DV Info Net

DV Info Net (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/)
-   Canon VIXIA Series AVCHD and HDV Camcorders (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/canon-vixia-series-avchd-hdv-camcorders/)
-   -   Canon HG10 - High Def HDD camcorder shipping in October (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/canon-vixia-series-avchd-hdv-camcorders/100215-canon-hg10-high-def-hdd-camcorder-shipping-october.html)

Paulo Teixeira August 2nd, 2007 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hse Kha (Post 722163)
Oh that is sad. It is so ironic that Panasonic and JVC have camcorders that record in full 1920x1080 with sensors that do half that resolution! Yet Canon has an amazingly high resolution sensor that can do 1920x1080, yet Canon chooses to reduce that to 1440x1080 when recording.

You forgot about the Hitachi Blu-Ray camcorders that are coming out this October. They have a 5.3 MP CMOS sensor and it records to 1920x1080 using h.264. Technically it should give you a higher detailed image than the Canon HG10, but then again even if the picture quality is better, I don’t think Hitachi’s implementation of h.264 will be as easy to edit as AVCHD. We’ll just have to wait until it comes out.
http://dvinfo.net/conf/showthread.ph...196#post722196

It’s funny how right when Hitachi decides to announce their new camcorders, Panasonic and Canon immediately announces their own just to take some media attention off them. Not saying that I wouldn’t do the same thing.

Now all we need is to have one of these companies release a semi Prosumer model just like the GS400. Perhaps there saving the best for last.

Wayne Morellini August 3rd, 2007 10:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Serge Victorovich (Post 721898)
Chris, HG10 use same DIGIC DVII codec as HV20. It is programmable.
25Mbps of mpeg2 is better (for me) than 15Mbps h264. I wish only 25-50 AVC-intra:)
Look at this tread on doom9:http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=128498

HG10 also utilise same good cmos 1/2,7" imager as HV20.

I can not afford to download the original source file, but the performances of the different codecs are suspiciously high. What is the footage like, how complex is the detail, the movement, and the noise, how plain are surfaces?

Wayne Morellini August 3rd, 2007 10:59 AM

Also, how much grain does it have? I understand that Mpeg2 had problems with that.

Chris Hurd August 3rd, 2007 10:42 PM

Gizmodo's take on the HG10, with pics:

http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/hd-camcor...der-284706.php

Chris Hurd August 7th, 2007 08:04 AM

1 Attachment(s)
For anybody who was curious about how to focus manually with the HG10, it's managed via the large round selector dial and joystick located on the flip-out LCD viewfinder bezel. Should have more info about that shortly,

Wes Vasher August 7th, 2007 09:23 AM

On the HV20 I have a hard time (not horrible, but could be better) actually using the manual focus because the LCD in it's open position interferes with the manual/auto focus toggle button. Also I find it a little difficult to get to the focus dial when the LCD is open. I think if that ring dial on the LCD is smooth and offers enough adjustability it'd be the preferred location, at least for me, not sure what others' thoughts are.

Also I never use MF without the focus assist function and on the HV20 the focus assist button is on the LCD so it's strange to hit that on the LCD, and then go to the focus dial, if this was handled in a closer proximity then it would be more convenient.

If the camera would only record 24p files instead of 60i files... sigh.

Chris Barcellos August 7th, 2007 09:32 AM

Focus Issue
 
Wes:

As fars as HV20, the focus assist wheels some of us have been rigging seem to work pretty well. I m shooting with 35mm adapter most of time, so it isn't big issue with me, but manual focus can be handle pretty nicely with a fairly inexpensive mod to the HV20.

This new set up on the HG10 looks like that will be out the door....

Wes Vasher August 7th, 2007 03:21 PM

Chris, good point. A focus wheel attachment is on my to-do list. Your point about making the same type of device for the HG10 is a good one, though I bet it could still be done somehow.

James Rhodes August 8th, 2007 12:02 AM

1920x1080
 
Looking at the Canon Mini site for this camera, it now says "Canon Exclusive 1920x1080 " so is this 1440x1080 or 1920x1080 ? It seems to be confusing at this point.

http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/co...&modelid=15617

Chris Hurd August 8th, 2007 12:34 AM

No confusion -- see http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showpost....7&postcount=26

1920 x 1080 is the native resolution of the CMOS sensor. It's recorded as 1440 x 1080 anamorphic.

Serge Victorovich August 8th, 2007 07:54 AM

Native resolution of CIS (cmos image sensor) is more than 1920x1080.
Possible its 2048x1440. Look at max res. in photo mode to know real resolution of CIS. For video mode used only ROI 1920x1080.

Type 1/2.7" CMOS
Total pixels 2.96 megapixel
Effective pixels
HD MOVIE: Approx 2.07 megapixels
STILLS: 2.76 megapixels

Austin Meyers August 9th, 2007 10:36 AM

focus assist
 
focus assist engages automatically when you flip into manual focus (when not recording) and spin the wheel, but from what Chris and I could tell there is no peaking, only magnification...

Steve Royer August 9th, 2007 11:34 AM

Could I assume that this new camcorder will be able to use everything (lenses, shoe accessories, batteries) that the HV20 can?

Chris Hurd August 9th, 2007 10:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Royer (Post 726211)
Could I assume that this new camcorder will be able to use everything (lenses, shoe accessories, batteries) that the HV20 can?

Yes to all of the above. Hope this helps,

David Braund August 16th, 2007 01:09 PM

ive noticed that the HG10 has HDMI out

is it possible to bypas compression and record to a laptop using a better compression method?

as you can do with the HV20

i would prefer this over the HV20, but only if you can do that

David Saraceno August 16th, 2007 06:19 PM

You would need some card for the laptop

The only HDMI card I know of is the Intensity and that is a PCI card.

David Braund August 17th, 2007 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by David Saraceno (Post 730135)
You would need some card for the laptop

The only HDMI card I know of is the Intensity and that is a PCI card.

yea im aware of the blackmagic card

so witht hat ill be able to record direct to disk right?

might get this instead of the HV20

Serge Victorovich August 17th, 2007 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by David Braund (Post 730439)
yea im aware of the blackmagic card

so witht hat ill be able to record direct to disk right?

might get this instead of the HV20

For laptop need ExpressCard with HDMI input - not exist today in market.
Magma Express Box is only solution to connect Intensity and laptop.

David Braund August 17th, 2007 03:22 PM

i wont be using a laptop, i built a PC specifically for on location recording

so if this cam can do that, n has the features on the HV20 ill get, looks much better aswell

Ken Nelson August 17th, 2007 03:25 PM

Missing LANC
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jason Lowe (Post 721803)
It's very odd that Canon has all but eliminated the LANC jack when you consider that Canon markets a LANC controller. I would think the possibility of selling a $200 accessory (that's usually not found in stores but is available for purchase on Canon's' website) would keep the LANC jack on everything but the cheapest miniDV models.

Lack of a LANC port stopped me from buying an HV20.

While it doesn't make up for the lack of a LANC the HV10 and HV20 do have a wireless remote that ships with them. The HV10 has a rear mounted sensor so that you can signal from behind the camera. The HV20 has a front mounted sensor. It would have been nice to have front and back.

E.J. Sadler August 27th, 2007 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack Zhang (Post 722184)
My dream for Consumer HD (or HD in general)...
3 1920x1080 global shutter CMOS sensors capturing in H.264 at 100Mbps in 1080p60.

Heck, I'll make that my new signature! If the dream is possible, one of the companies must make it so!


With CMOS there's no need for three chips. Canon's full frame CMOS DSLRs have phenomenal image quality and no CA issues. One chip means better images, less power draw, no CA issues, and cheaper/better glass.

The dream is a Canon 1920x1080 CMOS chip in full 35mm size with an EOS EF mount writing to CF/SD/Expresscard slots or firewire with an selectable 25/50/100Mbps codec.

Wayne Morellini August 28th, 2007 04:47 AM

I have been wondering if Canon is holding out till they can release an video codec chip based on the new Jpeg standard, that is said to be equivalent to Jpeg2000 (which would be similar to H264 Intra) but is an enhancement to existing Jpeg. If they switched to any of these new codecs it would be an great improvement at 100mb/s. I would love an noise free, high latitude, sensitive, 50p Canon 35mm or TX2 at 100mb/s.

I guess there is as much chance of Panasonic Lumix doing this than Canon.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:37 PM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2025 The Digital Video Information Network