![]() |
Re: C300 & Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM - Lens Support?
Quote:
|
Re: C300 & Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM - Lens Support?
Sorry to come to the party late AND wrench it in a slightly different tack, but very keen on keeping my C100 'au naturel' for projects next year:
How about the 70-200 f4? Light enough for straight mount to camera? |
Re: C300 & Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM - Lens Support?
Yes. Doing that now with my Canon 70-200 F4 IS. Lovely combo and images.
|
Re: C300 & Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM - Lens Support?
Quote:
|
Re: C300 & Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM - Lens Support?
I hope I'm not hijacking this thread.. I'm trying to build my Canon Lens collection around the C100. I would like to hear opinions on the benefits of IS with the 70-200 f4. I'm tempted to go with non-IS and help purchase the 100mm macro. It's really double the price for IS, and I wonder if you're typically locked down (tripod) while this tight,, say greater than 100mm. Is there a focal length where IS is no longer viable for video. Lastly, 70-200mm IS or non-IS??
|
Re: C300 & Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM - Lens Support?
I have he 70-200mm f/2.8 non-IS lens. I rented the IS version several times before buying the non IS lens. In a pinch, if I had to get a long lens, hand held shot, the IS definitely made it possible. The downside is that the IS version is not parfocal. I ran into a number of situations where I would start focused on a tight shot and then widen to a mid shot and lose sharp focus. So, it's a toss up. If you don't mind refocusing when you reframe, it is nice to have the IS.
|
Re: C300 & Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM - Lens Support?
The IS is not par focal, but the non-IS is! Thanks, that's a major consideration.Thanks!
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:16 PM. |
DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2025 The Digital Video Information Network