DV Info Net

DV Info Net (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/)
-   Canon EOS Full Frame for HD (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/canon-eos-full-frame-hd/)
-   -   Canon Rep: "Were working on it" (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/canon-eos-full-frame-hd/234237-canon-rep-were-working.html)

Peer Landa April 30th, 2009 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by William Chung (Post 1135604)
I can say that most people that are looking for this firmware update will not be buying the "new" model that you speak of.

What makes you say this without knowing (I assume) what a "new" model would comprise?

Quote:

Would you buy a 1ds IV (since 1d will be cropped sensor which possibly could affect the low light ability of the video) for 8000$ just because it had 24p and manual aperture control?
Is this what Canon plans to do...? I'm confused.

Quote:

It just seems everyone is generalizing the situation a little too much.
And the above prospection wasn't?

Quote:

The kind of generalizing statements coming from people makes others who are not as informed wait and hope for a "Jesus cam" while they could be doing amazing stuff with the equipment out there now!
I'm not sure what "generalizing statements" you are referring to, but I for one think a forum discussion like this can be very helpful to those "who are not as informed" -- at this point, to wait and see what Canon does might be the best solution for some people. We'll see.

Quote:

They just seem to be based on the assumption that Canon would rather Nikon come out with a better camera and they sit on their laurels.
I don't understand the above sentence.

-- peer

Chris Hurd April 30th, 2009 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Luis de la Cerda (Post 1135082)
Uncrippling the 5D as it is now would help push sales of an already existing model even further.

No need to. The 5D Mk. II already sells very well, just as it is. Canon will indeed sell every single one that they make; in fact they're still having trouble delivering enough to meet the demand. And it would be that way even if the camera didn't have an HD video mode.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peer Landa (Post 1135105)
Remember, it took Canon just 5 months to upgrade their 1D MKIII to a 1Ds MKIII.

It's already been pointed out several times by several members, but it's important for you to understand that the 1Ds is *not* an upgrade to the 1D. You're making an incorrect assumption based on a confusing model numbering system. The 1D and 1Ds are two completely different product lines at two different price tiers.

The 1Ds Mk. III is an upgrade from the 1Ds Mk. II.

Likewise, the 1D Mk. III is an upgrade from the 1D Mk. II.

It's important to understand that these two cameras are completely different product lines, sold at completely different price points, targeting completely different markets. Hope this helps.

Meanwhile this thread has been circling back on itself and not really moving forward. Time to stick a fork in it, 'cause it's done. Thanks all,


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:05 AM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2025 The Digital Video Information Network