![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
If all you ever need is 16TB then tape is not for you. I have much more than 16TB and it's growing rapidly. HDDs are simply not cost effective once you get in to large amounts of footage. Also, recalculate for more than one backup, maybe three. So 16TBx3 = 48TB. Now imagine 64TBx3 = 192TB. Hard Disks = $10,560 The Tape solution (using your numbers) = $2,400 + $7,200 = $9,600. Now imagine 150TB or 300TB backup up x3. If you don't shoot much, or don't need to retain footage for more than the length of the project then tape is probably not for you. If you need to archive footage for future reference then tape is a viable and possible cheaper solution than hard disks. Imagine broadcasters than need to store petabytes of footage. Do you imagine they have lots of hard disks sat on a shelf? ;) |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:39 PM. |
DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2025 The Digital Video Information Network