DV Info Net

DV Info Net (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/)
-   Canon XH Series HDV Camcorders (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/canon-xh-series-hdv-camcorders/)
-   -   What's wrong with my A1 (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/canon-xh-series-hdv-camcorders/126119-whats-wrong-my-a1.html)

Kiflom Bahta July 16th, 2008 10:24 PM

What's wrong with my A1
 
I tried everything to figure this out but no luck. If you see the footage anything with horizontal line vibrate and flicker. It is worse when you see on tv. Here a sample http://www.vimeo.com/1353884. Thanks.

Khoi Pham July 16th, 2008 10:48 PM

Most likely from poor downconvert software, you don't see that if you watch it on a HDTV do you?

Kiflom Bahta July 16th, 2008 10:55 PM

This is SD footage and it was captured with premier pro 2. I don't know what to do, it only happens with my A1.

Bill Busby July 16th, 2008 11:03 PM

I always thought the A1's SD was mediocre at best. I always notice too much aliasing on movement with anything detailed.

Michael Wisniewski July 16th, 2008 11:07 PM

Might also be the following:

1. Might be artifacts from compression (does the XH A1 downconvert from HDV to get it's SD to tape?). That wall has lots and lots of small tiny details, which is a great way to break many compression schemes, especially HDV.

2. Might be the shutter speed matching the frequency of the fluorescent lights. Change the shutter speed and you might be able to lessen the effect.

3. It might be moiré. This is a typical problem with video cameras, usually with clothing that has very detailed patterns. If it is moire, then there's nothing wrong with your camera, it's just the way it works. You just have to work around those types of patterns. I do see some moiré in the shots of the baskets, and it "seems" to match the movement of the walls, just not as severe. But I'm just guessing.

- Moiré entry on Wikipedia
- An example of Moiré

Bill Busby July 16th, 2008 11:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kiflom Bahta (Post 908502)
This is SD footage

I was under the impression this was shot on SD.....

Kiflom Bahta July 16th, 2008 11:26 PM

It is was shot stright SD.!!!

Chris Soucy July 16th, 2008 11:30 PM

Hi Kiflom...........
 
Can't really say why it's doing what it's doing, but have seen any number of posts and video where SD shot as SD on an A1/ G1 looks pretty ropey.

The best suggestion I can make is to shoot in HDV and downconvert in PP2.

Can't guarantee it will cure it but a good chance it will.


CS

Michael Wisniewski July 16th, 2008 11:30 PM

Yeah, I'm wondering if the XH A1, creates it's SD from HDV and then writes that to tape. That may explain why there is a breakdown in movement in the SD image that's not normally there? Just speculating, since I don't really know. But those CCD chips should be giving a gee-whiz holy-cow SD image, but ...

Oh well, shoot it in HDV next time, then downconvert, you'll probably get a better image.

Chris Soucy July 16th, 2008 11:35 PM

Hey Michael...........
 
I think by CH's rules you owe me a beer, just stick it in the post will you!


CS

PS: Boy, that Michael doesn't hang about!

Brian David Melnyk July 17th, 2008 12:51 AM

what are Chris Hurd's rules?
i fear breaking them and owing virtual beer!
i bought some virtual beer from eBay, but by the time they arrived, they were warm. so i bought a virtual fridge. works great, and virtually CFC free.

Chris Soucy July 17th, 2008 01:08 AM

Too scared to ask......
 
for the full list, as I might find myself owing an aweful lot of beer to an aweful lot of people.

Hmm, "virtually" getting pi##ed, must have it's merits.

Can't say it rings my chimes, but there you go.

(Humble and sincere appologes to Kiflom for beernapping his thread).


CS

Kiflom Bahta July 17th, 2008 03:44 AM

Micheal, if you think it is moiré. How come i don't see on my dvx?

Kiflom Bahta July 17th, 2008 06:51 AM

Hey guys, i am willing to put some $$$, for any one who can solve this problem. Thx

Richard Hunter July 17th, 2008 06:52 AM

I would say that the vimeo clip flickering lines are mainly due to scaling and compression artifacts. I downloaded the original AVI file and it is much cleaner.

The original appears to be progressive footage. Is it possible that somewhere during the editing process your NLE has deinterlaced it when it shouldn't have? This will degrade the footage in a similar way too.

Richard

Kiflom Bahta July 17th, 2008 07:21 AM

If it is premier, then how come it doesn't do the same with my dvx. I shot the same thing with both camera @ 30p but it only happen to the A1 footage. thx

Przemysław Pyrek July 17th, 2008 07:25 AM

Hi guys,
i know that you all love A1, so do i - at least in HDV mode.
This is simply how it works in SD, it's the same thing with mine. Shooting SD with A1 you always end up with a flickery and blurry footage. My advice is, save yourself trouble and shoot HDV or if you need SD on tape, shoot it with some other camera.

Please guys, don't hurt me now... ;-)

Kiflom Bahta July 17th, 2008 07:41 AM

This is a tough pill to swollow. I am not sold on the SD Vs HD issue. It also does it with the original AVI. Richard, can you repost the corrected the version. Thx

Khoi Pham July 17th, 2008 09:14 AM

The reason is A1 is too sharp, those thin horizontal line flickering are result of interlaced, if something is sharp and thin, and horizontal when the tv display the odd lines, it is there, but if there is a little bit of movement and when the tv display the even lines and it is not there anymore that is when you see flickering, DVX is no where as sharp as A1 that is why you don't see that problem, if you buy and HDV camera, shoot it in HDV not SD, or try turning the sharpness all the way down and horizontal detail frequency all the way down in the main menu. Shoot in HD and watch it on a progressive HD and I guarantee you that the problem is not there so the problem is in SD, people with EX1 are having the same problem downconvert to SD if they don't do it right.

Kiflom Bahta July 17th, 2008 09:36 AM

Hi Khoi, I used Steven's vivid to shoot this event with sharp set at 3. Why would sharpness would be ok in HD not SD?

Khoi Pham July 17th, 2008 09:59 AM

Because HDTV are mostly progressive, does not have a problem with thin horizontal line dispalying 1 field and then next field where the line might not be there, I don't know Steven's vivid preset but sharpness should always set to 0 or neutral, in your case using the camera as SD camera, it might be better to go into the negative range, sharpness at above neutral does nothing but add edge enhancement, edge enhancement is adding contrast at the edge, this will make your flickering worse.
Go to this link and learn about edge enhancement.
http://www.videophile.info/Guide_EE/Page_01.htm

Kiflom Bahta July 17th, 2008 02:13 PM

I see no use in shooting HD if my client want SD. If they pay me for HD, I shoot HD. Anyways if this the case, I will be in Dallas on August 2nd for a shoot and i will be more than happy take to you to a stake house of your choice. (*____*)

Jim Andrada July 17th, 2008 11:48 PM

In which case, you should shoot with an SD camera unless the client wants HD.

I think the question was how to get the best SD result with your HD camera, and shooting HD and downconverting seems to be the prevalent answer

Brian David Melnyk July 18th, 2008 12:07 AM

i think, from what i've read here and also experienced, the 'use' in shooting and editing in HDV is that the final SD product is a better image, and you have more options in the future for output of the project (and the space required is the same as SD) . i relate it to recording audio at 24 bit 96 kHz when the final output is for a 16 bit 44.1 kHz CD (or MP3...). The end product is much richer. i''ve noticed a huge difference between 24 bit 96 kHz and 24 bit 44.1 kHz when converted to 16/44.1. Now i only record 24/96. so the question is: why use a match when you have a blowtorch?
CHAOS theory emphasizes the 'critical dependence on initial conditions'. it's SCIENCE...ience...ience...ience...ience....(ience).

Brian David Melnyk July 18th, 2008 12:15 AM

i think, from what i've read here and also experienced, the 'use' in shooting and editing in HDV is that the final SD product is a better image, and you have more options in the future for output of the project (and the space required is the same as SD) . i relate it to recording audio at 24 bit 96 kHz when the final output is for a 16 bit 44.1 kHz CD (or MP3...). The end product is much richer. i''ve noticed a huge difference between 24 bit 96 kHz and 24 bit 44.1 kHz when converted to 16/44.1. Now i only record 24/96. so the question is: why use a match when you have a blowtorch?
CHAOS theory emphasizes the 'critical dependence on initial conditions'. it's SCIENCE...ience...ience...ience...ience....(ience).

Dennis Murphy July 18th, 2008 07:00 PM

Vimeo does add some jitteryness even if you download the flic.
I shoot everything HDV, edit HDV and then render out to SD.

I suspect this will solve all your problems, but am willing to virtually drink anyone under the virtual table if I'm wrong.

Richard Hunter July 19th, 2008 10:05 PM

Here's the first half of the same clip, but rendered in 720P which is allocated a higher bitrate by Vimeo.

http://www.vimeo.com/1372097

The artifacts are much reduced, so I believe that the compression is the main cause of the jittery lines. Having said that, I must add that I fully agree with the others, that you should shoot in HDV resolution with the XH-A1 and downres it later. You can even downconvert in camera while capturing to hard disk. This is not the best way of working, but I think it will give you better quality than shooting SD. And you will not even have to deal with m2t files at all, you just edit SD DV files as normal.

Richard

Mark Fry July 21st, 2008 09:47 AM

Here's another vote for shooting and editing in HDV and only down-scaling right at the very end of the project. Shooting HDV and down-scaling in-camera will not be much better than shooting SD, with the XH-A1 and, I think, any other HDV camera. Choose your conversion software carefully, too, because they are not all the same. I use Avid Liquid, which is not bad, but I hear that Canopus ProCoder (stand-alone or as part of Edius) is the best of the bunch at the moment. Since you have an XH-A1, I think that's the best way to get good SD outputs from it.

As for whether it's worth using an HDV camera if the end product is a regular DVD - some of my viewers say they see an improvement over my old XM1, while others don't. It's certainly no worse. I needed to replace the XM1, so went for HDV, since it does SD just as well as the old one and gives me wonderful HD as well. However, a friend faced with a similar choice went for another SD cam (VX2100 in his case) even though he has an HDTV. Horses for courses...

Kiflom Bahta July 22nd, 2008 11:07 PM

Hi guys, i am still trying figure this out. I know it is not vimeo or premier cuz it still does the same thing before capture. I also know it is not the preset or sharpness. I am very sure it is not SD Vs HD thingy. The A1 takes amazing SD, way better than my other SD camera's. So i willing to give $$$ for any body who can figure it out. Thank.

Bill Busby July 22nd, 2008 11:59 PM

I just tried to look at this again & gave up with Vimeo. It's hard to judge anything qualitywise on that site.

I did use the download link provided for the avi file & noticed something interesting. It's as if there are stationary vertical "slices" (maybe 15 or so, evenly spaced) that seems to be maybe a field or frame out of sync with every other "slice". These "slices" are very apparent on the last scene while panning & it gets to a busier background. Check it out. I've never seen this oddity before. It's as if some crappy, somewhat subtle digital effect has been applied.

I would play this tape from the A1 if I were you & run this out to a monitor from your cam, preferably with component out. If it's not there then it's likely an error during your encoding process. If it IS there then I would contact Canon ASAP.

*edit* This was observed while using QT. I just now, on a whim, opened it with Media Player & can't see the sliced stuff but it still looks horrible nonetheless.

Bill Busby July 23rd, 2008 12:23 AM

I have too much time on my hands :)

Found something else interesting. I tried KM Player (free download, btw) & the quality is noticeably better... which makes this all the more difficult to troubleshoot :-\

Kiflom Bahta July 23rd, 2008 02:48 PM

I know it hard to trouble shoot but i am hoping someone here can solve it. One things i notice the vibrations get worse whenever i zoom in or zoom out.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:57 AM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network