![]() |
Re: C100: Be happy!
Nice one Matt.
The two things that bug me most are the PSF issue (surely everyone hates this - right?) and the fact I can only punch in to 2x. My eyes are getting older and I'd love to go to 5x and 10x like I can on the DSLRs (which I hate using now). Of course, Canon's next models should have 50p/60p as well as fixing the PSF. Please, pretty please Canon. I just shot some stuff about a guy running marathons and I really could have done with 60p in order to get 'better' progressive slo-mo. Oh well. |
Re: C100: Be happy!
Glad to see others understand the great benefit of critical reviews for both other readers and for manufacturers to improve products.
|
Re: C100: Be happy!
Quote:
I'm not sure we'll see many more improvements in terms of firmware for the C100 at this stage. I hope I'm wrong. |
Re: C100: Be happy!
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: C100: Be happy!
Quote:
As always as consumers, it's the safest bet to say that our requests to camera-makers isn't very likely to get taken into consideration because they are of course businesses, and they quite reasonably are catering to the hundreds if not thousands or hundreds of thousands of buyers/users of any particular camera/line of cameras, so a few dozen folks submitting feature requests/etc... aren't likely to have a big impact on them. It took the ridiculous success of the 5D2 to lead to the development of C series (my opinion, debatable fact) and whatever they're working on now im sure is taking into consideration a metric ton of research and data which maybe, just maybe, includes a tiny fraction of what they hear from folks like us. As always, buy a camera for what it is, not what you want it to be, and you'll be as this thread title suggests. I'm with Matt; post NAB i've yet to see something that i'd like to replace my C100 with. |
Re: C100: Be happy!
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:20 PM. |
DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2025 The Digital Video Information Network