DV Info Net

DV Info Net (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/)
-   Canon VIXIA Series AVCHD and HDV Camcorders (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/canon-vixia-series-avchd-hdv-camcorders/)
-   -   Intensity doesn't support HV20 (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/canon-vixia-series-avchd-hdv-camcorders/92221-intensity-doesnt-support-hv20.html)

Derek Green May 12th, 2007 09:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Terence Krueger (Post 678162)
derek.. what!?

thats nutty. i wonder what could be wrong with that cable that it would trigger the low res output.

good to know its working though and its something super simple for other people to check if they have issues.

terence

I know! who would have thought... what is really ironic about this is, I bought the Velocity cable first, but UPS screwed up my delivery so I went and picked up the Energy cable from Sears. When the Velocity cable arrived a week late, I threw it in storage not wanting to open the package because I was going to sell it since I already had another cable. You were the first person on the net to post about it working, so it got me thinking to trouble shoot the rest of the pipeline. So, basically, if my cable had of arrived on time, none of this would have happened.

Hey, with the NEOHD, are you able to get a signal on 10bit setting? I'm only getting a signal on 8bit.

Derek Green May 12th, 2007 09:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John Hotze (Post 678170)
I think you may have stumbled onto why there is such a broad price range in HDMI cables. When I bought mine at Best Buy they went from one brand at about $60 to a Monster at $120 for a basic 6 foot I think. Guess I won't bother adding any to my toolkit with the off brand Internet HDMI's for under $20. Guess the old adage - "You get what you pay for" is pretty true in the long run.

Yeah, I guess hey. The Energy was $40, I think it's 3 feet. The Velocity was around $80 but it's a 15 footer. From what I've read ALL HDMI cables support 1080i, which is what the HV20 is putting out. For a cable to only support DV resolution is insane. There's really no point since HDMI is all about HD resolution.

Roy Colquitt May 12th, 2007 09:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Derek Green (Post 678149)
It WAS the HDMI cable! It wouldn't allow a 1080 signal, just a 480.

ENERGY HDMI CABLE = BAD
VELOCITY HDMI CABLE = GOOD

When you say Velocity HDMI cable, do you mean the Cables to Go brand "Velocity" HDMI cable?

That's what I com up with on a web search.

http://www.compusa.com/products/prod...ity_HDMI_Cable

That's apparently their "cheap" model.

Terence Krueger May 12th, 2007 09:26 PM

my friend is trying to fix his dvinfo account, he cant post for some reason. ill let him answer any usage questions, im sick of being middleman :)

hdmi will downgrade the signal if it doesnt get the right feedback from teh display(capture card in this case). the only thing i can think of is the cable not having the right impredence and the camera didnt like it. i bet most people who buy these cables cant tell the difference between HD and SD and wouldnt know to complain. i forced a best buy employee to hook up the hv20 to a 1080p tv for me, he couldnt understand why i wanted to do that because "HDV is an uncompressed format".

terence

David Newman May 12th, 2007 09:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Derek Green (Post 678172)
Hey, with the NEOHD, are you able to get a signal on 10bit setting? I'm only getting a signal on 8bit.

Camera is only sending 8-bit, yet the compression upconverts it to 10 automatically. If you had a 10-bit HDMI source you can directly support that from NEO HD or 2K (not NEO HDV.)

Roy Colquitt May 12th, 2007 09:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Derek Green (Post 678173)
From what I've read ALL HDMI cables support 1080i, which is what the HV20 is putting out. For a cable to only support DV resolution is insane. There's really no point since HDMI is all about HD resolution.

If a cable or certain cables work, it would have to be more a matter of a quirk between the HV20 and Intensity rather than being the case that some HDMI cables "don't support HD"

In my setup, the same cable that's not working between the HV20 and Intensity works fine between the HV20 and a 1080i HDTV.

Derek Green May 12th, 2007 11:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roy Colquitt (Post 678180)
When you say Velocity HDMI cable, do you mean the Cables to Go brand "Velocity" HDMI cable?

That's what I com up with on a web search.

http://www.compusa.com/products/prod...ity_HDMI_Cable

That's apparently their "cheap" model.

I don't think that's the same brand. The one I have is called IMPACT ACOUSTICS VELOCITY HDMI. I got it from a Canadian online retailer tigerdirect.ca

Derek Green May 13th, 2007 12:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by David Newman (Post 678183)
Camera is only sending 8-bit, yet the compression upconverts it to 10 automatically. If you had a 10-bit HDMI source you can directly support that from NEO HD or 2K (not NEO HDV.)

Hi David, I understand the camera is only putting out 8bit and the Intensity is only capturing 8bit, but, if I understand you correctly, you're saying if you set NEO HD to capture 1080 4:2:2 8bit, it'll upconvert the 8bit signal to 10bit anyways? Do I understand you correctly on that?

As a side observation, without the HDV compression masking the picture and seeing the uncompressed monitor picture so clean, it's sure ALOT easier to see the 8bit limitations and color banding from the 8bit signal.

Terence Krueger May 13th, 2007 12:36 AM

"As a side observation, without the HDV compression masking the picture and seeing the uncompressed monitor picture so clean, it's sure ALOT easier to see the 8bit limitations and color banding from the 8bit signal"

you are probvably mostly seeing the limitations of the monitor assuming its an lcd, as they are prone to banding particualrly in the darks. the limits of 8 bit arent perceptable to the eye usually. every display outside a few higher end tv's inputs an 8 bit signal. notebook lcd's are 6 bit. the limits of 8 bit show up when trying to manipulate the footage, which is inherently reducing the amount of colour info.

saving as a 10 bit format, even if you only started with 8 bits will allow you some headroom in post. (similar to how its better to convert to 16 bit in photoshop to adjust curves and such, then switch back when completed) you dont gain any colour info, but you lose less.

its a bit dissapointing that the camera only outputs 8 bit, but based on the footage, i dont think the sensor has much more than 8 bits dynamic range anyway, so it wont make a huge difference.

terence.

Solomon Chase May 13th, 2007 12:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Terence Krueger (Post 678161)
3 drive bays in a notebook, ive never seen that. theyd have to support raid too (windows software raid may or may not work well).

i think youve confused maximum write speed and sustained write speed though. because a drive is a disk spinning at a constant speed, the begining of the writing and the end can have wildly different speeds. plus due to the controller etc it will fluctuate. for something like real time capture you need to look at the minimum write speed, which for the seagate 7200.2 160gb is a tiny bit over 30mB/s

The laptop with three hard drives has Intel's ICH8R hardware RAID. Very fast and efficient chipset. Supports SATA150/300 RAID 0/1/5. Laptop model is "CLEVO D900C" coming out in a few weeks.

http://www.clevo.com.tw/products/D900C.asp

And you are right about the write speed. Minimum should be closer to 40-45MB/s since it claims a 22% faster performance than the seagate 7200.2 you mentioned. 3x40MB/s is 120MB, which any overhead would bring it under the target rate for uncompressed. (very close though)

Terence Krueger May 13th, 2007 01:11 AM

the target rate for uncompressed is 150mB/s for 10 bit. which is what most people would want i think.

edit: also 22% faster than 30mB/s is 37mB/s.
and that "notebook" isnt really a notebook. its a folding desktop. the batteries in the old version lasts 15 -20 mins tops. i dont see this one being any better with even more stuff in it and the hard disks under full load. it also weighs nearly 15 lbs.


terence

Derek Green May 13th, 2007 08:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Terence Krueger (Post 678222)
you are probvably mostly seeing the limitations of the monitor assuming its an lcd, as they are prone to banding particualrly in the darks. the limits of 8 bit arent perceptable to the eye usually. every display outside a few higher end tv's inputs an 8 bit signal. notebook lcd's are 6 bit. the limits of 8 bit show up when trying to manipulate the footage, which is inherently reducing the amount of colour info.

saving as a 10 bit format, even if you only started with 8 bits will allow you some headroom in post. (similar to how its better to convert to 16 bit in photoshop to adjust curves and such, then switch back when completed) you dont gain any colour info, but you lose less.

its a bit dissapointing that the camera only outputs 8 bit, but based on the footage, i dont think the sensor has much more than 8 bits dynamic range anyway, so it wont make a huge difference.

terence.

Actually, it's a CRT, I'm not sure how many bits of color those can display? It's really noticeable on a solid color. I was pointing the camera at my greenscreen and could clearly see where the mix of different shades of green broke down (I only had an overhead bulb on). I actually think this is a good thing, it should make keying easier because you won't have as many colors bleeding together from the HDV compression. Anyways, I will have more time today to start some more in depth testing.

David Newman May 13th, 2007 09:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Derek Green (Post 678220)
Hi David, I understand the camera is only putting out 8bit and the Intensity is only capturing 8bit, but, if I understand you correctly, you're saying if you set NEO HD to capture 1080 4:2:2 8bit, it'll upconvert the 8bit signal to 10bit anyways? Do I understand you correctly on that?

Yes. We compress all YUV data as if it was in the 0 to 1023 range. 8-bit input are multiply by 4 before being compressed.

Quote:

As a side observation, without the HDV compression masking the picture and seeing the uncompressed monitor picture so clean, it's sure ALOT easier to see the 8bit limitations and color banding from the 8bit signal.
True, noise and compression ringing can hide camera limitation, but now you have to opportunity to control that yourself. If you use AE PRo in 16-bit mode, adding 0.4% noise to your composite, after your grade, will add 1 LSB of 8-bit noise -- great for suppressing banding. This only work with a 16 composite, which required NEO HD or better.

Fergus Anderson May 13th, 2007 10:35 AM

David

I have tried to download the neo player but the email with the link has not come through. I have tried it with 3 differenct email addresses now and also checked the junk mail. Could you check to see if its working?

Thanks
Fergus

Josef Nazdar May 13th, 2007 11:04 AM

same with my email :(

David Newman May 13th, 2007 11:27 AM

Sounds like the email server is down. Unfortunately we can't restart it remotely, so it will tomorrow when you get your emails. Sorry.

Ajit Bikram May 14th, 2007 07:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Derek Green (Post 678149)
Dude, I. Can't. Believe. It.

It WAS the HDMI cable! It wouldn't allow a 1080 signal, just a 480.

ENERGY HDMI CABLE = BAD
VELOCITY HDMI CABLE = GOOD

Terence, you are a rock star! If you hadn't of joined this thread saying how yours was working, I would never have given it another shot, especially since Black Magic confirmed their HV20 wasn't working with the Intensity either.

So everyone who's having problems, time to pony up for some new HDMI cables. I'm staring at a glorious 1920x1080 HDMI signal on my monitor right now. COOL!

Hi Derek,
I had a request for you since the intensity card is working with you.
I was wondering whether capturing a already taped footage over HDMI has some advantage compared to firewire or not.
Can you do a comparison and let us know?
Thanks!!

Ajit B.

Derek Green May 14th, 2007 08:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ajit Bikram (Post 679287)
Hi Derek,
I had a request for you since the intensity card is working with you.
I was wondering whether capturing a already taped footage over HDMI has some advantage compared to firewire or not.
Can you do a comparison and let us know?
Thanks!!

Ajit B.

I'm planning on it for sure. Unfortunately I don't own a resolution chart or color chart. I went to price them out today and I couldn't justify the $300 they wanted. If there's anyone out there in Vancouver that has a Sony or JVC cam with HDMI and wants to do a shoot out let me know.

Serge Victorovich May 16th, 2007 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Noah Yuan-Vogel (Post 676051)
I believe it has been said in other threads that most of these cameras only output 8bit over HDMI anyway so cineform not supporting more wont be a big thing, if anything, that's less data to deal with. Or is cineform expanding it the 8bit to 10bit anyway? I, too, am very interested in whether core2duo mobile processors in the 1.6-2.13ghz range are adequate for capturing from the intensity from an hv20. Perhaps in low quality mode? 2.33ghz core2duo mobile cpus are $600+ just for the cpu, and the 2.0 ghz version is like 1/3 the price. I guess overclocking might be an option for some. But if it is not necessary for capturing, it could make a big difference. I am interested in building a portable miniITX capture device using the intensity, so knowing exactly what cpu will give us the results we want for the lowest price will help a lot. Unfortunately I doubt many ITX boards can be easily overclocked. As much as i'd love to buy neo hd and an intensity card and test it on various mobile processors, I dont think I have the disposable income to afford it if the cpu's I buy dont end up being enough for reliable capture.

NEO HD seems a bit pricey even for all the things it does. David, any cineform fanboy discounts for posting on forums all day about how great cineform codecs are? :P Is it possible to use NEO HDV to capture from the intensity? will that just force resizing to 1440x1080? or are there also other limitations?

What mini-ITX motherboard can you recommend?
http://www.commell.com.tw/Product/SBC/LV-677.HTM
http://www.logicsupply.com/product_i...roducts_id/735
http://www.globalamericaninc.com/sbc...rboard_sbc.php
Thank you in advance.

Noah Yuan-Vogel May 16th, 2007 02:10 PM

That is a good question. I'd tend toward the aopen boards since they have a built in power supply... although I suppose they still need a regulator for the 19v battery input... I've just had a bad experience with an itx board that eventually burnt out after i ran it off an m1-atx psu for a few months. Then again it might have been the lack of active cooling. The MSI doesnt have dual channel memory, and people from cineform have often said memory bandwidth is a big plus for capturing to their codec. Other thoughts are whether to get a mobile cpu or a desktop cpu. It appears the commell lv-674 can take core2duo desktop cpus, which are a lot less expensive and allow for more options than mobile cpus. It's hard to know about these itx boards though, they are not nearly as widely used and documented as ATX boards so troubleshooting could be problematic. But definitely look for anything that has pci-e x1 and dual channel memory. And if you are going for a mobile cpu, make sure the socket is right.

Serge Victorovich May 16th, 2007 02:34 PM

Check this mini-ITX mainboard based on intel Q965 Express chipset:
http://www.epiacenter.com/modules.ph...ticle&sid=1064

Noah Yuan-Vogel May 16th, 2007 02:50 PM

Well that would be a great option if it had pci-e....

Serge Victorovich May 16th, 2007 03:23 PM

You are right...
But now we can see a lot mini-ITX "santa rosa" based mainboards.
Like this http://www.ipc2u.de/catalog/P/PE/35776.html

Noah Yuan-Vogel May 16th, 2007 03:29 PM

I dont think that is santa rosa :)

Santa rosa is a designation for boards that take mobile cpu's and meet particular specifications. That board is LGA 775; santa rosa would be socket P i believe. Chances of finding a socket P CPU for sale right now arent great i would imagine.

but you are right, hopefully we will start seeing santa rosa boards. Probably not for a few months though. ITX is usually the last form factor to get new technologies.

Serge Victorovich May 16th, 2007 03:34 PM

My another mistake...
And next candidate: http://www.aicmicro.com/productdetail.asp?id=32090

Terence Krueger May 16th, 2007 03:40 PM

i looked into more or less every mini itx board available. my conclusions was the a-open seemed to have the best setup for something like hdmi capture.

its got a pci express x1, sata 300, dvi, firewire. most every other board is missing something as they are geared to industrial use. the other benifit is that its a-open, and available everywhere and will be simple to get serviced.

on another note.. i got my black magic card, and may have found the answer to the "is the hv20 only 8 bit" question.

it doesnt matter.

the black magic hdmi input chip (analog devices AD9398) is only 8 bit. to some degree, who cares, its the only solution for now, but they do advertise it rather specifically as 10 bit, and its definitely not.

now ive got to work out my expresscard box.

terence

Noah Yuan-Vogel May 16th, 2007 03:59 PM

Yeah, I recall cineform tended to recommend the aopen boards a little while back when they were building their si-hd/2k body. Seems like itd be a good way to go. Probably a bit more documented than the industrial models in the same range. Anyone know a good way to run one of those off battery? I assume an 19v li-ion would be a problem as its voltage drops with use. maybe one of these would work?
http://www.batteryspace.com/index.as...OD&ProdID=2737

take it apart and fit it in a chassis?

Serge Victorovich May 26th, 2007 03:22 PM

AOpen's miniPC Duo MP965-VDR

Terence Krueger May 26th, 2007 06:14 PM

unfortunately that particular pc is of no use for the black magic card. it has no pci express, or expansion capability at all.

hopefully their mini itx version will follow soon, which should be very very useful.

terence

Giroud Francois May 27th, 2007 01:46 AM

while it is not really mini, i would recommend the shuttle SD39P2 .
It has everything you need. You need to find a VGA PCI card since the only PCIe will be busy with the intensity.
http://www.prodimex.ch/pInfos.asp?idxART=10929

Serge Victorovich May 27th, 2007 04:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Terence Krueger (Post 686915)
it has no pci express, or expansion capability at all.

Really bad if so...
Do you have link to specification of this mobo?

Terence Krueger May 27th, 2007 03:25 PM

http://global.aopen.com/products_spec.aspx

basically, the acer "mini pc" line uses a proprietary motherboard form factor. it only fits in the case it comes with and has no internal expansion.

a-open also make mini itx boards, which is a "standard" form factor, and can allow for usually one card slot of some kind. so far ther have not updated or announced any i965 mini itx boards, but with the mini pc out now, i cant imagine it will be long before they do. most likely the new board will have one x1 slot like the old version, but with updated things like sata2 and such. if they were smart, they would make it and x4 slot and include an expresscard slot as well (the chipset supperts this), but i doubt they will.

terence

Mark Keck May 30th, 2007 08:30 PM

Getting closer
 
Howdy folks.. first post.

I've been lurking here for quite some time now. Being a video runt, there is not much that I can offer yet. But thanks all for the education... I've learned more here than I can possible thank you for.

Anyway, I've got a little good news. I've been holding off getting an Intensity card and just couldn't resist anymore emailing Kristian Lam of Blackmagic for an update. With her permission, here is what she said:

"I don't want to give any dates right now but we're very close to releasing support. There's just some last minute kinks we need to iron out. Feel free to let the guys on forum know about this."

So for all you folks looking for an Intensity update fix, I hope this helps.

Oh, by the way, I'm looking at this for doing some stop motion capture using the HV20. So if anyone wants to through me a bone on that I'll do my best to catch it.

Mark

Roy Colquitt May 31st, 2007 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark Keck (Post 689379)
...just couldn't resist anymore emailing Kristian Lam of Blackmagic for an update. With her permission, here is what she said:


It great to have another update; even better that it's still positive. Thanks for posting it.

Apologies all around if I'm wrong, but I pretty sure Kristian is a he, not a she.

Mark Keck May 31st, 2007 05:17 PM

"Apologies all around if I'm wrong, but I pretty sure Kristian is a he, not a she."

Oh, you are so right. At least that's what Kristian just told me. Excuss me while I wipe the egg off my face. Kristian, my applogies!!.

Mark

Wes Vasher May 31st, 2007 09:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark Keck (Post 689379)
Oh, by the way, I'm looking at this for doing some stop motion capture using the HV20. So if anyone wants to through me a bone on that I'll do my best to catch it.

Mark, check out my thread below where I make my case for using the still-photo mode of the HV20 for doing stop-motion.

http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthread.php?t=91860

Mark Keck June 1st, 2007 04:42 AM

Thanks Wes, thought I had read all the stop motion threads but missed this one. Looks like I have more searching to do. But this is all off topic, so I'll go over my reasoning in a different thread when I've got my act together.

Ordered the intensity card with the anticipation of the new driver release, should be in next week. I see many more applications other than stop motion fo me... some of them pretty far-fetched... I'll just have to see where it takes me.

Mark

Wes Vasher June 1st, 2007 07:20 AM

Is there a way to capture single frames from the HDMI using Intensity? The nice thing about using the digital still is you get the entire sensor plus you are mobile and I believe the stills are 4:2:2 plus you can use the remote to take an "exposure" which keeps from moving the camera.

Mark Keck June 1st, 2007 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wes Vasher (Post 690207)
Is there a way to capture single frames from the HDMI using Intensity?

Yup. At the moment I can't go into all of it due to a few pesky discloser clauses. But once I have all the peices together and can talk about it, I'll let you know.

Mark

Wes Vasher June 1st, 2007 11:29 AM

Sounds good. I use BTV Pro for DV stop motion as that works really well at capturing single frames from a DV stream to any format. It also has onion skinning which is useful. Bypassing the JPEG compression of the digital still mode of the HV20 would be a good thing, since you are in a studio when shooting stop-motion usually anyway, being tied to an Intensity box isn't that big of an issue.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:26 PM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2025 The Digital Video Information Network