interlaced in the 24p clip. Does anyone have an answer for why this is so?

Waiting to see 720/24p clips.

24pa is made for watching 24 frame on 60i, 24p should be actually treated and edit in the 24p timeline.

William Hohauser
December 31st, 2005, 01:34 PM
That makes sense. Thanks for the answer. And thanks for the clips.

I tried to import it into a 24p timeline but they all required rendering. The standard DVCPro HD timeline was the only one that accepted the clip straight. Is there a FCP preset sequence setting made for the 1080/24p clips? I only see 720/24p presets.

Danny Dale
December 31st, 2005, 02:32 PM
I tried to import it into a 24p timeline but they all required rendering. The standard DVCPro HD timeline was the only one that accepted the clip straight. Is there a FCP preset sequence setting made for the 1080/24p clips? I only see 720/24p presets.

was wondering about the same thing... does 5.0.4 have presets for 1080 24P/30P?

Andrae Palmer
December 31st, 2005, 06:17 PM
I was wondering the same thing as the above posters. When I play the clips that Kaku uploaded I noticed alot of interlacing which was surprising considering that I was expecting deinterlaced frames for 1080p24. I'm using FCP 5.0.4 and I don't see a preset for DVCPRO HD 1080p24. How do I play these clips back properly in FCP?

Craig Seeman
December 31st, 2005, 08:41 PM
What I'm seeing is that the 1080p24 clips are in 29.97 fps so they have pulldown added. The clips are Interlaced Upper field first. One would have to reverse telecine them back to 24p (23.98). This is much like the 24p in the DVX100 series.

The 60p clips are at 59.94 fps and are progressive.

In FCP you can create a custom preset. Not sure if that would preclude rendering though

Nicholas Natteau
January 1st, 2006, 01:01 AM
Don and everyone else, thank you very much for your continued feedback.

Now, suppose I were shooting a nature documentary about how cheetahs hunt their prey for example: we're talking about a lot of fast motion here.

What would would be the minimum shutter speed I would need in broad daylight if I wanted to shoot at 24p?

Or would I be much better off shooting at 60p???

If I did go with 60p, would it be a lot harder to transfer to film than 24p???

I guess what I am not understanding is that when you go to the cinema and watch a movie, you don't see the strobing that you get with 24p "filmlike" video. Is that because you're looking at genuine film (16mm/35mm/70mm) shot at the right shutter speed?

Will the 24p look always inevitably look stuttery/strobic?

Am I understanding it correctly then, that all motion shot at 24p will look strobic, not smooth. If so, then how fast a shutter speed does it take to get rid of the strobe-like quality of 24p????

Sorry for all these questions, but choosing the right recording mode will be a crucial decision for me before I begin shooting.

Thank you in advance,

- Nicholas

Ron Evans
January 1st, 2006, 12:46 PM
There is a difference between what you may be calling strobing and stuttering. Capturing fast motion at 24fps is just not fast enough, period. It will always stutter but if this is played back so that ones eyes see greater than 50flashes per second it will not strobe( if I am understanding you correctly). In the movie theatre the projector has 2 or more blades rotating in front of the lamp and flashes the picture several times before moving on to the next frame. In this way the film does not strobe but it does still stutter because film shot at 24fps is not fast enough ( whatever the shutter speed, to create smooth motion). Think of a lab setup with 24 equally spaced marks across the frame and a ball rolling across the scene in one sec. The film will take 24 frames one at each one of the marks. When played back at 24fps to the observer the ball will jump between each of the marks NOT roll. This is the stutter of film that cannot be removed but can be masked. To make the ball appear to roll frames have to be taken at a rate that matches the human eye brain perception of smooth motion ( above about 50cycles per sec) OR shoot the ball at an angle so that each frame of the ball overlaps to a great extent the previous frame. The eye is again fooled. Which is why most old films had any fast motion at an angle to the field of view. OR the film is shot at high speed ( not 24fps, maybe 120fps ) and then slowed down to get those slow motion crash scenes popular today!!!!!. As I mentioned in an earlier post there is lots of film information governing these angles for different speeds etc.
IF you are shooting wild life shoot at 60p you can always make it look the way you want in post but at least you will get a nice clean sharp original video. You will need to calculated distances moved across the frame when animals are moving at various speeds to decide what other settings you will need to use. That is, how fast does the shutter speed have to be to just freeze the image at 60P. Remember even at 60P the image is still stuttering it just happens to be above the rate at which we humans care about, but if each of these frames is blurred because the shutter speed is too slow the whole image of the moving animal will appear muddy and out of focus compared to the backround. This is assuming the you want the whole image to be sharp.
Ron Evans