John Vincent
November 30th, 2006, 10:26 AM
The past 7-8 episodes of season three have been nothing less than great, with the fourth (representing a culmination of a part story arc) being breathtaking.
Hard to believe that the show has actually gotten better, but it has. It has guts and all the right stuff. It hasn't stumbled or cheaped out (the way that season 3 of STAR TREK - TOS did). Not only is it relevant to current social situations, it's also a fun popcorn chomper.
The five best non-news TV shows are arguably STAR TREK, MASH, I LOVE LUCY, THE SIMPSONS, and now GALACTICA. I've always argued the Trek is the best, not only for the actual show, but also for all of its post-cancellation importance (1st syndicated show, all of its social relevance, the films, the spin offs, the overall impact on science fiction as a whole, including TV/movies), and, to a lesser extent, the never ending popularity of Shatner.
GALACTICA, with some 60 odd episodes in the can by the end of this season (this counts the pilot), it will perhaps take over the 2d spot, perhaps the first. Lucy pioneered sit-coms, not only the idea of them, but how they are actually shot (ie - the 3 camera set up), and I've already noted Trek's importance to TV.
But GALACTICA features all the social relevance of Trek and MASH, without getting sanctimonious about it. MASH, esp after Alan Alda took over, became too preachy. The SIMPSONS, while usually still watchable, has long ago lost it's greatness. Trek, esp in the 3rd season, was often victimized by ever smaller budgets and censorship, as well as some just horrible plots (see SPOCK'S BRAIN). By the end of season 3 of STAR TREK, it was clear that it had blown it's wad - much as MASH did and the SIMPSONS are doing. LUCY, SIMPSONS, and MASH are ultimately comedies and I think this lessons their importance when compared to dramas.
At this point, there hasn't been a stinker in the bunch for BG, and many of the shows are instant classics.
What remains to be seen is if BG can garner wide recognition. The 2-hour season 3 premiere, "Occupation" / "Precipice," earned a 1.8 average household rating and drew an estimated 2.2 million viewers.
This is a two percent increase from the second half of Season Two, which aired on the cable network from January to March. The show saw bigger gains in the viewers age 25 to 54 demographic (seven percent), and viewers 18 to 49 (4 percent). The new episode of Galactica brought up the network's ratings an impressive 75 percent from the same period a year ago, representing a total viewership increase of 93 percent. The same key demographics increased more than 100 percent.
But, as good as this is for the sci-fi channel, it doesn't seem to have really gotten into the consciousness of the public. Yet. Hopefully it will, and hopefully the show can continue for another season or 2. Maybe not as important as some shows, but just possibly better. If you haven't seen the show, check it out...
john
evilgeniusentertainment.com
Hard to believe that the show has actually gotten better, but it has. It has guts and all the right stuff. It hasn't stumbled or cheaped out (the way that season 3 of STAR TREK - TOS did). Not only is it relevant to current social situations, it's also a fun popcorn chomper.
The five best non-news TV shows are arguably STAR TREK, MASH, I LOVE LUCY, THE SIMPSONS, and now GALACTICA. I've always argued the Trek is the best, not only for the actual show, but also for all of its post-cancellation importance (1st syndicated show, all of its social relevance, the films, the spin offs, the overall impact on science fiction as a whole, including TV/movies), and, to a lesser extent, the never ending popularity of Shatner.
GALACTICA, with some 60 odd episodes in the can by the end of this season (this counts the pilot), it will perhaps take over the 2d spot, perhaps the first. Lucy pioneered sit-coms, not only the idea of them, but how they are actually shot (ie - the 3 camera set up), and I've already noted Trek's importance to TV.
But GALACTICA features all the social relevance of Trek and MASH, without getting sanctimonious about it. MASH, esp after Alan Alda took over, became too preachy. The SIMPSONS, while usually still watchable, has long ago lost it's greatness. Trek, esp in the 3rd season, was often victimized by ever smaller budgets and censorship, as well as some just horrible plots (see SPOCK'S BRAIN). By the end of season 3 of STAR TREK, it was clear that it had blown it's wad - much as MASH did and the SIMPSONS are doing. LUCY, SIMPSONS, and MASH are ultimately comedies and I think this lessons their importance when compared to dramas.
At this point, there hasn't been a stinker in the bunch for BG, and many of the shows are instant classics.
What remains to be seen is if BG can garner wide recognition. The 2-hour season 3 premiere, "Occupation" / "Precipice," earned a 1.8 average household rating and drew an estimated 2.2 million viewers.
This is a two percent increase from the second half of Season Two, which aired on the cable network from January to March. The show saw bigger gains in the viewers age 25 to 54 demographic (seven percent), and viewers 18 to 49 (4 percent). The new episode of Galactica brought up the network's ratings an impressive 75 percent from the same period a year ago, representing a total viewership increase of 93 percent. The same key demographics increased more than 100 percent.
But, as good as this is for the sci-fi channel, it doesn't seem to have really gotten into the consciousness of the public. Yet. Hopefully it will, and hopefully the show can continue for another season or 2. Maybe not as important as some shows, but just possibly better. If you haven't seen the show, check it out...
john
evilgeniusentertainment.com