Gints Klimanis |
November 18th, 2008 04:32 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeremy Nicholl
(Post 964411)
Why the Manhattan monitor? I want to keep things a small as possible and have been looking at 7 inch models, whereas the Manhattan is 10.5 inches. But I know nothing about field monitors, so I’m curious why you’ve gone for that model.
Jeremy
|
The Manhattan LCD 10.9" offers HDMI and component inputs. It does a good job with my Sony EX1, but even at 10.9", I don't think that its hugely better than the EX1's LCD in Expanded mode. The main freedom is that you don't have to keep your eyes within a few inches of the EX1. The EX1 has an excellent LCD that exceeds what is offered in the Manhattan model. I wonder what such technology would cost in a 10.9" size. Another crippling factor is that Sony does not output its Expanded mode to the component outputs, and these portable monitors don't have a zoom function. Ideally, I'd like to have a Picture-in-Picture the screen area used for 2x or 4c zoom, with the full scene in a corner. You could move the zoomed area around with the remote control.
If you don't really need mobility and battery power, I'd suggest one of those 15" 720P LCD TVs with component inputs. Also, a good improvement for on-camera LCDs is the HoodPro viewfinder magnifying shade that converts your LCD to a viewfinder-like device. Excellent.
|