Frank Granovski
March 9th, 2003, 08:21 PM
Allan writes:
I went to Bic Camera store located in a major commercial area in Tokyo today and was pleasantly surprised to finally see a display unit of the HD1. The display unit is connected to a 50V Pioneer plasma vision HDTV. They were showing (through a D-VHS) what was supposed to be sample footages taken using this cam. It was pretty impressive but certainly not as jaw-dropping as broadcast quality HD. The seller and I spent the next 30 minutes playing with the cam. Here are my impressions.
First, JPY348,000 + 44,000) + 5% tax, I felt is quite expensive, but what the heck, I?m not planning to buy anyway. I was just curious as hell on how superior this new format is compared to my Optura 100MC.
Second, the cam has 52mm filter thread, but typically JVC, the glass part is so much smaller, certainly smaller than those of GL2 and VX2000.
Third, although the camera is HD, raw video output is mediocre. Colors are washed out and video is simply not as clear and crisp (NOT EVEN CLOSE) as the sample footage prepared by Victor Japan. The seller and I did all possible adjustments both on the HDTV and the cam to improve color and clarity or at least, make it as close as possible to the sample. Yep, tons of manual options are available. All our attempts were fruitless. Now, I?m no expert at all (but the seller seems to know quite enough) but I have played with practically all cam models that came out since 2001 in that VERY bright and beautifully lighted store and I have seen and tested real good ones and real crappy ones. Actually, I took some of the best indoor shots of my daughter in that store?s toy section. But I was not impressed at all with the HD1's raw video as viewed on the 50V plasma vision.. BTW, video as seen on the LCD looks good enough (but that is not the point isn?t it). Using standard 21? NTSC, colors are fine? BUT Third, this cam must be used with a HDTV. I previously thought that with higher resolution signal, HD1?s video should look better than MiniDV even on standard TV. Guess what, HD video on standard NTSC is very very very noisy. Lines are all too jagged. To some people, they might consider the quality to be unviewable. Some views are bordering on being mosaic due to the jagged lines and noise. SD video looked better(than HD) on standard NTSC but still noisy. On the other hand, the cam also has DV mode (4:3) in addition to HD and SD, however, I honestly felt it does not look even as good as my Optura 100MC. Just in case somebody might ask, the cam is connected to the Plasma HDTV through the D terminal. HD1?s terminal is compatible with D1 to D4 signals. The standard TV is connected through the S-video terminal.
I?m not going to pass final judgment on this cam based on 30 minutes of playing with it. On one side, perhaps I simply didn't know enough to bring out a "satisfactory" performance from the cam. On the other hand, I honestly felt raw video was simply not "HD" enough under such good shooting condition. I?m sure Victor Japan used professionals and proper equipment in producing the sample footages. However, I just can?t believe the wide discrepancy in quality between the sample footage and the raw video I saw. I told the seller it looks suspicious and he couldn?t comment at all. As I wrote above, the store is very very well and beautifully lighted. BTW, according to JVCs catalogue, the min. lux requirement of the HD1 is 35 lux! YES, you read it right, it?s not 3.5 lux or 3-5 lux. Are you guys aware of this? Perhaps somebody can tell us the relevance of this value which I think is too (abnormally?) high. The min. lux requirement of the VX2000 I believe is only 4 lux. I tried using the slower shutter speeds (1/15 and 1/30) just in case the store?s lighting was not enough and set white balance manually. Those adjustments improved the quality of video a bit, but certainly not enough. Finally, I suggested to the seller that they should try replacing the 50V Plasma with much smaller 32 or 36 inch HDTV tubes and see the result. I just hope they?ll heed my suggestion. I'll check the store again next week.
On the positive side, I truly liked the rotating grip, the manual zoom ring and the solid feel of the cam. But video quality is most important to me and I was pretty unimpressed with what I saw. One thing I'm convinced of, the HD1 is a start of better things to come in home video.
Allan follows up
First, I'd better mention the various video formats that we have in Japan because it seems they're not exactly the same as what you have in the US.
D1 supports 525i
D2 supports 525i, 525p
D3 supports 525i, 525p, 1125i
D4 supports 525i, 525p, 1125i, 750p
Specs of Jap HD1
DV 525i
SD 525p
HD 750p
Both the HD1 and the Pioneer plasma are D4 capable. The Pioneer plasma has multiple D4 terminals. The D-VHS that played the nice looking sample footages is connected to the same Pioneer plasma through D terminal as well. So it was simply a matter of switching between D-video channels of the same plasma to compare the sample footage and raw video. The difference in video quality was quite apparent.
This was copied from the Camera forum at www.dv.com
Allan has been a member here for almost a year. He has numerous posts in our MX forum. Allan is known as "peping" at www.dv.com :D
I went to Bic Camera store located in a major commercial area in Tokyo today and was pleasantly surprised to finally see a display unit of the HD1. The display unit is connected to a 50V Pioneer plasma vision HDTV. They were showing (through a D-VHS) what was supposed to be sample footages taken using this cam. It was pretty impressive but certainly not as jaw-dropping as broadcast quality HD. The seller and I spent the next 30 minutes playing with the cam. Here are my impressions.
First, JPY348,000 + 44,000) + 5% tax, I felt is quite expensive, but what the heck, I?m not planning to buy anyway. I was just curious as hell on how superior this new format is compared to my Optura 100MC.
Second, the cam has 52mm filter thread, but typically JVC, the glass part is so much smaller, certainly smaller than those of GL2 and VX2000.
Third, although the camera is HD, raw video output is mediocre. Colors are washed out and video is simply not as clear and crisp (NOT EVEN CLOSE) as the sample footage prepared by Victor Japan. The seller and I did all possible adjustments both on the HDTV and the cam to improve color and clarity or at least, make it as close as possible to the sample. Yep, tons of manual options are available. All our attempts were fruitless. Now, I?m no expert at all (but the seller seems to know quite enough) but I have played with practically all cam models that came out since 2001 in that VERY bright and beautifully lighted store and I have seen and tested real good ones and real crappy ones. Actually, I took some of the best indoor shots of my daughter in that store?s toy section. But I was not impressed at all with the HD1's raw video as viewed on the 50V plasma vision.. BTW, video as seen on the LCD looks good enough (but that is not the point isn?t it). Using standard 21? NTSC, colors are fine? BUT Third, this cam must be used with a HDTV. I previously thought that with higher resolution signal, HD1?s video should look better than MiniDV even on standard TV. Guess what, HD video on standard NTSC is very very very noisy. Lines are all too jagged. To some people, they might consider the quality to be unviewable. Some views are bordering on being mosaic due to the jagged lines and noise. SD video looked better(than HD) on standard NTSC but still noisy. On the other hand, the cam also has DV mode (4:3) in addition to HD and SD, however, I honestly felt it does not look even as good as my Optura 100MC. Just in case somebody might ask, the cam is connected to the Plasma HDTV through the D terminal. HD1?s terminal is compatible with D1 to D4 signals. The standard TV is connected through the S-video terminal.
I?m not going to pass final judgment on this cam based on 30 minutes of playing with it. On one side, perhaps I simply didn't know enough to bring out a "satisfactory" performance from the cam. On the other hand, I honestly felt raw video was simply not "HD" enough under such good shooting condition. I?m sure Victor Japan used professionals and proper equipment in producing the sample footages. However, I just can?t believe the wide discrepancy in quality between the sample footage and the raw video I saw. I told the seller it looks suspicious and he couldn?t comment at all. As I wrote above, the store is very very well and beautifully lighted. BTW, according to JVCs catalogue, the min. lux requirement of the HD1 is 35 lux! YES, you read it right, it?s not 3.5 lux or 3-5 lux. Are you guys aware of this? Perhaps somebody can tell us the relevance of this value which I think is too (abnormally?) high. The min. lux requirement of the VX2000 I believe is only 4 lux. I tried using the slower shutter speeds (1/15 and 1/30) just in case the store?s lighting was not enough and set white balance manually. Those adjustments improved the quality of video a bit, but certainly not enough. Finally, I suggested to the seller that they should try replacing the 50V Plasma with much smaller 32 or 36 inch HDTV tubes and see the result. I just hope they?ll heed my suggestion. I'll check the store again next week.
On the positive side, I truly liked the rotating grip, the manual zoom ring and the solid feel of the cam. But video quality is most important to me and I was pretty unimpressed with what I saw. One thing I'm convinced of, the HD1 is a start of better things to come in home video.
Allan follows up
First, I'd better mention the various video formats that we have in Japan because it seems they're not exactly the same as what you have in the US.
D1 supports 525i
D2 supports 525i, 525p
D3 supports 525i, 525p, 1125i
D4 supports 525i, 525p, 1125i, 750p
Specs of Jap HD1
DV 525i
SD 525p
HD 750p
Both the HD1 and the Pioneer plasma are D4 capable. The Pioneer plasma has multiple D4 terminals. The D-VHS that played the nice looking sample footages is connected to the same Pioneer plasma through D terminal as well. So it was simply a matter of switching between D-video channels of the same plasma to compare the sample footage and raw video. The difference in video quality was quite apparent.
This was copied from the Camera forum at www.dv.com
Allan has been a member here for almost a year. He has numerous posts in our MX forum. Allan is known as "peping" at www.dv.com :D