don't worry about quality...hf100/11 are equal or better than hdv...

look for example at my footage since i'm testing my hf100:
-> [Canon HF10/100 AVCHD] Topic Ufficiale - Videomakers.net

in the second post of gannjunior (it's me!!) you can download some videos...i'm updating it very often...in the next days i'll post other videos...

ciao!

Nice one, I'm just checking out your link now :)
I've decided I'm going to test out the HF11 to see what I think.
:)
Will head out in the AMG Black first (as it gave the old HV20 problems), and see how it copes.

My HF11 should arrive today or tomorrow, will try and perform some tests and I'll start a new thread for it.
(I have 7 days to trial it)

my HF11 is also arriving tomorrow, according to UPS tracking status... :)

the reason I'm replying is that your location is listed as the UK.

If I take my US HF11 to the UK(or other EU countries), will I be able to plug
it into the HDTVs over there, using HDMI, and watch the footage in the
original high-def shot in 24p or 30p? (and vice versa, for UK HF11s on US HDTVs)



Thanks! :)

Hi,

Well, I'm still waiting for my one to arrive, seems Canon have been very slow at getting them out across the UK :(
But to answer your question, yep you'll be able to hook it up.

I got my HF11. It's way better than I expected! Took a little while to get used to because
of its small size.

At USD$789, it's a really great little HD camcorder!

The picture quality is just as good, sometimes better, than my old Canon HV20 HDV camcorder.
Just bought a 37mm-to-43mm stpe up ring, now all my HV20's lenses/filters can be used on
the HF11 as well! :)

My one arrived last week :)

I decided to keep it, as the pro's far outweigh the cons of the HV20/30.
And like you I bought one of those little rings but so I could use my mighty brevis and all my Nikon lenses :D

I too made the exodus from HDV using the Canon HV20 to AVCHD with the HF100. Owning and using an HF100 is convincing proof as far as I am concerned. I find it to be in a whole new league compared to the HDV predecessor.

I've never owned or used the newer HV30, but the HF100 is clearly superior to the HV20.

The step up ring makes re-use of the HV20 lens convertors and accesories very affordable for the HF100. And the larger 43mm Canon WD43H wide angle converter just does a wonderful job edge to edge when used on the smaller 37mm HF100.

I've never looked back. With the right CPU and software, AVCHD workflow is light-years better IMHO.

Larry

Would you all concur that this camera is good enough for shooting Wedding videos?

As good as this little camera is, let's not get carried away. It's still a consumer camera.
A wedding video is a commercial professional exercise and therefore needs a camera/cameras with full manual control and easy accessibility to those controls.
You might be able to use it as a B camera maybe, but no way should it be relied upon as a main camera.
As for the AVCHD format, that's a different matter. It's an exciting format - one wonders how much further it will be improved in the near future...

Very interesting to see my HF100 has travelled halfway around the world.

At least my picture of my cam has.

I don't mind, tho, especially since I didn't mark it (with copyright notice) in any way. The photo you used was shot on the Chadbourne Ranch just off the grounds of Fort Chadbourne (one of the old Texas frontier forts). I was waiting for the Fort Chadbourne Cavalry (a living history unit) to meet me there so I could get some footage of them out and away from any sign of civilization. So I shot a picture of my camera on tripod to use in another presentation.

I had posted it on somewhere on this forum to show the LCD hood (from CineTactics.com) and the Hama rectangular lens hood I've found useful.

You are welcome to continue using it, I was just surprised to follow your link and find a photo I had shot on an Italian forum.

Ciao,

Bruce Foreman

P.S. Looks like we are both "fans" of a great little cam. I sure enjoy using mine.

Hi guys,
I have a hv20, looking to upgrade (hopefully it's an upgrade) to the HF11 or HG21 for the 1920x1080 30p.

For the project I have in mind, I'm going to have to have the lcd folded in (closed) when recording. Can the HF11 record video with the lcd folded in, or does it shut off? It doesn't have a viewfinder, right?

If not, I'll get the HG21 that has the viewfinder.

Thanks,
Bob C

The HF11 has no viewfinder.

Get the HG21 (but not the HG20 that has no viewfinder too).

Hi,
I know that the HF11 has no viewfinder. Can it record video with the lcd in the closed position?

Thanks,
Bob C

Sorry, I've misunderstood your question.

When you close the LCD, the HF11 enters in stand-by mode (even if it was in recording mode).
When you re-open the LCD screen, the HF11 goes back in ready mode and you need to push again the record button to go back to the recording mode.

So, to solve your problem, I think that you will get a HG21...

Yes it can, just rotate the LCD as in the attached. The attached is a HF10 but this applies towards HF11 as well.

Hey that will work... why didn't I think of that?

Thanks Bruno and Mugurel.

Bob C

I've been using the HG21 for the last few days and I'm really impressed with this puppy! I've been using a Sony SR12 since it came out and I have to admit the HG21 is superior in almost all regards. The addition of the viewfinder was the only reason I ventured back into Canon waters, but I wasn't expecting results quite like this.

I've found the HG21 to have superior detail, sharpness and color accuracy relative to my SR12. Shooting the same scenes, at times the SR12 almost looks like it has a slight haze over it. The degree of transparency of the footage is really amazing. It really seems as if the Canon lens is playing a large part in this. Then again, I had tested the HF10 and wasn't as impressed with that cam as the HG21.

The only area I'd still give an edge to the SR12 is sound quality. The sound is a bit richer & fuller on the SR12. But even with that, I simply can't overlook the superiority of the HG21's image quality. :)

When you first bought your SR 12 i remember you saying the the picture was every bit as good as your hv30,i know reports give the hg21 very good marks but using an SR 12 i find colours good with clear pictures without sign of haze,i think i am right that the hg 21 cannot manual focus as easy as the sony is this correct.Oh for a HC1 shell with its on cam control and pictures up to the hg21 standard,i guess your SR12 will be on its way ? now good luck with the new cam.

I read elsewhere on the 'net that the HF11/HG20/21 all come with a newer remote than the HV20/30, and it allows manual focus; so it can be done without bumping/vibrating the camcorder!

Bob C

Hi Martyn. Yes, you are correct, when I had gotten my SR12, I found it was very close in PQ to my HV20 (I never had an HV30). But the new HG21 seems to be a different animal to me. I agree, when I look at my SR12 footage on its own I see no haze, but when you do an A/B with the HG21, it almost appears as if the same SR12 footage is a bit hazy.

The HG21's clarity is unreal and the color is very good. The Sony colors are somewhat warmer, but I'm actually finding the HG21's colors to be more accurate.

I also tried manual focusing and I do find it just as easy as the SR12.

Bob, I'm not aware that you can manually focus with the remote...I don't think I've ever seen that ability on a consumer cam. The HG21 does have a 'manual focus assist' which enlarges the center area and makes the manual focus process quite easy. The process also allows you to lock in 'infinity' if you so choose.

I can confirm that the Canon wireless remote WL-D88 controls every function that's available at the joystick, including the last shot review, video light on/off, exposure adjust up/down, audio input level up/down and manual focus in/out. This applies to the entire Canon VIXIA line, not just the HF11, plus the standard definition FS Series camcorders as well. Hope this helps,

Wasn't aware of that Chris, I'll take another look at the remote while the cam is hooked up to my plasma. I'm not sure I'd ever use the feature, but it is interesting.

I'm so impressed with this cam, my SR12 is going to Ebay! :)

Hi Ross,

I follow your posts since some years now and I know that you spend enough time with your cams to have a trustable judgment ;)...
As you, I was an owner of a Sony HC1, then a canon HV20. But compared to you, I've jumped the 'steps' HV10 and SR12 because I cannot afford to change my cam every year!...

Now, I'm very interested in the HG21 : I'm plaised with the results given by my HV20 in HDV but I'm ready to jump into the AVCHD wagon only if the 24mb/s offered by the HG21 is a real plus.

When you've compared your SR12 and HG21, that was both in 16 or 17mb/s?

Had you time to compare the 17mb/s and 24mb/s modes of the HG21 in difficult situations (movements + many details scene)? What is you opinion on the results in 24mb/s?

Hi Bruno,

Yeah, I hate to admit it, but I'm a compulsive 'upgrader'. I had looked at the HF10, but didn't see anything that warranted my replacing my SR12. So I was a bit surprised by the improvement in the HG21 (the hard drive equivalent of the HF11) relative to my SR12.

To be honest, all my testing was done at 24mpbs vs the highest bitrate, 16mbps, of the Sony. I did that because I always tend to shoot at the highest quality modes available in any camera I own. I haven't actually done an A/B with the HG21 at its two highest bitrates, but from what I've seen and read, the difference between 17mbps and 24mbps will be the retention of fine detail during movement.

It seems to me that the vast majority of the improvements over the Sony can still be seen at Canon's 2nd highest bitrate. The difference in clarity with many scenes can actually be striking.

My A/Bs with these two cameras actually ended sooner than is typical for me due to the consistent improvement I saw in virtually every scene. I showed my wife one of the A/Bs I did in our kitchen and she actually responded with a "Wow" (she didn't know which camera was which). For her to say "wow" on one of my A/Bs is a bit unusual as her more typical response is "I don't know, they both look good". :)

Ken, thanks for your input.