DV Info Net

DV Info Net (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/)
-   Canon VIXIA Series AVCHD and HDV Camcorders (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/canon-vixia-series-avchd-hdv-camcorders/)
-   -   Thinking of HV30 BUT..... (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/canon-vixia-series-avchd-hdv-camcorders/127898-thinking-hv30-but.html)

Ron Cooper August 12th, 2008 09:03 AM

Thinking of HV30 BUT.....
 
I have three issues about the HV30 pre-puchase. - Can you easily record HDV back to tape via firewire, after editing, so you can then look at your HDV masterpiece on the TV straight off the camera ?

Also, can you record HD in from the HDMI socket and how does it handle lowish indoor light, from, say, at a concert in the local hall where you want shots of the audience but the main lights are not on, only the stage lighting ?

R.C.

Chris Hurd August 12th, 2008 09:28 AM

1. Yes.

2. No (HDMI on any camcorder is output only).

3. That's a frequent topic of discussion around here.

Chris Barcellos August 12th, 2008 11:18 AM

1. You can capture your edit back, and watch on standard tv with composite, and even set aspect ratio of TV, or you can feed a screen with HDMI input with the playback of HDV picture and sound.

2. I ve used the camera to shoot kids plays and lighted stages, and it worked along side my FX1 pretty well, though FX1 handles darker situation better (less grain).

3. Have not used HDMI as a capture vehicle, though some are using it that way, and swearing by it. Takes a special capture card, however.

Ron Cooper August 12th, 2008 06:13 PM

Thanks Chris.
And I thought I was the only one wanting audience shots !

Can't fathom why they don't have an HDMI or a component I/P when everything else is there for HD recording.

R.C.

Jack Zhang August 13th, 2008 06:24 PM

HDMI was not meant for use to be recorded for consumer needs, only professional. That's why there's the Intensity Pro and the latest Decklink.

However, we can hold our breaths for the official announcement of a Cineform HDMI recorder TBA...

Steve Witt August 14th, 2008 10:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack Zhang (Post 920262)

However, we can hold our breaths for the official announcement of a Cineform HDMI recorder TBA...

What is the latest news on this....if any? Has there been any updates or hints as to when it may be released? I remember hearing about the conception of the idea, but then nothing for a long time.

Sherif Choudhry August 17th, 2008 10:54 AM

Ron, I dont know your budget but if you can afford a Canon A1, Sony V1/Z1, or even a Sony Z7/Ex1 etc - those are cameras that really support video-making in the field very well.

If your budget is at the HV30 ballpark, then the competitors are equivalents Sonys and Pannys etc. with AVCHD and record to hard disk.

I found the HV30 quite astonishing in that there isnt much of any excuse for blaming the camera anymore. I've used it in low-light at school plays in multi-camera, multi-miked shoots and was surprised how WELL it cut with the Sony V1 footage. Yes, you can see more noise than the V1 in the poorest light conditions (which is 8x more pricey).

But the HV30 taught me to to stop endlessly reading reviews and just go out there and SHOOT. I find I cant blame the camera anymore, its my camera technique that needs to improve!!

So I would recommend it unless theres something about the form factor of the Sony/Panny AVCHD cameras you like (or you want avoid tape and use hard-disk.) Personally I still like tape for archiving.

Brian Boyko August 17th, 2008 12:04 PM

I don't understand the on-the-fenceness of HV30 vs. HX-A1. The HX-A1, which costs four times as much, will produce a better picture in low light and has some features, like focus rings, that will make the picture look fantastic if you know how to use them.

However, the HV30 costs 1/4th the price, has most of the same features...

If you're doing pro work
AND
You can afford it

Get the XH-A1

If you're doing pro work
AND
You can't afford it

Get the HV30 for now, and save up for an XH-A1, you'll get about $500-600 of your $800 back when you sell the HV30.

If you're not doing pro work

Get the HV30.

John Lewis August 18th, 2008 02:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sherif Choudhry (Post 921335)
...the HV30 taught me to to stop endlessly reading reviews and just go out there and SHOOT. I find I cant blame the camera anymore, its my camera technique that needs to improve!!

This is exactly the right attitude to have. Obviously cameras continue to improve, but if we wait for the next big thing, or are constantly looking to get whatever upcoming camera is getting hyped at the moment... then we'll never actuially get around to shooting anything!

I have an A1 and an HV30, so I'm fortunate to be able to habve both the compact HDV and the more fully-featured larger rig. But if you are looking to get HD on a budget, then the HV30 is a fantastic camera, and it functions as a playback deck for it's larger cousins, so when/if you do upgrade to an A1 or an H1, then you already have your deck!

We need less procrastinating and more shooting! Just get a HV30 and get out there :)

Ron Cooper August 19th, 2008 07:10 AM

Thanks everyone for your interesting comments.

To set the record straight I am not a pro, but a serious amateur who doesn't want to look like channel nine on holiday whenever I travel.

At present I have a Sony A1P which I like for its compactness and the XLR adaptor, which I don't have to use unless I need to use my pro AKG condensers. The ability to remove this and use a small ext. compact mic through the 3.5 mic jack is appealing to me. This is the setup I use most of the time.

However, lately after reviewing footage of our recent overseas trip, I was disappointed in the low light performance of this camera with its graininess.

R.C.

Brian Boyko August 19th, 2008 07:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ron Cooper (Post 921956)
Thanks everyone for your interesting comments.

To set the record straight I am not a pro, but a serious amateur who doesn't want to look like channel nine on holiday whenever I travel.

At present I have a Sony A1P which I like for its compactness and the XLR adaptor, which I don't have to use unless I need to use my pro AKG condensers. The ability to remove this and use a small ext. compact mic through the 3.5 mic jack is appealing to me. This is the setup I use most of the time.

However, lately after reviewing footage of our recent overseas trip, I was disappointed in the low light performance of this camera with its graininess.

R.C.

Well, you can search Vimeo and try to find a low-light performance shot of the HV30, though if you're -already- at the Sony A1P, you might as well try the Canon XH-A1.

Robert M Wright August 19th, 2008 11:53 AM

An HV30 may give you better low light performance than the Sony A1 (I don't really know firsthand), but it's not going to be a huge improvement (like you would get with an FX1 or XH-A1).

Chris Hurd August 19th, 2008 12:19 PM

Differences in low light performance among HDV camcorders are marginal at best. Choose the camcorder that feels best in your hands and just shoot.

Brian Boyko August 20th, 2008 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Hurd (Post 922103)
Differences in low light performance among HDV camcorders are marginal at best. Choose the camcorder that feels best in your hands and just shoot.

Low light differences between the HV20/30 and the XH-A1 are marginal? If that's the case, I might as well just get the Beachtek and stick with the HV20.

David Ruhland August 20th, 2008 07:09 PM

HV30 a lil grainy but acceptable..
 
Im going to chime in here although i am very much a newbie at the whole video relm, as changing market conditions forced me from my still photograhy business to learn video..(No regrets) I do understand noise and in very low light conditions the HV30 is grainy My experience was shooting a crowd at a party when it was dusk and then into nightfall with just party lights.

Now saying this, I must add that I dont own a High End HD vid camera. I do own a CANON GL 2 that i like very much. I only do video for computer DVs and WEb work, so high def is not a priorty for me at this time. There definately is a difference when recording and comparing Standard Def to Standard Def.

I do know however it takes one mean computing machine to process the HDV footage of the HV30.

I also travel to China often for business and take my HV30 with me, like someone said its a little less conspicious with a HV30 vs an A1 or the like. I have made 5 trips to China in the past 5 months, My GL 2 only made one of those trips, HV30 made the rest! Id be more then happy to email you a clip from the HV30 if you would like.

So in a nut shell... Buy the HV 30 you will be very impressed with its performance. The only thing i dont like is the lack of manual controls. But it is the first camera i grab when heading out the door now. Hope this helps!

John Lewis August 21st, 2008 01:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brian Boyko (Post 922714)
Low light differences between the HV20/30 and the XH-A1 are marginal? If that's the case, I might as well just get the Beachtek and stick with the HV20.

I have an XH-A1 and an HV30, I'd say that the A1 offers a far better low-light image, primarily because you have so many custom options for reducing grain, altering the gamma etc. etc. so there is actually a huge difference between the two.

However, there is also a huge difference in the price, and that sort of functionality is why you spend £2000 more to get the A1 :)

HV30 is a bit grainy in very low light (i.e. at night under dim table lamps) but then all consumer camcorders are bad under low-light. The second you have to add gain to your image you are out of luck.

If you have to do a lot of low-light shooting, and your budget won't stretch to an XH-A1, then you would probably do well to get yourself a secondhand prosumer DV camera, like the PD150 or similar, these rigs will be going for about the same price as a new HV30 these days, and you will get excellent low-light performance albiet at SD resolutions.

Tom Hardwick August 21st, 2008 02:02 AM

'albiet at SD resolutions' and at 4:3 I might add John.

'The only thing i dont like is the lack of manual controls.' said David. Well, the HV30 does have lots and lots of manual controls (though not over the internal NDs), so I think David means he doesn't like the way he's asked to access them. Quite a different thing.

tom.

Shawn McCalip August 25th, 2008 01:28 PM

My experience operating an HV30 has been relatively positive. True, it gets very grainy in low light. However, you can't realistically compare an HV30 to something like an A1. I'm using it as a second camera to my Sony HVR-V1u and it's done a decent job so far. The only thing I've noticed that I really don't care for is that my HV30 casts a green hue to everything. I had it out with the V1 for a project just this past weekend, and even after white-balancing both cameras side by side at the same time, the HV30 footage has a noticeable green hue. It takes quite a bit of color correction to get it to match up with the V1, but then again, I was expecting that. Aside from that, its small, lightweight, easy to use, and delivers a reasonably satisfactory image for what you're paying. I'd recommend it.

Sean James August 25th, 2008 07:56 PM

How about reducing the grain/noise with software. That usually softens images, but...

Any experiences with the topic of cleaning up shots?

Shawn McCalip August 25th, 2008 10:43 PM

I don't have much experience with dedicated noise reduction software, but I've had a few challenging projects that involved fixing up some footage well enough to splice it in with higher quality material. You'll have to fiddle with brightness and contrast along with whatever color correction tools you have in your NLE of choice. Unfortunately, depending on how much grain is in the picture, you might not be able to completely do away with it. There's that saying of "garbage in, garbage out" that holds a bit of truth in these situations as well. So, if you can avoid shooting with your gain turned up, its worth it.

Peter Moretti August 26th, 2008 04:46 AM

You can control the gain applied by the HV-30. Setting all the exposure properties manually is kind of PITA, but it can be done.

Also, you can use Spotlight Mode, which will never add gain. However, you are limited to auto white balance only.

Sherif Choudhry August 29th, 2008 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sean James (Post 924843)
How about reducing the grain/noise with software. That usually softens images, but...

Any experiences with the topic of cleaning up shots?

Yes, I have a plug in that works really well to eliminate noise - i use it for old digital8 footage - Render time shoots up though -

-i dont use it for hdv as i have realised that if i shoot in such low light that grain appears i am being stupid....GET SOME DARN LIGHTS SHERIF I SAYS TO ME-SELF... in a hobbit accent...

- I read the post about using it in low light on holiday - i mean c'mon - do you mean videoing the lads at the nightclub at 2am drinking, or the kids in bed with the lights turned off - or paris sky at night -ha, ha - why are we debating this...

Ron Cooper August 30th, 2008 01:19 AM

Thanks guys.

Does any one have any experience with comparing the Sony SR-12 with the HV-30 ? I know the Sony is an HDD / AVCHD format and I am a bit skeptical of AVCHD, but maybe now, this is unwarranted.

RC.

Ron Cooper August 30th, 2008 07:04 AM

[QUOTE=Sherif Choudhry;926766]Yes, I have a plug in that works really well to eliminate noise - i use it for old digital8 footage - Render time shoots up though -

Can you please enlighten me on this plug in. Looks interesting Sherif.

RC.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:20 PM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network