DV Info Net

DV Info Net (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/)
-   Canon VIXIA Series AVCHD and HDV Camcorders (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/canon-vixia-series-avchd-hdv-camcorders/)
-   -   Improved method for true 24p using JES Deinterlacer (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/canon-vixia-series-avchd-hdv-camcorders/94270-improved-method-true-24p-using-jes-deinterlacer.html)

Michael Krumlauf August 1st, 2007 10:56 AM

okay so i was messing around with the app a little more today and just to question something, i put a full res XL2 video i did awhile back which is a 24p file i went over and low and behold the telecine option was an option!

So what the hell, it lets me choose it on 24p clips but not 29.97 clips?

Just to make sure, i am using the HDV1080i60 easy setup to capture, i go and try to convert the file in the capture scratch folder correct? do i need to do anything extra to the file before putting it into JES?

Thanks

Michael Krumlauf August 3rd, 2007 07:49 AM

Anyone know what might be going on???????

Are there any other programs for us mac users that we could try out besides this because i cant seem to get that method to work with my footage

Austin Meyers August 3rd, 2007 12:23 PM

have you reinstalled JES, like i said earlier yours looks different than mine, i'm using 3.1.2. your input and project tabs are reversed from mine. can you take a screen shot of each tab in JES as you work through it, ie. the input tab just after you drop in the file you want to convert, then the project tab when you're changing the settings etc... also of note if you have the "progressive" box checked in the input tab it won't allow you to inverse telecine

Michael Krumlauf August 3rd, 2007 01:49 PM

I have the newest version of JES, i installed it on July 31st!

Here are pics off all of my tabs:
http://i123.photobucket.com/albums/o...icture1-19.png
http://i123.photobucket.com/albums/o...Picture3-1.png
http://i123.photobucket.com/albums/o...f/Picture4.png

Hope this helps you guys, thanks for taking time out and trying to help.

Mike

Austin Meyers August 3rd, 2007 05:17 PM

ok i think i've got a handle on this now, it appears that you're using the 2.7.4 version for os x 10.3 and under... if you're running 10.4 you need to dl the 3.2.1 version linked below:

http://www.xs4all.nl/%7Ejeschot/JES_...acer_3.2.1.zip

after running though the jaguar version it appears that it has issues with removing pulldown on hd resolution files regardless of their framerates

since it sounds like you're capturing HDV in FCP i'm assuming you're running tiger, so you should be able to dl the 3.2.1 version and everything should work as advertised...

personally i no longer use JES because i've upgraded to FCS 2 which has a pulldown remover in compressor

hope that helps

Tomas Chinchilla August 3rd, 2007 06:24 PM

Humm, thank you man it was very confusing as I have been using it for quite a while and couldn't figure out why he was having issues.

It would be nice to have ProRes422 HQ Support from the DIRECT dropdown menu. I am doing it via the Export menu and it's unreal how you can abuse this format in CC (POST)

Austin Meyers August 3rd, 2007 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tomas Chinchilla (Post 723214)
Humm, thank you man it was very confusing as I have been using it for quite a while and couldn't figure out why he was having issues.

It would be nice to have ProRes422 HQ Support from the DIRECT dropdown menu. I am doing it via the Export menu and it's unreal how you can abuse this format in CC (POST)

interesting, i've only used it just to say i have, and i haven't done much CC work as of late, most stuff i'm just leaving in HDV with render set to prores. are you using Color or just the CC in FCP?

Tomas Chinchilla August 3rd, 2007 07:58 PM

Combination of both, I need to learn to use Color as it looks like it has potential, I was surprised about Adobe Photoshop CS3 and how you can work with video there as well.

Robert Ducon August 4th, 2007 02:48 AM

I've used three alternatives for 24P (from the HV20's 60i stream):

a) JES

b) After Effects

and today

c) FCS2 Compressor

Results:

A - JES is good - works well, but leaves some artifacts from the deinterlace. works well though! Great for most projects - most people won't be able to tell.

B - Cleanest result yet. Probably a slight reduction in sharpness, but, wow - the image is as smooth as butter. Took forever to render, even on a Quad Mac Pro.

C - WORST results yet! Wow.. everything went macroblocky.. what the hell's up with that? It was very fast, and the cadence is correct, but the image is worse than the other two! Hardly what I expected.. (this is exporting to Prores 422 HQ!!) Am I doing something wrong? I dragged, dropped and set the settings as high as I could.

I'd expect Compressor would 'beat' JES, but not so.

Tomas Chinchilla August 4th, 2007 05:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robert Ducon (Post 723367)
I've used three alternatives for 24P (from the HV20's 60i stream):

a) JES

b) After Effects

and today

c) FCS2 Compressor

Results:

A - JES is good - works well, but leaves some artifacts from the deinterlace. works well though! Great for most projects - most people won't be able to tell.

B - Cleanest result yet. Probably a slight reduction in sharpness, but, wow - the image is as smooth as butter. Took forever to render, even on a Quad Mac Pro.

C - WORST results yet! Wow.. everything went macroblocky.. what the hell's up with that? It was very fast, and the cadence is correct, but the image is worse than the other two! Hardly what I expected.. (this is exporting to Prores 422 HQ!!) Am I doing something wrong? I dragged, dropped and set the settings as high as I could.

I'd expect Compressor would 'beat' JES, but not so.


I am confused again:

A) Deinterlace? 24p? (Shouldn't you be doing Inverse telecine on 24p material?)

Michael Krumlauf August 4th, 2007 09:06 AM

YES! It was the version of the software i got it to work, thank you so much! you all rock!

Mike :)

Michael Krumlauf August 5th, 2007 11:47 AM

ok i have one more question, could you capture the footage and edit it in a 60 timeline then send ur master export to jes and telecine what u edited or is it better to just telecine the captured stuff and edit like that?

Robert Ducon August 5th, 2007 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tomas Chinchilla (Post 723388)
I am confused again:

A) Deinterlace? 24p? (Shouldn't you be doing Inverse telecine on 24p material?)

I did do inverse telecine, but there are evidence of "interlace tears" still on the footage when viewed at 100%. I see it, and other have said this too.

I should note, these artifacts are there EVEN when capturing uncompressed footage and then running it through JES. But hey, it's free, beat Compressor so far, and gives me progressive. GO JES!

Austin Meyers August 6th, 2007 09:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Michael Krumlauf (Post 723814)
ok i have one more question, could you capture the footage and edit it in a 60 timeline then send ur master export to jes and telecine what u edited or is it better to just telecine the captured stuff and edit like that?

you can do it this way... but you will get some weird jaggies on scene changes. you can tweak some settings is JES to improve it, but in my experience i couldn't get rid of all the instances...


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:04 PM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2025 The Digital Video Information Network